Sentences with phrase «name change debate»

Not exact matches

For example, there's been a long - standing debate both externally and internally on the name of the company and whether it should change with our transformation.

After nearly two years of debate, the R.E. Lee Episcopal Church in Lexington, Virginia, will officially change its name.

In the current state of debate about these matters, I perhaps ought to expect myself to feel «excluded» as a man from reading Jane Austen's Emma until all female references to the protagonist are edited out, the title changed to M., and the author's name reduced to the discreet neutrality of J. Austen.

An American church named after a Confederate general has decided to change its name after debating the issue for two years.

An American church named after a Confederate general has decided to change its name after debating the... More

Until recently the reason given for the change was that there was a debate about the name among the players and they voted to change it.

Board members this week debated changing the park naming policy, which restricts parks being named after individuals.

If the government insists on handing out honours (whether or not it should is a separate debate), surely it would be better to give the awards names that suit contemporary Britain and its changed values?

While the debate continues between the Oneida Indian Nation and the Washington Redskins regarding the team's name and mascot, in upstate New York, several institutions faced similar decisions more than a decade ago and did change their names.

Peter Mandelson is planning to introduce changes to the Digital Economy Bill now in Parliament to give the Secretary of State power to amend copyright law by statutory instrument, effectively allowing he and his successors to do anything, without parliamentary approval or debate, provided it is done in the name of protecting copyright.

Yesterday, NSF officials settled the debate — for the moment — by announcing that the name won't change.

After a philosophical debate on perception of change, and two hearing dates, the presiding judge who granted the request said: «So you have changed your name to exactly what it was before in the spirit of refreshing yourself as though you were a web page.»

It would be nonsensical to group all this together and try to name what is happening but one thing for sure is that the background conditions of art, the support structures, the connection to audiences and intellectual debates are going through revolutional change.

This name change — a controversial idea currently under vigorous and passionate international debate — would represent a formal recognition and acknowledgement of what Burtynsky, Baichwal and de Pencier call the «human signature» on the planet.

I agree that cultural cognition — the idea that we shape our views so they agree with those in the groups with which we most closely identify, in the name of acceptance by our group and thus of safety — powerfully explains the polarized passions over whether climate change is «real,» the «debate» that gets most of the attention about public opinion.

It got a name, the Hockey Stick, then it sort of took on a life of its own, and we found ourselves in the middle of the climate change debate.

The role of SEPP is to act as chairman of NIPCC, the otherwise informal network of scientists under whose name the Climate Change Reconsidered series appears; coordinate efforts by the Center to identify and recruit scientists as lead authors, contributors, and reviewers; convene NIPCC meetings during the research and review stages to share research and debate areas of disagreement; and participate with Heartland in the release of the report as a spokesperson for the effort.

The names included on the list, as well as Bast's own meeting notes, suggest the Heartland Institute wants the debate to go directly after the scientific and legal underpinnings of the EPA's regulations on climate change.

How to attack the actual deceit and real science denial of the knowing fraud of climate change based renewable energy extortion, in such a way that the law has to consider the facts of the actual fraud, not the unprovable asssertions on the role of CO2 in climate change or the reputaions of the academic PR men for the rackets that justify them, and detach the debate from the climate to focus on the facts of what is done in its name that can only make energy supply expensively worse in fact, FOR PROFIT.

I think a lot of people, including politicians, are starting to notice this point, because if you look at the late 90's the debate was all about the crisis of global warming, but now they've suddenly changed the name to «climate change» instead.

With regard to the wider public «debate» about AGW, though, I don't see how it is a «bad idea» to name names of politicians who deliberately and aggressively LIE to the American people about the reality of anthropogenic global warming and climate change, and who engage in vicious and dishonest attacks on climate scientists.

So many in the climate change debate have apparently forgotten the physics of the consequences of what they support in its name.

The final say on the name change will ultimately be up to Convocation, which will debate the issue and vote on the motion Thursday.

Proposed «CodeNEXT» changes, the name the city has given its re-writing of the zoning for the City, are in a hot debate with the second draft currently in review.