Sentences with phrase «name of your course does»

This part must focus upon the names of courses done and the names of the educational institutions from which education is attained.

Not exact matches

You know Occam's Razor, of course, even if you don't know it by that name.

Of course, the fact that the company didn't name them «men's» and «women's» doesn't mean Apple didn't intend to target two different sets of customerOf course, the fact that the company didn't name them «men's» and «women's» doesn't mean Apple didn't intend to target two different sets of customerof customers.

Of course, the name has nothing to do with religion and everything to do with that out - of - this - world feeling you get when you have a scoop of their ice creaOf course, the name has nothing to do with religion and everything to do with that out - of - this - world feeling you get when you have a scoop of their ice creaof - this - world feeling you get when you have a scoop of their ice creaof their ice cream.

Of course, email address is a requirement, but do you really need first and last names?

During the course of its investigation, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau reviewed the mortgage referral activities of the Corvallis, Oregon - based real estate broker Willamette Legacy, LLC, which does business under the name Keller Williams Mid-Willamette.

see what religion does... all in the name of some imaginary sky - daddy, who is nothing but just one of the thousands of «gods» invented by man over the course of human history.

You do know, of course, that a good chunk of the people can't even name our current VP?

This all seems rather silly but I could see the Student Republicans flooding the Student Democrats (or vice-versa of course) with fake members then electing people who would do outrageous things in the name of the group to disgrace them.

Not to point out the obvious, (which, of course, I'm clearly going to do), but for someone who named himself after a Swedish carved wooden horse, calling anyone else out on their name is... silly.

What kind of name did they make with God during the course of their life?

Of course they could — and the name they choose is just one of a thousand such decisions that could do sOf course they could — and the name they choose is just one of a thousand such decisions that could do sof a thousand such decisions that could do so.

As to Peter's name maning «rock», of course it does.

Of course, didn't David Letterman name his new son Harry?

Of course Satin had nothing to do with the murders and brutality of the Crusades, nor the burning deaths of «witches» in Salem, torture and burning «heretics» at the stake in the Middle Ages, and most certainly not the millions of Jews killed by a good Catholic by the name of HitleOf course Satin had nothing to do with the murders and brutality of the Crusades, nor the burning deaths of «witches» in Salem, torture and burning «heretics» at the stake in the Middle Ages, and most certainly not the millions of Jews killed by a good Catholic by the name of Hitleof the Crusades, nor the burning deaths of «witches» in Salem, torture and burning «heretics» at the stake in the Middle Ages, and most certainly not the millions of Jews killed by a good Catholic by the name of Hitleof «witches» in Salem, torture and burning «heretics» at the stake in the Middle Ages, and most certainly not the millions of Jews killed by a good Catholic by the name of Hitleof Jews killed by a good Catholic by the name of Hitleof Hitler.

However, as James Sanders wrote in Torah and Canon: «The true prophet does not engage in political diatribe to provide a rallying point for a particular course of action... he questions all the powers that be in the name of the one power beyond them.»

Saying god exists does not make that so... of course the opposite is true as well... all the pundits here (and Hawking) who like to call things by descriptive names like «fairy tales» do so because they are desperate to be right in this matter... because no one can be proven right or wrong in this I choose to respect the faith that some have in Science as well as thos who have faith in God's existence.

The reason they are mnot saved is because of lawlessness rather than being obedience to Gods word they believed in Jesus Christ but because of there hearts did not walk according to the word and because it speaks of signs and wonders it seems more about them and the works that they did.Of course none of us are saved by works.How do you understand that passage as some are saved and some are not it seems clear that to be saved we must believe and also walk in obedience to Gods word.brentnz A Tree and its Fruit mat 7: 2Many will say to Me on that day, «Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in Your name, and in Your name drive out demons and perform many miracles?»

We do it, by cunning, by power and prestige, by elaborately contrived false witness - we too do it claiming the while that it is done in the name of Yahweh, according to God's holy ordinance, even in the name of Jesus Christ, and of course because we are a Christian nation.

Some of those above you don't really function as blogs, but as conduits for getting «their» message across... no names of course!

All of this, of course, was done in the name of «ethics, truth, honesty, integrity, and being salt and light.»

Casting off the confines of the silliness of belief is what will finally free up humankind to some measure of greatness, provided of course believers don't succeed in squashing education in favor of myth, or blowing up the planet in the name of some angry invisible hominid who apparently lives in the sky.

I do not know its name, and I give it the designation of the Tao (the Way or Course).

Of course he will prevent any infection or complications from a tattoo done in his name.

