Sentences with phrase «names mean when»

Not exact matches

When René - Robert Cavelier, Sieur de La Salle claimed the territory for France in 1682, he named it La Louisiane, meaning «Land of Louis.»

This means taking steps so that when people are searching for your name (in advance of a sales meeting, say, or a job interview) or looking for someone like you with your experience and expertise, your name shows up in search results.

«For many of us, it becomes increasingly easy to rationalize our actions in the name of expediency when facing difficult decisions — to choose a path where the ends justify the means.

By «seed» I mean, add in a few names from different locations that you know will report back to you and tell you when your mail was delivered and what condition it was in when it arrived.

When Harper first ran for prime minister in 2004, his name was so meaningless to Canadians that he sought to pour meaning into it with those issue - based television ads that ended with the oddly insistent «My name is Stephen Harper» tag.

What this means for you: When you apply for a loan, we will ask for your business name, address, and Tax Identification Number.

When brainstorming your domain name, there are a few ideas you want to keep in mind: Firstly, you want to brainstorm a few domain names that are keyword - rich, meaning those... Continue Reading

What this means for you — when you enter into a business relationship with PNC Bank, we will ask you your name, street address, tax ID number and other pertinent information that will allow us to identify you.

It's not clear what Fowler means when she says Uber has named or blamed her for the account deletions the company has seen in the wake of her making her allegations public.

So when you start going one step deeper on what are the applications coming out, we talked about some of the social media ones, and they go by names like Steemit and LBRY credits and SingularDTV — I mean there's all these upstart ones that are replicating YouTube and Facebook and other things.

When Minister of the Interior Khvostov (the name means «tail») decided to do away with Rasputin, he found he could not trust his own subordinates, and so contacted Iliodor in Sweden to recruit his followers as assassins.

That extreme version isn't my scene either, but I do like the act of debate and I do enjoy being challenged even when that means people call me names.

I like the way when an atheist give 10 (or sometimes 11) signs that you're a christian, christians just get angry and call us names and tell us we're being mean.

Also, what makes you so sure that when given eternal punishment automatically means eternal in duration and not eternal as meaning that it is just simply in reference to God's punishment because one of the names for God is eternal like Alpha and Omega.

Sometimes it's good to hear it in different words, because when you hear Christ, you're so used to it, you don't even think what it means, you think it's Jesus» last name...

And of course, I agree with the concept that when God said not to take His Name in vain this is exactly what was the primary meaning.

Or how was a man named David, a simple shepherd at one time some 3,000 years ago, able to specify that we are formed by means of a set of detailed instruction within our DNA, that makes each of us unique, saying: «Your (God's) eyes saw even the embryo (up through 56 days after conception) of me, and in your book (the instructions in DNA) all its parts were down in writing, as regards the days when they were formed and there was not yet one (organ) among them»?

Some suggest that when Jesus says «in the name of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit» He means «in my name.»

When the gospel says that God has highly exalted him and has given him a name above every other name, it does not mean that God gave him great privilege and position as a reward.

So when, as a teenager, young Amos Klausner went off to the kibbutz and reinvented himself as «Oz» (which means «boldness»), it was not only a repudiation of his previous name.

To pray «in Jesus's name», basically means «focus on Jesus's person when you pray».

The name, which appears nowhere else and is omitted by Luke even here, means «oil press,» suggesting that when the name was given the oil from the olives grown on the hill was extracted here.

This is not the result of clumsiness or oversight; there is a reason for it, namely the truth - functional stance of modern logic: 1 (a) simply means that the individual named «A» does not satisfy the propositional function in question, i.e., 1 (x), or a true proposition does not emerge when that name is substituted in the argument position.

But that is not at all what Jesus meant, and in fact, mindlessly repeating the words «in Jesus» name» to get what we ask for in prayer is actually the exact opposite of what Jesus meant when He invited us to pray in His name.

So when the Bible says «in the name of...» it means «in the person of...».

No other structure in the world can be called on to promise eternal salvation, and when such salvific claims are made in the name of some nation, race, social class, religion, or ideology, the church must fight such idolatry and blasphemy with all its means of persuasion, even to the point of martyrdom.

Yes, except that usually, when we pray this, what we mean is «Hollowed be they name in and through me.»

Make no mistake: when I critique the church and ministries going on in her name, when I critique other people's ideas and activities, when I let loose on the goings - on in religion, this doesn't mean I hate the perpetuators.

But if the Book of Life contains the names of people who have eternal life, then when Revelation 3:5 talks about blotting someone's name out of the book of life, does this mean it is possible to lose eternal life?

There is no where in any part of Quran or Sunnah where it says people or youth are to be chained... and kept in dungeons... Thisnis ignorance, arrogance and conspiracy done by ill hearted people in the name of religion when it is by no mean a part of religion... I have seen such cases only at remote poor areas when they have mentally sick youth or people who could be dangerous for others and can not afford to hospitalize are being kept chained like that but not in religious establishments, rather at places where fraud witch doctors who claim that those are possessed...!!!

Hi my name is Lindsey and I'm recovering heroin addict and my mother is a very devoted rightous Christian her favorite saying is I am the head and not the tail meaning she is the head is far better than me and I am the tail and because the way Christians have treated me recently through my struggle I have felt that I should convert to Hinduism when I brought this up to my mother she told me I will go to hell because Jesus is the only God which I do believe to an extent but I also believe in having peace within your own life and treating others equally fairly with love respect and dignity which my mother and my sister do not do the act as though they are better than anyone they do not sin they do not make mistakes and they are perfect in every way another one of her favorite sayings I'm not perfect but I'm going to try to be BC Jesus loves me that much.

