Sentences with phrase «national court litigation»

Funding for stand - alone or umbrella claims in national court litigation or funding for «follow - on» actions flowing from regulatory decisions in specialist forums, such as the Competition Appeal Tribunal in the UK.

Not exact matches

The Trans Mountain Expansion Project is still before the National Energy Board (NEB)(see the comment by Kirk Lambrecht QC here) and all the while spawning lots of litigation, some in the Federal Court of Appeal and some in the provincial superior courts.

I have commented on most of that litigation in «Pipelines, the National Energy Board and the Federal Court» (2015), 3 Energy Regulation Quarterly 59 — 73.

The successes of the adequacy movement in state courts thus are to be seen as stepping stones to the broader arena of national legislation and litigation.

And further, this attack is coupled with the transparent threat that the National Review intends to undertake burdensome and abusive litigation tactics should Dr. Mann have the temerity to attempt to defend himself in court.

In the absence of a court adjudicating what equity requires of nations in setting their national climate change commitments, a possibility but far from a guarantee under existing international and national law (for an explanation of some of the litigation issues, Buiti, 2011), the best hope for encouraging nations to improve the ambition of their national emissions reductions commitments on the basis of equity and justice is the creation of a mechanism under the UNFCCC that requires nations to explain their how they quantitatively took equity into account in establishing their INDCs and why their INDC is consistent with the nation's ethical obligations to people who are most vulnerable to climate change and the above principles of international law.

We have two veteran court watchers as guests: Tony Mauro, Supreme Court reporter for Legal Times and American Lawyer Media, and Rex S. Heinke, head of the national appellate and litigation strategy group of Akin Gump Straus -LSBcourt watchers as guests: Tony Mauro, Supreme Court reporter for Legal Times and American Lawyer Media, and Rex S. Heinke, head of the national appellate and litigation strategy group of Akin Gump Straus -LSBCourt reporter for Legal Times and American Lawyer Media, and Rex S. Heinke, head of the national appellate and litigation strategy group of Akin Gump Straus -LSB-...]

Best Lawyers in America for Commercial Litigation and Litigation — Real Estate (2013 - present) Best Lawyers in America — 2016 Lawyer of the Year for Real Estate in Billings, MT Best Lawyers In America — 2017 Lawyer of the Year for Real Estate and Commercial Litigation Mountain States Super Lawyers (2014 - Present) AV Preeminent Rating by Martindale - Hubbell Order of Barristers Award Edward A. Cremer, III Environmental Law Award Member, Montana Law Review Member, National Moot Court Team Clyde Augustus Duniway Award for Outstanding Student Achievement (Colorado College)

Mr. Martin has significant experience in handling labor - litigation cases before the National Labor Relations Commission and the Court of Appeals.

Served as trial counsel for a major national manufacturer in a lengthy NLRB proceeding in which the client prevailed on bad faith bargaining, secondary boycott and threat of violence charges against the Teamsters Union, secured three separate federal court injunctions against the Union and won an unprecedented award of attorneys» fees and litigation costs [reported at 334 NLRB No. 137]

We have two veteran court watchers as guests: Tony Mauro, Supreme Court reporter for Legal Times and American Lawyer Media, and Rex S. Heinke, head of the national appellate and litigation strategy group of Akin Gump Straus Hauer and court watchers as guests: Tony Mauro, Supreme Court reporter for Legal Times and American Lawyer Media, and Rex S. Heinke, head of the national appellate and litigation strategy group of Akin Gump Straus Hauer and Court reporter for Legal Times and American Lawyer Media, and Rex S. Heinke, head of the national appellate and litigation strategy group of Akin Gump Straus Hauer and Feld.

He has served on numerous committees, including the PPSC's National Litigation Committee and the British Columbia Court of Appeal's Criminal Appeals Advisory Committee.

The Maine management labor lawyers have depth and experience in all labor law and litigation forums, to include state and federal courts, as well as administrative agencies such as the National Labor Relations Board, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Maine Human Rights Commission, OSHA and the Department of Labor.

Langdon & Emison's reputation as a national leader in auto product liability litigation comes from 30 years of taking on the world's largest auto manufacturers in courtrooms from coast to coast, including the U.S. Supreme Court.

