Sentences with phrase «names we mention here»

Due to all of the names mentioned here, we know that these events happen somewhere between September of 27 A.D. and October of 28 A.D. [1] But aside from including these names to set the date for us, Luke includes them to show how far Israel had fallen.

While it's likely true that most if not all of the names mentioned here are in the running, being «in the running» could still mean anything from a mere name being tossed around at a meeting to an actual top choice.

Not exact matches

After the Holy Torah scripture and the Holy Gospel that came before as above mentioned now here comes the mention of the Holy Scriptures that succeeded it and named as the Holy Quran;

aside from several other internal evidences to the contrary (as i mentioned before, look up the pool of Bethesda), here is an extra-biblical corroboration of the immediate context regarding names.

I won't mention the name of the book here, but suffice it to say that the author, a prominent church leader, had some pretty bizarre views of heaven, and more specifically, of hell.

Since only a very few of these have been translated and are therefore available for reading by the general reader, the names of the individual books which constitute each division are not given here.4 Only a few can be mentioned, and that but briefly, only enough to reveal the general nature of the literature.

The peasants who have now banded together in Swabia have formulated their intolerable grievances against the rulers in twelve articles, and have undertaken to support them with certain passages of Scripture... the thing that pleases me most... is that they offer to accept instructions... Since I have a reputation for being one of those who deal with the Holy Scriptures here on earth, and especially as one whom they mention and call upon by name in the second document, I have all the more courage and confidence in openly publishing my instruction.

Of all the possible names here we will mention only that of our own teacher, the moderately conservative Joachim Jeremias, who deserves to be heard on this point, if only because he has done more than any other single scholar to add to our knowledge of the historical Jesus.

Jennifer - I didn't realize it was you leaving these comments until you mentioned the name of your daughter here.

Can we all please get over fabregas and stop mentioning his name on here?

I am sick and tired of hearing Morata's and Vardy's names still mentioned here, even if it as a reference point... We need to move on and concentrate on realistic targets.

I even thought top clubs were in for him.Some three or 2 seasons back many here were debating why he should be our main striker.As soon as you mention any other strikers name people would come out with stats and many things defending him.Even Wenger has defended him blindly in the past.People say Wenger's stubborn yeah.But don't we know that there's a reason why everything happens?Honestly speaking he's the reason why Arsene Wenger has failed to sign a top notch striker because he still believes in him.The funny thing is we signed Welbeck at that time who to me did nothing before to be the main man here.People keep saying Welbeck is hardworking and that he works his socks off.But the question is was that our reason for signing him.Welbeck being signed to challenge Giroud tells me a lot about Giroud's quality.Even Walcott (no offence to him) who has zero CF qualities was even chosen over him for a string of games and all in all I think he did well but has too many defeciencies for that role.We've compromised as a club and it'll come back to bite us.

In the midfield, (including RWB & LWB) we have a whole bunch of tweeners... none offer the full package, none make sense in our manager's current favourite formation, except for Sead on the left and Ox on the right, and all of them have never shown any consistency for more than a heartbeat... Sead, who I'm including in this category because of our present formation, looks like a positive addition, minus his occasional brain farts, but I would rather see what he could do in a back 4 before making my mind up... Ox, who has never played better, which isn't saying much considering his largely underwhelming play in previous seasons, seems to have found a home in this new formation; unfortunately, can we really expect this oft - injured player to handle the taxing duties that come with said position over the long haul, not to mention, it looks like he has no intention of staying... Ramsey has relied on the empathy that stems from his gruesome injury years ago and the excitement that was generated a few years back when he finally seemed to put in altogether, but on the whole he has been a big disappointment (neither he nor the Ox have scored enough to warrant a regular spot)... Wiltshire should be put on a weekly contract then played until he suffers his first injury, if and when that occurs he should be shipped - out and no one should very be allowed to say his name on club grounds ever again... Elnehy & Coq are average players who couldn't make any of the top 7 teams currently in the EPL... both have showed some great energy on the pitch, but neither are top quality and no good team can afford to have that many average players on their bench playing the same position, especially with Coq's injury history / discipline concerns and Elheny's headless chicken tendencies... as for Xhaka, his tenure here so far has been incredibly underwhelming... we know he has some skills to provide the long ball but his defensive work is piss poor and he gives the ball away too cheaply and far too often... finally, the enigma himself, Ozil, so much skill with his left foot but his presence has been more frustrating than uplifting... in many respects his failure has been directly related to the failure of this club to provide him with the necessary players up front, minus Sanchez of course, and unless something drastic happens very soon his legacy will be largely a negative one (much like Wenger's)

