You can't be too
narrow minded in your career search.
Anyway, back to the topic in hand - in short, I think with so many books out there you're not being
narrow minded in choosing not to read the Left Behind series and, frankly, considering you'd probably only get into a disagreement with your friend about them if you did, it's probably prudent of you not to!
I believe that the church defnitely doesn't accomodate all these phases and perhaps to try and do that will be greedy and
narrow minded in the sense that it confine the work of God to what happens inside the institutional church.
its not really atheism or religion that I have a problem with, its the hate, control, and fear that goes along with it that I have a problem with, you say that those who are spiritual are into new agey, crystal ball, stuff, see that's what I'm talking about, you assume to know what something is about when you don't understand something you naturally fear it, your self righteous clouds you, don't you get that by being
narrow minded in your view towards things, you really act no better than religious fundamentalists, being spiritual is a lot more than just the new agey, think positive all the time that you think it is, its about being aware of who you are?
Not exact matches
But focus, by definition,
narrows the scope of our thinking, and given how complex and fast moving most business problems are, we should relearn the skill of simply opening our
mind and giving ourselves half an hour to think,
in an unstructured, creative way, about whatever pops up.
Former Harvard president Larry Summers called the program «the single most misdirected philanthropy
in this decade,» according to TechCrunch, while Slate Group chairman Jacob Weisberg wrote
in Newsweek, «Thiel fellows will have the opportunity to emulate their sponsor by halting their intellectual development around the onset of adulthood, maintaining a
narrow -
minded focus on getting rich as young as possible and thereby avoid the siren lure of helping others or pursuing knowledge for its own sake.»
Being alert and focused
narrows the
mind's thought process, often causing one to fixate on the same solution, which certainly has its place
in a typical work day.
Peoples» attention has been distracted into speculation about of how they might get rich
in a parallel universe that might exist
in theory — if one accepts the
narrow -
minded assumptions that are being taught — but whose most important real - world consequence is to impose a debt spiral on America and other nations.
Never
mind that this is only
in the
narrowest technical sense.
The common image of Calvinism — and I hear it portrayed
in this way often, even by people who know some things about theology — is that the religion of John Calvin is a mean - spirited,
narrow -
minded perspective where a nasty God decides to save a few people while arbitrarily consigning the vast portion of the human race to eternal suffering.
(insert your own, southerners backwoods joke here) So Mendel fails,
in my
mind, to adequately account for the very
narrow gene pool (read single - celled organism) that the theory of evolution begins with.
In the
minds of every member of the coalition: big business, evangelicals, libertarians, neo-conservatives, etc. this is there chance to take over and carry through their
narrow agenda.
btw, Atheists are too
narrow -
Minded IMHO, I am NOT Atheist (technically not even possible
in this context)
If atheists believe that that there is no faith to be held, that belief
in no faith IS their faith... and,
in turn, voids their humanistic,
narrow -
minded views.
Those who are dogmatic
in their religious beliefs are criticized for being
narrow minded, and ironically you are of similar
mind.
If not, he's
narrow -
minded in a way that Newt Gingrich, who has changed denominations, is not.
Atheist are the most
narrow minded people I know
in everyday life.
Now, I realize I am now automatically dismissed as a
narrow -
minded zealot by the «free thinkers» on this site, but, if one is Christian and believes
in the veracity of Christian tenets, then it is * illogical * to consider that other paths are equally valid.
You will laugh and celebrate because
in your eyes a
narrow -
minded «religious» company was destroyed.
I agree when you are show casing
narrow minded traditions
in church, and I am all for that, but now you are removing one of the most clearly attested teachings of the NT.
And to all the
narrow -
minded folk using this comment post to vent about their distrust / disbelief of God; let it go, find a Christian, and experience the Gospel
in all its messiness, worldly illogicality, and simple Awe - inspiring relief.
Anyone who is that blind to their own bigotry, who is that
narrow minded and holds that much hatred and contempt for other people, just because of who they are, can't possibly come to their senses
in a short blog conversation.
I hope I see it
in my lifetime, but getting the
narrow -
minded religious zealots to accept ALL people for their respective religious beliefs or non-beliefs is no small task.
