Sentences with phrase «name being mentioned so»

If you find Lionel Messi's name being mentioned so often in this article, it's purely because of the talent and the greatness of the Little Argentinian.

Not exact matches

Monitor your old company name online, with aids like Google Alerts, so you are aware when it is mentioned.

The fact that so many founders around the globe (some are clearly British, another mentions his bedroom in Sydney, Australia) are willing to correspond with a reporter shows just how widespread these issues are, while demonstrating both the increased interest in discussing the issue openly and the remaining stigma (names were left off the article, after all).

I'd be interested to know your thoughts on the domain name - obviously «travelling» and «low carb» are both big traffic phrases but the broad match for travellinglowcarb is negligable - so does the domain name feature in your SEO plans or will you do it all via the long tail keywords you mentioned?

It's possible that your brand name will overlap with a lot of other similar named themes, so be very specific about what you want to find mentions about.

I had in my heart and tongue the Name of Allah when ever I had fears, troubles or depression of any kind but from Jan 05 1995 when had lost my father and second brother in a car accident, it was the time I really felt am alone at age of 33 to face all the challenges my father has left upon me to run and manage among other partners therefore had been investigating the Quran as to understanding every word of it rather than to memorize it, have been did a lot of reciting verses of prayers begging God to look upon me and give me strength... am sure through such difficult times if I had no faith in God I would have perished and lost every thing long ago... Another thing my heart always gave me signs and my mind gave me logic of what to believe although have read many books abroad in my youth of many beliefs out of curiosity but could not belief in other than that God is one and Muhammed is his last prophet in all belief of the Quran he brought upon me / us in all that it says... Should mention at times had experienced dreams seeing signs and warnings long in advance of things going to happen A year or more before losing my father in a car accident I had seen him in my dream good bye wearing white cloth and going to board a tourist ship all crew dressed in white uniform rolling a red carpet on front of him and when was on the top of the stairs weaver smiling good bye... seen in another dream how or wealth will be stolen and what I will hold... so many things like that..

It is exactly how satan works — he mixes one drop of poison with alot of truth so it sonds «beautiful» to those who seek to have their ears tickled, then they drink the poison, every single drop and crave more as long as they don't have to hear the name of Jesus mentioned.

Maybe when you were naming your kids, there was a name you thought was good, but when you mentioned it to your spouse, they were reminded of a kid they had trouble with back in grade school, and so could never name their child that.

Then, to add insult to injury, Nycloe Termel, read from Philippians, leaving out any mention of Jesus Christ, which was the main point of Philippians 2: Therefore God exalted him [JesusChrist] to the highest place and gave him the name that is aboveevery name, that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth, and every tongueacknowledge that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God theFather.It was a shameless display of offense to Christians and Christianity so as not to, apparently, offend anyone else.

Funny that the Denver shooter was in court and NO ONE EVER MENTIONED IF HIS CHRISTIAN OR ANY OTHER FAITH... I swear if his name was Mohammad than the whole country would be in flames... BUT he was mentally ill so it was justified and the case was closed quietly so everyone can go back to what they do since it has no value to the media... OPEN YOUR EYE and ears...

Paul isnot going to sit and name each and everyone of them... the people can go and verify for themselves... Paul mentions they exist becaue he can believe that people willnot be so gullible and go find out for themselves if they really wanted to

So devoted were the American founders to this understanding of religious liberty that, as Thomas Jefferson wrote in his Autobiography (1821), the authors of the Virginia Bill for Establishing Religious Freedom refrained from mentioning the exact name of the «holy author of our religion.»

Plus, as I've already mentioned, a monk named Calcidius espoused this view in the 5th century and was not branded a heretic for doing so.

However, the other half do not mention denominational ties, and even those that do so rarely name the special organization without referring to a wider Church of which the denomination is a part.

So is Christianity really following Jesus or the writers of these gospels... oh and the Hebrew chapters has not clue who and when was it written... my suggestion is to spend sometime to know what you believe and what you want to believe... also if you really like to know about what real Jesus was, please read Quran... more eighty times the name of Jesus is mentioned in this book... where there is a chapter with Jesus» mother name «Mary» chapter 19, there is another chapter name «ale imran'the grand father of Jesus, chapter 3... and then compare what Jesus really was dear brother in mankind...

Amongst philosophers and logicians, particularly amongst those who have given special attention to scientific problems, many names could be mentioned, including that great thinker, L. T. Hobhouse, whom I like to mention first because I owe so much to his writings.

My humble suggestions to you is to go to The Quran and what it talks about Jesus... as his (Jesus) name is mentioned there 80 + times... there are chapters with his mothers name, with his grand fathers (father of Marry) name and so on... i am not asking you to be a Muslim but see what it says and think what make sense... you may be amazed who knows and will discover something new...

The problem with athiest is that 1) In the terminology Christmas, the name of Christ is mentioned so they don't like that.

It would be invidious to mention the names of popular books which commend prayer and set forth techniques of praying, but are so alien to the whole Christian position — although written sometimes by ministers of Christian bodies — that it is astounding that they are accepted so readily by people who profess and call themselves Christians.

