Not exact matches
«Convergence and harmonization means... Canada bending its regulations or simply adopting U.S. federal regulations, and I ask the
question: at what
point does the
narrowing of policy room to manoeuvre fundamentally compromise democratic accountability
in our political system?»
At this
point Cobb might be tempted to make one last ditch stand, arguing that I have begged the
question by merely assuming that a structured society can not be an enduring object, whereas what he is saying, when he says that one regional standpoint can include another, is that one enduring entity, one nonspatial, serially ordered society, can still be a structured society
in that its temporally successive occasions can include the regional standpoints of the «
narrower» actual entities which make up its subordinate societies and / or nexus.
Along the way it will be necessary to gore a familiar ox or two; however, since my analysis
points to the conclusion that Victor Lowe and those who follow him have understood the
questions surrounding Whitehead and Bergson
in terms too
narrow to accommodate the whole truth
in this matter, including Gunter's thesis.
As it is, Louis van Gaal's luck was
in as Mata gave United a
narrow win and that means that the pressure is still on us and City to keep going and pick up the
points needed to make sure that United do not sneak
in and claim the final Champions League place, but the
question now is which of us will handle that pressure better?
This had appeared to show a
narrowing of the Conservative lead last month, but this month seems to be back to normal — when David Cameron and Gordon Brown's names are included
in the
question the Conservative lead grows to 7
points, 39 % to 32 %.
In the end of Lars Nittve's essay for Hanson's exhibition at Rooseum in 1995 (which Nittve curated), he writes:»... To Hanson, though, the main question is likely something different: how to find the precise point of resistance, of friction, of dissonance, that will allow him once again to put the maximum pressure on convention — on painting; that will make you feel that the art's narrow constraints are about to burst wide open; or, to use a well - worn but wonderful cliché, that will make the art sing»
In the end of Lars Nittve's essay for Hanson's exhibition at Rooseum
in 1995 (which Nittve curated), he writes:»... To Hanson, though, the main question is likely something different: how to find the precise point of resistance, of friction, of dissonance, that will allow him once again to put the maximum pressure on convention — on painting; that will make you feel that the art's narrow constraints are about to burst wide open; or, to use a well - worn but wonderful cliché, that will make the art sing»
in 1995 (which Nittve curated), he writes:»... To Hanson, though, the main
question is likely something different: how to find the precise
point of resistance, of friction, of dissonance, that will allow him once again to put the maximum pressure on convention — on painting; that will make you feel that the art's
narrow constraints are about to burst wide open; or, to use a well - worn but wonderful cliché, that will make the art sing».
If you haven't found anything
in the journals on linearity of the effect of those molecules at 10x concentration — assuming you've asked a good reference librarian for help and she's not been able to find anything to answer you — I'd speculate that nobody's published on that
narrow question because all the other feedbacks at that
point would be so complex as to muddy the waters, so to speak.