For instance, articles like this one do explain the difference between broad and
narrow arbitration clauses, but I don't have enough of a legal background to interpret the rather technical language.
Not exact matches
Here is a sample
clause for a broad scope of an
arbitration clause: «Any dispute, controversy, or claim relating to, connected with, or arising out of this Agreement...» Here are two for
narrow scope: «All disputes arising under this Agreement...» [precludes
arbitration of matters that, while related to the agreement, do not arise out of it] «Any...
Here is a sample
clause for a broad scope of an
arbitration clause: «Any dispute, controversy, or claim relating to, connected with, or arising out of this Agreement...» Here are two for
narrow scope:
In - depth reasoning as to why
arbitration clauses should typically be broad as opposed to
narrow is available here: http://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2012/05/25/scope-of-
arbitration-
clauses-and-carve-out-
clauses-erring-on-the-side-of-caution-or-on-the-side-of-daring/.