Finding the right policy response to the oil shock is dominating
the national economic discussion.
Not exact matches
At a meeting of The Wall Street Journal's CEO Council, an interview with Cohn — the
National Economic Council director who previously worked as an executive at Goldman Sachs — prompted
discussion about the amount of investment the GOP tax bill, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, would generate.
The two were also agreed that larger
national discussions need to be held around climate change,
economic development and accommodation of aboriginal rights and title — and that LNG development should be seen as an opportunity to move on these issues.
And the brouhaha shifts the
national discussion to divisive social issues that could repel swing voters rather than
economic ones that could attract them in a climate of high unemployment and stumbling recovery, the GOP officials said.
If it turned out that in the twenty years after 1965 continuing growth of GNP had not been accompanied by improved
economic welfare, then surely it was time for a
national discussion of how welfare could be improved.
The foreign debt continues to be an issue and new voices have began to sound the need to look for ways to face it; (ii) At the
national level two questions are concentrating increasing attention: one is the reassessment of the necessary role of the state to correct the distortions of a runaway market (currently discussed in Europe and in the
discussions about the role the initiatives of «an active state has played in the
economic development of Asian countries); the other is the need for a «participative democracy over against a purely representative formal democracy: in this sense the need to strengthen civil society with its intermediate organizations becomes an important concern; (iii) the struggle for collective and personal identity in a society in which forced immigration, dehumanizing conditions in urban marginal situations, and foreign cultural aggression and massification in many forms produce a degrading type of poverty where communal, family and personal identity are eroded and even destroyed.
This enabled the Labour leader to move the
national economic debate from dry
discussions about deficits on to the impact of coalition policies on ordinary, hard - working families squeezed by rising prices.
Also at 6:30 p.m., the
National Action Network and Spectrum convene a special
discussion on technology for
economic mobility and social change featuring the Rev. Al Sharpton, state Sen. Brian Benjamin and business leaders,
National Action Network's House of Justice, 106 W. 145th St., Manhattan.
Dr. Christina Greer, professor of political science at Fordham University, will moderate the panel, with Linda Sarsour, Executive Director of the Arab American Association of New York; Luna Ranjit, Co-Founder and Executive Director of Adhikaar; Joanne N. Smith Founder and Executive Director of Girls for Gender Equality; and Margarita Rosa, Executive Director of
National Center for Law and
Economic Justice participating in the
discussion.
During
discussions earlier in the week at the Asia - Pacific
Economic Cooperation (APEC) meeting, China's
National Energy Administration said the country will try to keep its total coal use up to 4.2 billion tons by 2020.
Lawrence Livermore
National Laboratory physicist Tammy Ma participated in a panel
discussion — «Science With (out) Borders» — at the World
Economic Forum's annual summit.
Educating Students who Live in Poverty A
discussion with Ray Landers, principal at Boaz Middle School in Boaz, AL, and finalist for the 2009 MetLife / NASSP
National Principal of the Year award, about the reform efforts he has implemented at his school to reach students from low socio -
economic backgrounds.
Their timing is auspicious, given that President Obama has recently initiated a
national discussion about
economic inequality.
To foster
economic growth and job creation, state policymakers must encourage a culture of success within their boundaries, Nebraska Gov. Dave Heineman and Delaware Gov. Jack Markell said during a panel
discussion Thursday at the Kauffman Foundation's State of Entrepreneurship event at the
National Press Club.
This report draws from a scholarly
discussion paper The
National Institute for Early Education Research (NIEER) produced for the Organisation for
Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) that presented the pros and cons of various instruments used for reporting on international data of children's cognitive and social outcomes.
In my previous report I set out findings from a
national survey of traditional owners conducted by the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission: the National Survey on Land, Sea and Economic Development.18 A number of the findings are important in this discussion of the native title
national survey of traditional owners conducted by the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission: the
National Survey on Land, Sea and Economic Development.18 A number of the findings are important in this discussion of the native title
National Survey on Land, Sea and
Economic Development.18 A number of the findings are important in this
discussion of the native title system:
MEMBERSHIPS & HONORS Member, AICPA; CSCPA Member, Business Valuation Section;
Economic Damages Section; Family Law Section of the Litigation Services Section of the CSCPA Member, Institute of Business Appraisers;
National Association of Certified Valuation Analysts Member, Association of Certified Fraud Specialists Member, Beverly Hills Bar Association Alternative Dispute Resolution Section and Family Law Section
Discussion Groups Member, Los Angeles County Bar Association Dispute Resolution Services and Family Law Section
Discussion Groups Member, San Fernando Valley Bar Association Alternative Dispute Resolution Section and Family Law Section
Discussion Member, International Academy of Collaborative Professionals Treasurer and Director, Los Angeles Collaborative Family Law Association Past Treasurer and Director, Magen David Adom West, Inc..
Altman, J and Hunter, B, «Monitoring «practical» reconciliation: Evidence from the reconciliation decade, 1991 - 2001», Centre for Aboriginal
Economic Policy Research
Discussion Paper 254/2003, Australian
National University, Canberra 2003, www.anu.edu.au/caepr/
discussion2.php#254.
8 Gray A 1997, The Explosion of Aboriginality: Components of Indigenous Population Growth 1991 - 1996,
Discussion Paper no. 142/1997, Centre for Aboriginal
Economic Policy Research, Australian
National University, Canberra.