Kennedy's judgment was a far cry from the words of the great legal scholar William Blackstone, who referred to sodomy in his magisterial Commentaries (1769) as «an offence so dark in nature, the very mention of which is a disgrace to human nature, a crime not fit to be named.»

There is no mentioning of the name christ, nor jc, nor mary, anywhere, in the so called OT, the book of remembrance the true name of this book in Malachi 3:16.

He was probably not the god originally mentioned in the telling of the story, but by this time he had become chief god of the city of Babylon and therefore greatest of the gods, so his name was substituted as champion.

I remember before JWBush got into presidency, the ole slick weasel, Carl Rowe advised him to play «Jesus» card and blow his «religious» horn, telling him this is the sure way to win, since American Evangelical Christians are so gullible and they'll back up anyone who mentions the Name of Jesus and says that he / she is a Christian... «You shall know them by their fruit.

JohnQuest, I am just curious as to what he can talk about...... if there are so many opinions that he must «respect»............ if he speaks up about Truth in, say, abortion, won't he be siding with someone or against someone who holds the same opinion even without mentioning their political names?

We do not recognize Islam, Mohamad, or what's his name??? Have lived through the days or Hitler, Stalin, so these idiots are not even worth mentioning.

So mention the name of Allah over them when they are drawn up in lines.

What the Old Testament especially teaches us is this: «that zeal is as essentially a duty of all God's rational creatures, as [are] prayer and praise, faith and submission; and, surely, if so, [then] especially of sinners whom He has redeemed: that zeal consists in a strict attention to His commands» a scrupulousness, vigilance, heartiness, and punctuality, which bears with no reasoning or questioning about them» an intense thirst for the advancement of His glory» a shrinking from the pollution of sin and sinners» an indignation, nay impatience, at witnessing His honor insulted» a quickness of feeling when His name is mentioned, and a jealousy how it is mentioned» a fullness of purpose, an heroic determination to yield Him service at whatever sacrifice of personal feeling» and an energetic resolve to push through all difficulties, were they as mountains, when His eye or hand but gives the sign» a carelessness of obloquy, or reproach, or persecution, a forgetfulness of friend and relative, nay, a hatred (so to say) of all that is naturally dear to us, when He says, «Follow me.»

So you think that mentioning someone by name who is your friend and also counselor and a life coach is betraying a confidence.

So his name shouldnt be brought up on this site as he is not worthy of being mentioned never mind an Article.

The OX is still an Arsenal player (quickly checks to confirm) and as far as I'm aware he's not injured, so I wonder why his name wasn't even mentioned in the article?

The fact we are going so hard for Lemar presumably means Wenger is preparing for 1 or 2 departures from the names mentioned above??

Explain why it does not make sense to even mention some so call targets name, when they are an integral part of a team participating in the CL and euro cup, especial when they will be moving on to the knockout round, especially when the CL and Euro are the PiNNACLE of some players playing carrier.

Even wenger himself admitted that Sanchez is in RED ZONE and he kept playing him, so now what??? I don't want mention names for todays failure, but if I have to then: Giroud Flamini Cazorla Gabriel Ramsey and then WENGER.

In the midfield, (including RWB & LWB) we have a whole bunch of tweeners... none offer the full package, none make sense in our manager's current favourite formation, except for Sead on the left and Ox on the right, and all of them have never shown any consistency for more than a heartbeat... Sead, who I'm including in this category because of our present formation, looks like a positive addition, minus his occasional brain farts, but I would rather see what he could do in a back 4 before making my mind up... Ox, who has never played better, which isn't saying much considering his largely underwhelming play in previous seasons, seems to have found a home in this new formation; unfortunately, can we really expect this oft - injured player to handle the taxing duties that come with said position over the long haul, not to mention, it looks like he has no intention of staying... Ramsey has relied on the empathy that stems from his gruesome injury years ago and the excitement that was generated a few years back when he finally seemed to put in altogether, but on the whole he has been a big disappointment (neither he nor the Ox have scored enough to warrant a regular spot)... Wiltshire should be put on a weekly contract then played until he suffers his first injury, if and when that occurs he should be shipped - out and no one should very be allowed to say his name on club grounds ever again... Elnehy & Coq are average players who couldn't make any of the top 7 teams currently in the EPL... both have showed some great energy on the pitch, but neither are top quality and no good team can afford to have that many average players on their bench playing the same position, especially with Coq's injury history / discipline concerns and Elheny's headless chicken tendencies... as for Xhaka, his tenure here so far has been incredibly underwhelming... we know he has some skills to provide the long ball but his defensive work is piss poor and he gives the ball away too cheaply and far too often... finally, the enigma himself, Ozil, so much skill with his left foot but his presence has been more frustrating than uplifting... in many respects his failure has been directly related to the failure of this club to provide him with the necessary players up front, minus Sanchez of course, and unless something drastic happens very soon his legacy will be largely a negative one (much like Wenger's)

Watters» self - promotion grew so annoying to 49er veterans last year that whenever his name was mentioned in meetings, they would sarcastically add, «Should've won the Heisman.»

these names you mentioned are not world class in my book and not sure if there much better if any than mikel or flam so just not sure it would be worthwhile signing.