She completed a clerkship with the Pueblo of Isleta Appellate Court in Albuquerque, New Mexico and an internship with the Aboriginal Litigation Management Group at the Department of Justice, the former Indian Claims Commission, the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal, and the Department of National Defence Ombudsman's Office, Legal Unit.

Through our technical knowledge and litigation expertise in federal and state courts, the US International Trade Commission and national and international arbitration forums, we provide our clients with the right blend of talent for the modern era of high - stakes, high - tech trade secrets litigation.

Our lawyers spend a significant amount of time in labor and employment litigation, which includes the defense of employment discrimination and wrongful discharge cases in federal and state courts, arbitration proceedings, the defense of individual employment contract actions, and proceedings before various state and federal administrative agencies, including the National Labor Relations Board, United States, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania Departments of Labor, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, New Jersey Division on Civil Rights, the Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission, and OSHA.

The National Court Reporters Association realizes that in some cases, court reporters are providing uncertified draft transcripts, in either paper or ASCII form, to parties involved in litigation either in the courtroom or deposition setCourt Reporters Association realizes that in some cases, court reporters are providing uncertified draft transcripts, in either paper or ASCII form, to parties involved in litigation either in the courtroom or deposition setcourt reporters are providing uncertified draft transcripts, in either paper or ASCII form, to parties involved in litigation either in the courtroom or deposition setting.

In addition to counseling and work relating to agency investigations, our experts advise clients on litigation in front of EU Courts, and also on private litigation in national courts, where an increasing amount of competition and regulatory disputes are being fCourts, and also on private litigation in national courts, where an increasing amount of competition and regulatory disputes are being fcourts, where an increasing amount of competition and regulatory disputes are being fought.

Marshall joins a deep bench of talent, including his colleague, former Court of Appeal justice Karen Sharlow, and our national tax and litigation partners who argue landmark cases that shape the law.»

What is a national court to do in follow - on litigation when, in Peter Smith J's words, EU procedures on which that litigation depends adopt a «one speed molasses approach»?

Livingston, NJ — May 2, 2017 — Veritext, the national leader in court reporting and litigation support solutions, today announces its expansion in the St. Louis, Missouri, market.

Livingston, NJ — January 16, 2018 — Veritext, the national leader in court reporting and litigation support solutions, today announces its acquisition of David Feldman Worldwide (DFW) Court Reporcourt reporting and litigation support solutions, today announces its acquisition of David Feldman Worldwide (DFW) Court ReporCourt Reporting.

Keesal, Young & Logan serves as counsel to many local, national and multinational concerns in a wide variety of complex business litigation matters pending in federal and state court as well as in arbitration.

Our attorneys regularly litigate complex unfair trade practices, antitrust, business torts and contract actions against major regional and national law firms and often serve as local counsel to out - of - state firms engaged in litigation in Connecticut state and federal courts.