God are you so
narrow minded to the point of not possibly take this
in consideration?
The
narrow minded fools with their ideals firmly rooted
in the 15th century are not my idea of competent leaders.
Its just plan stupid and a waste of time, if you believe
in god or buddah or allah or anyother good thats great for you and if you do not believe
in a god thats great too, Whats one big problem that i cant understand is why people are so
narrow minded on both sides of the specturm and even within different religions.
Group polarization happens when,
in the absence of diverse influences, homogenous group members tend to adopt more extreme and
narrow -
minded thinking as time passes.
Else the discussion would be poisoned, because it would have to be supposed that the opponent is stupid or
narrow -
minded; and
in this case we could no longer realize that such disputes also have a moral element, namely love, respect for the other's attitude and tolerance.
Charlotte's
narrow -
minded neuroscience professor, Dr. Starling, uses the word «soul» only
in quotation marks.
You are so
narrow minded, intransigent (look it up
in the dictionary), and without any ability to think outside of your little «box» called the bible.
Narrow minded, behind the times, and using empty words to get
in some (brainless) cheap shots.
That is exactly the unflinching
narrow minded BS, that is and will, minimize further any political influence the Chistian Right will have
in the the future.
In considering possibilities, I guess you are pretty
narrow -
minded and unimaginative.
SO, since your
mind is obvously too
narrow to understand the POINT of the article
in mentioning the paragraph you quote, I will try to explain it.
My only hope is that someday when the «little green men» come and visit us, the
narrow minded among us will finally realize that we are not part of some «master plan» and just another lucky coincidence
in the universe.
The lines are so big that doctors (or nurses) are not able to see them
in one day... You are so
narrow -
minded man... hope you never get sick!!!
That is rich — after trying their best to marginalize everybody
in this country who doesn't follow their
narrow minded vision, they start to squeal at the first sign that their time at the top has finally passed.
If we Christians were truly the evil racist, bigotted and
narrow -
minded beings that you claim we are, I would wonder at the miracle of an Atheist still continueing to exist
in America.
Oh why waste my time here trying to get someone as
narrow minded as yourself to understand the fantasies
in your head as just that.
How
narrow minded are today's scientists
in their logistics regarding spatial relativisms!
He who often thinks of God, will have a larger
mind than the man who simply plods around this
narrow globe... The most excellent study for expanding the soul, is the science of Christ, and Him crucified, and the knowledge of the Godhead
in the glorious Trinity.
The problem with these elders are a
narrow minded view of scripture, but the issue is
in their stubborness, not
in the scriptures.
The Editor
in the Preface says that the Tract «polemises against a form of
narrow sectarian Secularism which refuses to be sensitive to tradition and faith» and argues that Secularism needs to be rethought taking religious faith seriously, that «only then can Secularism reclaim the ideological space which Fundamentalists are threatening to take over, only then can Secularists capture the
minds of the people» (p.vi).
Atheists are the most
narrow minded people I know
in my life so far.
With complete naivete they answer that that part of the revelation that they have encountered up till now is self - evident and reasonable, but the revelation
in Christ that now touches them is
narrow -
minded and uncertain.
What if your son or daughter told you they were gay?Would you follow your
narrow -
minded, religious bigotry, and curse them to hell?Or, could you find a way to change your
mind and continue to love them?Would you slap your kid
in the face and kick them out of the house and ask your god why he is so cruel to little - old you?Do yourself a favour and spend a moment thinking on this subject before you spout your hate - fulll nonsense again... and for crying out loud, LAY OFF THE KFC!!
Although his general observation is interesting at best, the problem though, is that all of his supporting arguments are nothing more than judgmental
in the most
narrow -
minded way.
To give you an example of just how
narrow minded they are when
in power, Stalin was so obsessed with wiping out rival factions of communists and socialists and anarchists
in the Spanish Civil War that he lost the war!
He was born
in western New York, the son of a clergyman who was a
narrow -
minded, strait - laced, Calvinistic dogmatist.
Both ignore the Teachings of their respective Faiths,
in order to lure the unwary into lining their Coffers, and to promote hatred, bigotry, and
narrow -
minded goose - stepping to their charismatic Leaders calls.