I get what you are saying but I just do nt see any coach who has actually watched Giroud note I said who's actually watched Giroud to pay above 20mill for him.Trust me when the time comes for him to go we ai nt gonna get a lot of cash.i also expect him to be going to a lesser team and not a top team.Trust me he's really lucky to be an Arsenal player as some of our playrrs here are.I don't want to mention names because my blood boils up when I even think of them in the team.There are so many players in this team I don't rate but hey I guess I got ta keep em to myself.Sadly Giroud is one of them.It's not like I hate or I refuse to see the light but it's just that my eyes are telling me he's average when I watch him.So if anything please blame my eyes.

Because so many names have since been mentioned and are being mentioned for Arsenal to buy.

Wenger has already said that he will be looking at bringing in 2 - 3 signings, so unless you got names that haven't already been mentioned, theres no need to boast about inside information!?

We said the same thing about many youngsters in the past and many of them have ended up as disappointments, I won't mention names, but I think it is futile to rely so much on the prospect of potential in our youth players.

So this business of wanting every name you hear being mentioned might turn out not to be what you hoped for.

third — you said that wenger should buy five star and good players (you mentioned names too), but we knew that there is no way wenger will do it, not five, he is not ready to sign two quality players so, enough is enough, this rubbish old man should go as soon as possible

This isn't a fight about the two; Ozil never mentioned Wright by name and Wright hasn't even criticized him, to the best of my knowledge, so let's not make it what it isn't.

There are two guys here whose name i will not mention they think they are so wise and always make up excuses.I feel sorry for them because they live their lives in lies honestly speaking.Its a pity that peeps have to be like this.This is part of the mental barrier that has been holding this club.Not being honest and and acting in accordance with truth.I feel sorry for them.Well you can alway shave the pleasure of saying I told you so.

There could be similarities between Pogba signing and MBappe signing, MBappe has been mentioned in every paper it feels like and MBappe is a name on so many AFC fans lips... So many of us believing it will never happen.so many AFC fans lips... So many of us believing it will never happen.So many of us believing it will never happen...

I have been reading comments of fans on here, especially those who have chosen to appreciate the average in ability that a striker like giroud possess, my question for ya all is, when did arsenal become a team so low on profile to sing praise of a striker who no one can rank among the top 3 striker in the league, I have seen an arsenal team with a striking force with players like, anelka, Wright, Henry, v persie, no one can rank giroud or whatever his name is in the category of my mentioned strikers.we all have got to face it, giroud is not good enough to be leading the attack of a team dreaming of winning the league, and Henry is right saying arsenal can't win the league with giroud as our striker,,, check this out, man u won league titles with strikers like Rooney, van nisteroy, v persie, man city won with aguero, Chelsea with drogba and now Costa, giroud stand no chance against any of those.let's stop appreciating mediocrity, wenger should get us a good striker as giroud is damn too average for arsenal

So, if he WAS interested in this player, firstly, why was he NOT signed and secondly, and by far the most important of all, where in Griezmanns OWN autobiography does he mention Wenger's name as the person who lied to hiWAS interested in this player, firstly, why was he NOT signed and secondly, and by far the most important of all, where in Griezmanns OWN autobiography does he mention Wenger's name as the person who lied to hiwas he NOT signed and secondly, and by far the most important of all, where in Griezmanns OWN autobiography does he mention Wenger's name as the person who lied to him?.

Routledge is a England Under 21 international but at Spurs he has discovered himself increasingly on the sidelines with not anyone not so much as mentioning his name.

Maybe I'm not exaggerating when I say that you can't so much as mention the guy's name without triggering a s * itstorm and that it's not always my fault this kind of stuff goes off the railss name without triggering a s * itstorm and that it's not always my fault this kind of stuff goes off the railss not always my fault this kind of stuff goes off the rails.

like I've said before, Wenger is simply stating that Sanchez is staying so that he can regain some leverage when it comes time to make a deal and to shift the focus back squarely on Sanchez... this is 101 tactics in PR management... the very fact that he even mentioned RVP's name speaks to the utterance arrogance of a man that believes he answers to no one... before you harshly judge Sanchez think carefully about what the ultimate intentions of both parties involved... Sanchez wants to win trophies and get paid generously for his efforts, whereas the club wants to pull the wool over our eyes once again so that we blame the player for wanting the very things we told him we wanted when we brought him in... how many times do we have to go down this road before we realize the only common factor in each of these scenarios is the club itself... trust me, if we showed any ambition Sanchez's contract demands would be much different... just like in other major sports players will take a «home town» discount if they see those in charge making a truly honest attempt to fight for the highest honours in their respective fields... that being said, if they see a team trying to make disparaging remarks about them in the press and not following through on their promises, they will likely try to make them pay a premium for their services or seek greener pastures... btw if anyone simply looks at the score versus Bayern today and thinks that even for a second that this was a deserved victory, just watch the game and judge for yourself... actually save yourself the anguish and just know that if it weren't for Cech and Martinez this could have been a repeat of our Champions League flopping or worse