Some may and do, but I would say most come to also chat about religion and ask the questions that believers don't, that's usually when the name calling starts because believers get up in arms when they have trouble answering the tough questions and accuse any unbelievers of being nasty and mean and trying to get them to stop believing in god.

In John 18:5 - 6 Jesus sais «I AM he» and The power of his declaration of BEING GOD brought them to their knees... This clearly coincides with Exodus 3 when God appeared to Moses and Declared that his NAME was «I AM who I AM» Do you REALLY think that that is not by design??? Is this not also a very clear foreshadowing of the future (Romans 14:11, and Philliapians 2:10 - 11) Please oh please see how the Bible is so intricately intertwined and full of the The masters handiwork... Everything, all of life's questions are all within this book, not other sources, if one but will accept them, pray over them, and get the Lord's guidance... This is why I brought up 1 Cor 2:14, Which you took EXTREMELY out of context in the way I meant it to be discerned, which the verse itself explains I might begrudgingly add... John 8:24 after he tells them I am not of this world.

Perhaps the laughter of Abraham, which turned from cynical to celebratory when his son Isaac was born (the name means «He [God] laughs») would prove a more fruitful source for a biblical theology of play (Gen. 21).

By the italicized this in the last sentence I mean to indicate Jesus Christ himself in the integrity of the event which we designate when we name him.

In a later chapter we shall have occasion to point out that all preaching worthy of the name must be theological, by which I mean that it must be, as the very adjective indicates, «a word about God» and hence about God's decisive action for humankind in the event we name when we say «Jesus Christ.»

VII, pp. 155) When in the New Testament the old historic name «Israel» is applied to this continuous community, it means now not any racial or national group, but simply «the People of God»; that is to say, a community defined solely by its relation to the eternal King of the Universe.

History means primarily civilization, as Metz sees when he says that politics is the new name for civilization.

When she finally bore Jacob a son, she named him «Joseph,» which means, «Do it again,» or «Let there be another.»

Names mean absolutely nothing, especially when CNN doesn't require you to register your name.

When certain writers found it was possible that early Christianity was influenced by the group that produced this material, they immediately concluded this jeopardized Christianity because it meant that it was nothing but old ideas warmed over in the name of Jesus.

When Ferdinand Ebner says that «to speak of God except in a context of prayer is to take his name in vain» it means that to speak of him without yourself being in relationship with him, without seeking and finding again and again, is to talk vaporing nonsense.

Jeff: This is what causes division as we go about doing even good things, out of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil to set up another sect out of our carnal nature; above is the outcome; Jesus came to cause division among men that tries to become their own god and sets up camp, even for them that call themselves Christian, for them that have went from Him and His Words, even that are not of His Spirit: Jesus said; the Words that I speak are Spirit and Life, That means the Words of man can only bring forth death: Therefore; if we do not have His Spirit in us, then we too can only speak forth death: This is what it is to be a believer, we truly believe our Lord: I can see what the Catholic church and her daughters are doing to form a religious Babylonian city: Even as God caused a division in Babylon in the past because the peoples became great, so to is it now with all of the man made sects of religion: But when we are filled with the Spirit of God then we can not help but to live for God: It is written; those who are led by His spirit are His children: Thank - you Jeff: Those who are of His Spirit will know these truths, those who are not of His Spirit truly believe a believer is as they and can not know what we speak, because they live in unbelief: Thank - you again Jeff; In Jesus Name Alexandria: P.S..

He's talking more about me because when I call him an idiot he thinks I'm being mean and resorting to name calling, but is stating a fact really name calling?

And finally Methuselah, whose very name was prophetic meaning, «when I'm gone you are too» (not a perfect translation).

Applied to sacraments, it means that the Jesus - event is causally efficacious during those occasions when the sacraments are administered in his name.

I think much more needs to be researched on this question, but if she actually perpetuated or failed to alleviate the suffering of others when she had the means to do so, in the name of a twisted view of the religious value of suffering, she is very much in reproach in my opinion.

Decisions had to be made from time to time as to where or when services of the church would be held; the church needed to be told of the impending visit of an apostle, or of some prophet or teacher from abroad; a question has been raised as to the good faith of one of these visitors, and there must be some discussion of the point and a decision on it; a fellow Christian from another church is on a journey and needs hospitality; a member of the local congregation planning to visit a church abroad needs a letter of introduction to that church, which someone must be authorized to provide; a serious dispute about property rights or some other legal matter has arisen between two of the brothers and the church must name someone to help them settle the issue or must in some other way deal with it; a new local magistrate has begun to prosecute Christians for violating the law against unlicensed assembly, and consideration must be given to ways and means of meeting this crisis; charges have been brought against one of the members by another member, and these must be investigated and perhaps some disciplinary action taken; one of the members has died, and the church is called on for some special action in behalf of his family in the emergency; differences of opinion exist in the church on certain questions of morals or belief (such as marriage and divorce, or the resurrection), differences which local prophets and teachers are apparently unable to compose, and a letter must be written to the apostle — who will write this letter and what exactly will it say?

After listening to Dr. Graham all of these year I'm very sad to see that one would compromise the very name of Jesus for the sake of politic, When you know that the Mormon faith is oppose to the teachings of Jesus Christ, and when you are opposed to the teachings of Jesus, that means you are anti-Christ,,,,,, Very disappoinWhen you know that the Mormon faith is oppose to the teachings of Jesus Christ, and when you are opposed to the teachings of Jesus, that means you are anti-Christ,,,,,, Very disappoinwhen you are opposed to the teachings of Jesus, that means you are anti-Christ,,,,,, Very disappointed.

And when I say «meat», I mean, dead animals of all kinds in various forms: pigs, rabbits, frogs, ducks, cows, you name it.