Sentences with phrase «nasa did»

Nasa did not request help in trying to observe the damaged area with ground telescopes or satellites, in part because it did not believe the pictures would be useful, whereas, on the first space shuttle launch in 1981, Columbia lost a few tiles and Nasa had requested the use of ground telescopes and satellites.

Only after great deliberation at nasa did we decide that it was in the best interest of science to look really hard at those 400 stars that have interesting candidate planets.

«A lot of what NOAA and Nasa do right now is focused on measuring the Earth's climate and atmospheric effects of climate change,» he tells Chemistry World.

They yahoos are rallying around this and trying to make the point that if Nasa does not allow other parties to check the data and see the original alogrithms, then NASA is keeping secrets.

Not exact matches

Nasa was right to do what they did.

Nasa has gone out of its way to make the food look more familiar, using green LEDs as well as more efficient red and blue ones in order to make the lettuce turn more green and less red than it otherwise would do.

Today, the people deciding what to send hurtling into the solar system don't always work for nasa.

The new chairman of the appropriations subcommittee that fund Nasa and the NSF, Republican John Culberson, has reportedly recently reiterated that the earth sciences don't meet his definition of «the pure sciences».

Well, apparently Nasa told me that the craft that went to the moon didn't get radiation because they went between the sun flair's, and spent only a few minutes in the Van Allen Belt's, despite the fact that their craft's bulkhead and hul was only made of ligthweight aluminium based steel sheeting, 2.8 th of mil thick, and no one yet has been able to predict or map the flares from the sun.

My previous description of the basic plot doesn't even mention the star of the movie, Cade Yeager (Mark Wahlberg), the new young heroine played by Isabela Moner, supporting roles by Anthony Hopkins (as the leader of the Witwiccans), Jerrod Carmichael (as Cade's assistant), John Turturro (reprising his role from the first three films), Josh Duhamel (also reprising his role from the previous films, but this time as a spy), Tony Hale (as a Nasa JPL nerd), Glenn Morshower (reprising his military role), and many others.

A question: I have a vague memory of years ago someone «denier / pseudo stats dude» was hassling nasa / giss for their raw data of what they used to feed in the avg / mean models for global temps... saying that the adjustments being made was being done to over-state the extent of warming?

It makes me sad that Nasa would be so careless to title any article in this way knowing that many people don't bother to read the article which allows them to draw erroneous conclusions.

Tomcat October 19, 2012 at 3:37 am said:» You have completely missed the point here Stefan, which is that Myrrh is trying to tell us that Nasa et al don't realize we get warmth from the sun»

Tomcat October 19, 2012 at 3:37 am You have completely missed the point here Stefan, which is that Myrrh is trying to tell us that Nasa et al don't realize we get warmth from the sun.

You have completely missed the point here Stefan, which is that Myrrh is trying to tell us that Nasa et al don't realize we get warmth from the sun.

Nasa just settle for multi-year averaging and if you do it that way you see a different shape at the curve end.

Hopefully now you'll also drop your laughable strawman that says Nasa or anyone else doesn't see that either.

Yet they also note that Nasa scientists doing similar work are much more open.

You can take out data points you don't like, you can apply whatever correction factors you want (such as the one that Nasa's GISTEMP series uses to compensate for the dearth of measuring stations across the Arctic), and you can therefore end up with a temperature curve that might look a little different: but don't say it can't be done, because it can.

Did a Google search on gavin schmidt nasa.

Ok — lets generalize then - one group is saying that there is a significant amount of damage being done to the biosphere through human activity to warrant concern - this group is made up of atmospheric scientists, biologists, physicists, oceanographers, Nasa climate scientists, National Science Academies, WMO etc

I have found the work at Surfacestations.org to be extremely illuminating when you look at the exact conditions of a weather station versus what Nasa / Noaa does with outdated satellite information.

One of my pet peeves is the moronic thing Brit newspapers do where they spell things like NASA as «Nasa».

The study was done by Drew Shindell, formerly of Nasa, now professor of climate sciences at Duke University, and Chair of the Scientific Advisory Panel to the Climate and Clean Air Coalition.

Steven, I don't know why you keep talking about skeptics, the hearing is about asking Nasa to explain it's adjustments and methods.

Following on from the Nasa Aqua data finding that the Earth is not getting any warmer even though computer models state that it would, how does that tie up with global warming not being debunked?