You didn't mention Costa by name but the comparison is commonplace on here.

... its been a long while since anyone mention his name... He used to be such a crowd favourite here..

I get what you are saying but I just do nt see any coach who has actually watched Giroud note I said who's actually watched Giroud to pay above 20mill for him.Trust me when the time comes for him to go we ai nt gonna get a lot of cash.i also expect him to be going to a lesser team and not a top team.Trust me he's really lucky to be an Arsenal player as some of our playrrs here are.I don't want to mention names because my blood boils up when I even think of them in the team.There are so many players in this team I don't rate but hey I guess I got ta keep em to myself.Sadly Giroud is one of them.It's not like I hate or I refuse to see the light but it's just that my eyes are telling me he's average when I watch him.So if anything please blame my eyes.

There are a few other players who simply have not materialized into anything special, I won't mention names but here we are supposed to be a club gunning for CL titles, nevermind domestic trophies.

whos this REUS character youve mentioned - he sounds familiar - never seen his name on here — is he good?

I bet u I'll enjoy reading wellbeck's injury setback than this rubbish u waste your precious time and energy to writE about «The King of Sacking» pls don't always bring his shadow close to Arsenal bcos we don't know him that's why I dnt mention his name here cos he doesn't worth it... you know him... #Loud mouth sacking king

Do they even watch football or they just come here and mention names randomly?

There are two guys here whose name i will not mention they think they are so wise and always make up excuses.I feel sorry for them because they live their lives in lies honestly speaking.Its a pity that peeps have to be like this.This is part of the mental barrier that has been holding this club.Not being honest and and acting in accordance with truth.I feel sorry for them.Well you can alway shave the pleasure of saying I told you so.

Now I will mention just one name and shame the fellow: someone here who goes by the name @Nokia actually called Sanchez «crap» and went further to say he (Sanchez) was merely a glorified Gervinho, after the game.

Some of us begged and hoped Arsene concluded any deal he intended a week or two into the opening of the market, but some guys here (won't mention name, they know themselves) called us clueless and that Arsene has been in the game long enough to know what he's doing.

While I'm extremely positive about a lot of the names you've mentioned futures with us here, or elsewhere I'd prefer we invested in another deadly winger and there's no shortage of names that are rumored to be available.

I have been reading comments of fans on here, especially those who have chosen to appreciate the average in ability that a striker like giroud possess, my question for ya all is, when did arsenal become a team so low on profile to sing praise of a striker who no one can rank among the top 3 striker in the league, I have seen an arsenal team with a striking force with players like, anelka, Wright, Henry, v persie, no one can rank giroud or whatever his name is in the category of my mentioned strikers.we all have got to face it, giroud is not good enough to be leading the attack of a team dreaming of winning the league, and Henry is right saying arsenal can't win the league with giroud as our striker,,, check this out, man u won league titles with strikers like Rooney, van nisteroy, v persie, man city won with aguero, Chelsea with drogba and now Costa, giroud stand no chance against any of those.let's stop appreciating mediocrity, wenger should get us a good striker as giroud is damn too average for arsenal

Of course it's not though and we're still struggling to score because most of the passes are backwards (Not mentioning any names here).

How could you have come out here to call him clueless??? I won't mention names, but I'm certain you know yourselves.