I've known Jesus for as long as I've known my name, and still I use other people like capital to advance my own interest, still I gossip to make myself feel important, still I curse my brothers and sisters in one breath and sing praise songs in the next, still I sit in church with arms folded and cynicism coursing through my bloodstream, still I talk a big game about caring for the poor without doing much to change my own habits, still I indulge in food I'm not hungry for and jewelry I don't need, still I obsess over what people say about me on the internet, still I forget my own privilege, still I talk more than I listen and complain more than I thank, still I commit acts of evil, still I make a great commenter on Christianity and a lousy practitioner of it.

We can, of course name it but when we do so the mythcollapses into allegory.

Of course Torah... there are plenty of verses in Koran talks about Torah and Injeel... both Torah and Injeel were having the name of the prophet and the koran to come if you see in 3:70 and they knew it both the Jews and Christians... but after the revelation of Koran some of them believed and most of them did not and we have people till today that they do not believe even though their history tells the truth.Of course Torah... there are plenty of verses in Koran talks about Torah and Injeel... both Torah and Injeel were having the name of the prophet and the koran to come if you see in 3:70 and they knew it both the Jews and Christians... but after the revelation of Koran some of them believed and most of them did not and we have people till today that they do not believe even though their history tells the truth.of verses in Koran talks about Torah and Injeel... both Torah and Injeel were having the name of the prophet and the koran to come if you see in 3:70 and they knew it both the Jews and Christians... but after the revelation of Koran some of them believed and most of them did not and we have people till today that they do not believe even though their history tells the truth.of the prophet and the koran to come if you see in 3:70 and they knew it both the Jews and Christians... but after the revelation of Koran some of them believed and most of them did not and we have people till today that they do not believe even though their history tells the truth.of Koran some of them believed and most of them did not and we have people till today that they do not believe even though their history tells the truth.of them believed and most of them did not and we have people till today that they do not believe even though their history tells the truth.of them did not and we have people till today that they do not believe even though their history tells the truth...

[specific names not needed, of course — just setting] And is this phrase «do not touch God's anointed» a Biblical one?

Over the course of recorded history more wars and killings have been done in the name religion than for any other reason.

And of course they could be the result of the union of material from two people who were not married and who did not even know each other's names.

If then this issue has been settled by these Doctors of Law or experts in this way, and we certainly are in those situations in which one may resist the governing authority... we are unable to oppose... if in this instance it is necessary to fight back, even if the Emperor himself attacks, or whoever else may do so in his name... That until now we have taught absolutely not to resist the governing authority was due to the fact that we did not know that the governing authority's law itself grants the right to do so; we have of course always diligently taught that this law must be obeyed.

Adopting «in Jesus» name» as the necessary minimal condition for a counting as a «Christian congregation» for the purpose of a theological school's study does not, of course, require any particular answer to the quite different question whether God is truly known and worshiped by groups who do not worship in Jesus» name or whether God is redemptively present to them.

She is renewing the conviction that to be a Christian requires one to be a socialist as well, Of course this does not mean an unqualified approval of all that is done in the name of socialisOf course this does not mean an unqualified approval of all that is done in the name of socialisof all that is done in the name of socialisof socialism.

There is often (in such churches) an official group which serves the thought - police function, though of course, they do not go by that name.

And in so doing, you're potentially going to be changing (for better or worse) some things: dough consistency and strength, fermentation time, keeping quality, and, of course, flavor and texture of the bread, to name a few.

I will not be surprised if us Arsenal fans are naming Theo as our player of the season, not betting on it either but I will not be surprised if he does step up that much over the course of the season.

In the midfield, (including RWB & LWB) we have a whole bunch of tweeners... none offer the full package, none make sense in our manager's current favourite formation, except for Sead on the left and Ox on the right, and all of them have never shown any consistency for more than a heartbeat... Sead, who I'm including in this category because of our present formation, looks like a positive addition, minus his occasional brain farts, but I would rather see what he could do in a back 4 before making my mind up... Ox, who has never played better, which isn't saying much considering his largely underwhelming play in previous seasons, seems to have found a home in this new formation; unfortunately, can we really expect this oft - injured player to handle the taxing duties that come with said position over the long haul, not to mention, it looks like he has no intention of staying... Ramsey has relied on the empathy that stems from his gruesome injury years ago and the excitement that was generated a few years back when he finally seemed to put in altogether, but on the whole he has been a big disappointment (neither he nor the Ox have scored enough to warrant a regular spot)... Wiltshire should be put on a weekly contract then played until he suffers his first injury, if and when that occurs he should be shipped - out and no one should very be allowed to say his name on club grounds ever again... Elnehy & Coq are average players who couldn't make any of the top 7 teams currently in the EPL... both have showed some great energy on the pitch, but neither are top quality and no good team can afford to have that many average players on their bench playing the same position, especially with Coq's injury history / discipline concerns and Elheny's headless chicken tendencies... as for Xhaka, his tenure here so far has been incredibly underwhelming... we know he has some skills to provide the long ball but his defensive work is piss poor and he gives the ball away too cheaply and far too often... finally, the enigma himself, Ozil, so much skill with his left foot but his presence has been more frustrating than uplifting... in many respects his failure has been directly related to the failure of this club to provide him with the necessary players up front, minus Sanchez of course, and unless something drastic happens very soon his legacy will be largely a negative one (much like Wenger's)