Business Development: Brokering various business dealings that further the diversification of Indian economies Developing and accessing commercial financial programs and services for tribal governments, including tax - exempt offerings and federally - guaranteed housing loans Serving as issuer or underwriter's counsel in tribal bond issuances Ensuring tribal compliance with Bank Secrecy Act and other federal financial regulatory requirements Handling federal and state income, excise, B&O, property and other tax matters for tribes and tribal businesses Chartering tribal business enterprises under tribal, state and federal law Registering and protecting tribal trademarks and copyrights Negotiating franchise agreements for restaurants and retail stores on Indian reservations Custom - tailoring construction contracts for tribes and general contractors Helping secure federal SBA 8 (a) and other contracting preferences for Indian - owned businesses Facilitating contractual relations between tribes and tribal casinos, and gaming vendors Building tribal workers» compensation and self - insurance programs Government Relations: Handling state and federal regulatory matters in the areas of tribal gaming, environmental and cultural resources, workers» compensation, taxation, health care and education Negotiating tribal - state gaming compacts and fuel and cigarette compacts, and inter-local land use and law enforcement agreements Advocacy before the Washington State Gambling Commission, Washington Indian Gaming Association and National Indian Gaming Commission Preparing tribal codes and regulations, including tribal court, commercial, gaming, taxation, energy development, environmental and cultural resources protection, labor & employment, and workers» compensation laws Developing employee handbooks, manuals and personnel policies Advocacy in areas of treaty rights, gaming, jurisdiction, taxation, environmental and cultural resource protection Brokering fee - to - trust and related real estate and jurisdictional transactions Litigation & Appellate Services: Handling complex Indian law litigation, including commercial, labor & employment, tax, land use, treaty rights, natural and cultural resource matters Litigating tribal trust mismanagement claims against the United States, and evaluating tribal and individual property claims under the Indian Claims Limitation Act Defending tribes and tribal insureds from tort claims brought against them in tribal, state and federal courts, including defense tenders pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act Assisting tribal insureds in insurance coverage negotiations, and litigation Representing individual tribal members in tribal and state civil and criminal proceedings, including BIA prosecutions and Indian probate proceedings Assisting tribal governments with tribal, state and federal court appeals, including the preparation of amicus curiae briefs Our Indian law & gaming attorneys collaborate to publish the quarterly «Indian Legal Advisor ``, designed to provide Indian Country valuable information about legal and political developments affecting tribLitigation & Appellate Services: Handling complex Indian law litigation, including commercial, labor & employment, tax, land use, treaty rights, natural and cultural resource matters Litigating tribal trust mismanagement claims against the United States, and evaluating tribal and individual property claims under the Indian Claims Limitation Act Defending tribes and tribal insureds from tort claims brought against them in tribal, state and federal courts, including defense tenders pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act Assisting tribal insureds in insurance coverage negotiations, and litigation Representing individual tribal members in tribal and state civil and criminal proceedings, including BIA prosecutions and Indian probate proceedings Assisting tribal governments with tribal, state and federal court appeals, including the preparation of amicus curiae briefs Our Indian law & gaming attorneys collaborate to publish the quarterly «Indian Legal Advisor ``, designed to provide Indian Country valuable information about legal and political developments affecting triblitigation, including commercial, labor & employment, tax, land use, treaty rights, natural and cultural resource matters Litigating tribal trust mismanagement claims against the United States, and evaluating tribal and individual property claims under the Indian Claims Limitation Act Defending tribes and tribal insureds from tort claims brought against them in tribal, state and federal courts, including defense tenders pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act Assisting tribal insureds in insurance coverage negotiations, and litigation Representing individual tribal members in tribal and state civil and criminal proceedings, including BIA prosecutions and Indian probate proceedings Assisting tribal governments with tribal, state and federal court appeals, including the preparation of amicus curiae briefs Our Indian law & gaming attorneys collaborate to publish the quarterly «Indian Legal Advisor ``, designed to provide Indian Country valuable information about legal and political developments affecting triblitigation Representing individual tribal members in tribal and state civil and criminal proceedings, including BIA prosecutions and Indian probate proceedings Assisting tribal governments with tribal, state and federal court appeals, including the preparation of amicus curiae briefs Our Indian law & gaming attorneys collaborate to publish the quarterly «Indian Legal Advisor ``, designed to provide Indian Country valuable information about legal and political developments affecting tribal rights.

Magleby Cataxinos & Greenwood, is a Salt Lake City - based litigation firm representing local, national, and international clients in courts throughout the United States, including in Salt Lake County (Salt Lake City), Summit County (Park City), Wasatch County (Heber), Davis County (Bountiful), Weber County (Ogden), Utah County (Provo), Grand County (Moab), and Washington County (St. George).

They are often appointed to federal and state courts to serve as leaders in national litigation.

Rob Gain specializes in commercial litigation for Koskie Minsky LLP and says that having no co-ordinated approach to national class actions wastes the court's, claimants» and defendants» time.

Our business litigation attorneys have tried cases in state and federal courts throughout the country, and in national and international administrative tribunals and arbitration panels.

These rules are relevant in circumstances where a party is or may be investigated by the Commission, or indeed any national competition enforcement authority exercising powers on behalf of the Commission, and in subsequent litigation before the Court of Justice of the European Union.