The Marlins traded Giancarlo Stanton to the Yankees for prospects whose names don't even need to be mentioned here because you'll forget who they are five minutes later, anyway.

Just trolling you mate, don't watch that much Scottish premier league as am sure many guys here don't, so I wouldn't know the names you mentioned.

Yh right.Dont talk like that its irritating like the are no strikers out there better than him.It is a saying that the truth will set you free.Giroud is on the level of average but arsenal have made him look very good only a few will see it.Those who actually watch his every move even without the ball and on it.If i mention the strikers i will take over Giroud some of you here will call me stupid.Listen if Wenger cant sign a striker he should just get Charlie Austin he can finish off chances and he is a good striker, He can be world class if he works hard.Only a matter of time before he proves to the world what they have been but its like just his name does not excite fans.He is even light ahead of Giroud and a neutral would be saying the same thing if he was watching them on tv always.

Also funny how some guys (wont mention names) only pop - up here when we loose and still claim to be true Arsenal supporters.

I was informed my name was mentioned on here more than once and I presume Zee is Red Arse or Henry B, as I have lost count.

I will cut Eriksen some slack here seeing as it was his first start since his lay off, but I hardly remember hearing his name mentioned?

Mention of Soldado's name on here recently drew an apathetic response, so maybe he isn't our man in any event?

However, this morning I found two new comments on the blog left by a reader named Dana — whom, I should mention at the outset, is not Dana Woldow, the San Francisco school food reformer who often comments here and is no great fan of Jamie.

You mentioned a girl named Iyen (or Ayen), and you were wondering if she indeed married the prince, well in case you're interested to know, here's her story, or rather her side of the story http://www.newsflash.org/2004/02/sb/sb003465.htm (The 2nd wife of the prince, Evangeline del Rosario is also a Filipina.)

The name «Jagvi» sounds good but i am not able to get its meaning... here it is mentioned that Jagvi means WORLDLY.

Ms. Rose's name has also been mentioned for the seat, as has that of Democratic Brooklyn Councilman Vincent Gentile, who used to represent part of the Island in the state Senate and maintains political roots here.

The viewpoints expressed here do not necessarily represent those of NEIWPCC or NYSDEC, nor does mention of trade names, commercial products, or causes constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.

A friend of mine Imran khan who is the second parkistani that has contributed to this discovery, his name should also be mentioned here.

We have someone here that just does not enjoy vegetables (We won't mention any names as we don't want to embarrass Matt) so we work hard to find ways to make them taste great.

I am not clear about what the guidelines here are about mentioning specific product names, so I will not unless asked.

Thank you so much for the mention too - I am honestly truly overwhelmed to see my name in a blog post written by such a fab and talented lady: --RRB- Here's hoping that Percy and Reed product is good stuff: --RRB- xxxx

As I mentioned in a previous post, I did a parcel exchange with a lovely lady named Katrina over at www.mommaknowsbest04.blogspot.co.uk so head on over there after here.

On any given Saturday or Sunday at our house, it's a pretty good bet that you'll find Chandler (my husband — I don't think I mention his actual name a lot around here) in the kitchen, beer in hand, a little mix of Ice Cube and T - Swift, and maybe some Creedence blasting (there's a little something for everyone),...

This may be controversial mentioned here, but it is way too shimmery to use as a face powder, no matter the name.

As you'll see in the comments here, there is no «one way» to have an arrangement, hence the possibilities... We've got some very creative sugar daddies and sugar babies on this blog, need I mention their names?

The songs on here are more upbeat and catchy than what we've heard from The Shins before, with songs like Name for You and Painting a Hole, and even the two «duds» I mentioned earlier.

The film doesn't hold your hand, and while Cave may drop a first name here or there, or make mention of a band or hit single, there's nothing on screen spelling out for you a traditional Behind the Music - friendly history of Nick Cave.

So, while I doubt 90 % of the names and titles I mention below will be hearing their names come Thursday morning, here would be my personal picks if I were allowed to vote.