Mertz should never have been our captain in the first place... who has ever heard of a team that makes 11th hour transfer buys (Arteta & Mertz) then seemingly places those same individuals into prominent leadership positions from the get - go... indicative of the problems that have permeated our clubhouse for the better part of 7 years under the Kroenke & Wenger... what is wrong with the players chosen and / or the management style of Wenger that doesn't develop and / or encourage strong leadership from within... Mertz was the fine collecting lackey from year one... this is what happens when you don't get world - class players because many times they want to have a voice on and off the pitch and this can't happen when you play for a fragile manager who has developed a coddling wage structure where everyone is rewarded for simply wearing the shirt and participating in the process... not enough balance between performance and pay, combined with the obvious favoritism shown to some players regardless of their glaring lack of production... remember that Ramsey has played in positions that make no sense considering his skill - set (out wide) and has forced other players off the field or into equally unfamiliar positions with little or no justification (let's remember when you read articles about how Ramsey's goals this upcoming season being the potential X-factor for our success that this is the same individual who didn't score a goal until the final week last season)... this of course is just one example of many... before I hear another word from Mertz I want this club to address the fact that no former player of any real consequence has any important role in the management structure of this club, yet several former Gunners have expressed serious interest in just such an endeavor (Henry, Viera, Adams, Bergkamp... just to name a few legends)... there is only one answer: an extremely insecure manager!!!

Don't do it too often though otherwise there is little point being on here (other than name calling or judging others of coursedo it too often though otherwise there is little point being on here (other than name calling or judging others of course).

Of course, they appear to do it in slightly nicer PJs that have their names monogrammed on them.

Although he has his inconsistencies and occasionally gets his name in the papers for all the wrong reasons, there is no doubt that he does have talent that is still waiting to be nurtured, not to mention he is of course a true Gooner!

They've often settled for moments of shock value over substance, and while they've spent the last few years trying to correct that course — eliminating the Divas Belt and replacing it with Women's Championships, getting rid of the concept of «Divas» altogether by naming their women performers «Superstars» like the men, and introducing more screen time and more talented performers from around the globe — there remains work to be done.

As for chatter about who else could be in danger of an arrest, you can pretty much find any name you'd like, (doesn't mean you should believe any of it yet, of course).

I was thinking Reus, which would of course be a terrific move, but hearing Wenger talk about Sterling and how we didn't move for him because we have «plenty» who can play out wide (he named Theo, ox, alexis, even Jack...).

(Thanks, Frank McL, Big Raddy, Jon Sammels, Geordie Armstrong, Bob Wilson etc) I have often asked myself that question and the only answer I can really believe is, it was the great classy way the club always behaved; the treatment of its ex - players, its fans, its name for innovation, its great name and yes, of course its honourable - though sometimes not especially talented players, who did however, ALWAYS give their utmost every game, to win — those things, plus the great kit and red / white colour and Highbury and its atmosphere.

Paul Pogba does start despite concerns that he would be another absentee, while the majority of the big players left out have been named on the substitutes» bench should they be needed over the course of the 90 minutes.

There are of course other far more likely departures from the LS but they do not have the same dramatic effect as those named and published in The Mirror.

The likely absences of big names such as Edwin Van Der Saar, Nemanja Vidic, Rio Ferdinand, Wayne Rooney and, of course, boy wonder himself Javier Hernandez does open up the window of opportunity for the Seasiders, but I doubt they'll manager to squeeze through it.

Of course, Spurs boss Harry Redknapp does have sufficient depth in his squad to name a starting XI more than capable of beating relegation threatened Blackpool at White Hart Lane, despite all the documented injurieOf course, Spurs boss Harry Redknapp does have sufficient depth in his squad to name a starting XI more than capable of beating relegation threatened Blackpool at White Hart Lane, despite all the documented injurieof beating relegation threatened Blackpool at White Hart Lane, despite all the documented injuries.

This name may be a bit misleading because women really only produce one type of milk, although the fat content of the milk does change over the course of a feeding.