From relatively simple state court proceedings to cases ranging from complex multidistrict litigation, The National Legal Research Group has assisted our attorney - clients with many discovery - related services such as: requests for production, deposition summaries, the preparation of interrogatories, motions to compel discovery, deposition preparation, and requests for admissions.

He was appointed by the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana to serve on the Plaintiffs Steering Committee in the national Vioxx Litigation, which resulted in a $ 4.7 billion national settlement.

He advises large national corporations on complex litigation in the areas of product liability defense, mass tort defense, class action and multidistrict litigation, as well as regional companies and locally owned concerns, in court cases in both state and federal systems.

Obtained preliminary injunction in federal court litigation involving misappropriation of trade secrets by national accounting firm and denial of requested injunction in related state court proceedings.

Our reputation as a national leaders in auto product liability litigation comes from three decades of taking on world's largest automakers and parts suppliers in courtrooms from coast to coast, including the U.S. Supreme Court.

Representation of leading national architectural design firm in copyright infringement litigation filed in Missouri federal court.

Lead counsel defending a national department store company in federal and state court litigation brought by garment workers from the Island of Saipan.

He has a broad knowledge of patent litigation and acts on behalf of national and international clients in the Netherlands courts (including the Supreme Court) and in the European Patent Office, particularly in Opposition Division and Technical Board of Appeal cases.

A trial lawyer at Robinson + Cole since 1980 with a focus on insurance coverage and class action litigation, Mr. Goldman has tried approximately 30 cases to conclusion in a wide range of jurisdictions throughout the United States, has handled numerous federal and state appeals in multiple jurisdictions, including the Supreme Court of the United States, and has served as lead counsel in many cases that have had high national visibility.

We represent our clients in all types of regional, national and cross-border insolvency matters, ranging in size and complexity from out of court loan workouts and financial restructurings to bankruptcy proceedings in multiple jurisdictions, creditors» rights litigation and distressed acquisitions.

The U.S. District Judge overseeing the multidistrict opioid litigation ordered all contingency fee attorneys to disclose to the court any third party litigation funding agreements, National Law Journal reports....

On October 9, 2009, the Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. («BNA») published an article entitled «Court Applies Tobacco II: Prop 64 Changed Standing Requirements, Not Substantive Law» in the Class Action Litigation Report.

With subject - matter expertise in various areas of the law, including intellectual property, pharmaceutical, environmental, construction, labor and employment, securities and commercial litigation, Planet Depos court reporters hold state and national licenses including CSR, RPR, RMR, RDR, CLR, CRR, RSA, and CMRS.

Prior to joining Beale and Company, Francesca worked in the commercial litigation team at a National firm where she dealt with all aspects of commercial litigation, with particular expertise in commercial contract disputes, director and shareholder disputes, restrictive covenants and High Court employment matters, urgent injunctive remedies and both Claimant and Defendant professional negligence claims.

Our multi-jurisdictional litigation practice finds us pursuing or defending a wide variety of parallel legal proceedings, including arbitrations, national court lawsuits and international court proceedings.

This includes representation of SEIU in litigation before courts and administrative agencies involving the National Labor Relations Act, the Fair Labor Standards Act, election campaign finance laws, and local and state labor relations statutes.

Prior to joining JMBM, Matthew worked for five years as an appellate attorney in the Environment & Natural Resources Division at the U.S. Department of Justice, where he represented federal agencies in the federal courts of appeals; for four years as an attorney at Paul Hastings, where he advised and represented corporate clients in environmental and real estate matters; for two years as a law clerk to the Honorable Consuelo M. Callahan on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit; and for two years as a supervising attorney and lecturer at the Stanford Law School Environmental Law Clinic, where he taught students the practice of law and represented grass - roots and national organizations in environmental litigation and policy matters.

However, the agency does not currently use information on patent litigation in initiating such actions; some PTO staff said that the types of patents involved in infringement litigation could be linked to PTO's internal data on the patent examination process, and a 2003 National Academies study showed that such analysis could be used to improve patent quality and examination by exposing patterns in the examination of patents that end up in court.

«Except for the solicitor general representing the United States, no single entity has more influence on what cases the Supreme Court decides and how it decides them than the National Chamber Litigation Center.»