Sentences with phrase «narrow stance width»

Comparing squats with different stance widths, Escamilla et al. (2001b) found that muscle activity was greater in narrow stance width squats compared to wide stance width squats.

Comparing the effect of squats with different stance widths, Escamilla et al. (2001a) reported no differences in hip moment arm lengths between the narrow, medium, and wide stance width squats at any point in the lowering and lifting phases, except at 45 degrees of knee flexion in the lifting phase, when the medium and wide stance width squats displayed greater hip moment arm lengths than narrow stance width squats.

Comparing different stance widths, both McCaw and Melrose (1999) and Paoli et al. (2009) found that muscle activity was greater during squats with a wide stance width compared to those with a narrower stance width.

Not exact matches

In profound moments of insight we are accorded a width of understanding and sympathy capable of including and transforming the narrower subjective stances of much of our past.

Most of bodybuilders only rely on traditional squat, and that's a good thing, we're not saying it is not, but what we can suggest is to try and use more squat stances (wide stance, narrow stance and shoulder - width stance).

Stand with your torso straight and your legs spaced using a shoulder width or narrower stance.

I opt to have them stand in a wider than shoulder width and then with their feet together in a narrow stance when performing reps.

For example, Satan Calves 6 / 6/6 would be 6 reps at shoulder width, then 6 reps at a wide stance, followed by 6 reps at a narrow stance done consecutively.

The deadlift should start with a slightly narrower stance than shoulder width.

Assessing the phase of movement, Escamilla et al. (2001) compared the back squat performed with either a narrow or wide (1 vs. 2 times hip width) stance with loads equal to the 12RM.

Comparing the effects of squats with different stance widths, Escamilla et al. (2001a) did not report actual peak ankle plantar flexion angles, but they did report more heavily - angled shanks in narrow stance squats compared to wide stance squats.

Comparing the effects of squats with different stance widths, Escamilla et al. (2001a) reported that peak ankle plantar flexor moments did not differ between narrow and medium stance squats but were much larger in magnitude during wide stance squats.

Comparing the effects of squats with different stance widths, Escamilla et al. (2001a) compared narrow, medium and wide stance back squats and found that peak knee angles did not differ between variations.

Fourthly, squats can be classified by hip angles, which lead to different stance widths (wide, medium or narrow) and foot positions (neutral or outwardly rotated feet).

Assessing stance width, Escamilla et al. (2001) compared the back squat with stance widths equal to 1 and 2.0 times hip width with loads equal to the 12RM and found that the narrow stance produced superior gastrocnemius muscle activity compared to the wide stance during the back squat.

Comparing the effects of squats with different stance widths, Escamilla et al. (2001a) compared narrow, medium and wide stance back squats and found that peak trunk angles did not differ between variations.

Comparing the effect of squats with different stance widths, Escamilla et al. (2001a) reported differences in ankle moment arm lengths between narrow, medium, and wide stance width squats at most points in the lowering and lifting phases.

Comparing squats with different stance widths, Escamilla et al. (2001b) found no differences in ground reaction forces between squats with wide and narrow stances (with the same absolute loads).

Similarly, McCaw and Melrose (1999), Escamilla et al. (2001b), and Paoli et al. (2009) all found no differences in muscle activity between narrow and wide stance width squats (using the same absolute load).