Sentences with phrase «national intelligence authorities»

On the American side, a new ombudsperson will be created to handle complaints on possible access by national intelligence authorities.

Under the proposed Privacy Shield, the U.S. will implement an ombudsperson mechanism through which the ombudsperson will handle complaints of EU individuals regarding unauthorized access of their personal information by national intelligence authorities.

Not exact matches

Science and Technology — Subject: Clinical trials Witness (es): Professor Karol Sikora, Medical Director of Cancer Partners UK and Dean, University of Buckingham Medical School and Simon Denegri, NIHR National Director for Public Participation and Engagement in Research and Chair, INVOLVE; Tracey Brown, Managing Director, Sense About Science and Dr Helen Jamison, Deputy Director, Science Media Centre; Sir Kent Woods, Chief Executive,, Dr Janet Wisely, Chief Executive, Health Research Authority, Bill Davidson, Acting Deputy Director and Head of Research Standards and Support, Department of Health and Peter Knight, Deputy Director, Head of Research Information and Intelligence, Department of Health Location: Room 8, Palace of Westminster

In keeping with this view of women's proper role — Sartre, with whom Bay has more in common than one might imagine, would have called it the etre - pour - autrui — the director also supplies us with a pretty Latina who is ushered briefly onscreen to be berated for her «hoochie» outfit, and a hard - nosed National Intelligence Director (Frances McDormand) whose authority is gradually usurped by a renegade male agent (John Turturro) to the point where she ends up, literally, across his lap.

Marc Barry, a national authority on intellectual property, is founder of C3I Analytics, a corporate - intelligence firm in New York City.

(7) records or information compiled for law enforcement purposes, but only to the extent that the production of such law enforcement records or information (A) could reasonably be expected to interfere with enforcement proceedings, (B) would deprive a person of a right to a fair trial or to an impartial adjudication, (C) could reasonably be expected to constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy, (D) could reasonably be expected to disclose the identity of a confidential source, including a State, local or foreign agency or authority or any private institution which furnished information on a confidential basis, and, in the case of a record or information compiled by criminal law enforcement authority in the course of a criminal investigation or by an agency conducting a lawful national security intelligence investigation, information furnished by a confidential source, (E) would disclose techniques and procedures for law enforcement investigations or prosecutions, or would disclose guidelines for law enforcement investigations or prosecutions if such disclosure could reasonably be expected to risk circumvention of the law, or (F) could reasonably be expected to endanger the life or physical safety of any individual; [the law enforcement exemption]

On top of this, FRONTEX elaborates and makes directly available to the national authorities two additional graphical interfaces (the «European Situational Picture» and the «Common Pre-Frontier Intelligence Picture») combining information and data received from the national authorities connected to the system.

This requires a State, at a minimum, to establish the following to a Competent Judicial Authority, prior to conducting Communications Surveillance for the purposes of enforcing law, protecting national security, or gathering intelligence:

Nevertheless, he took the opportunity to elaborate on the PMOI standard of review and raised the question as to whether intelligence analyses and sources should be subject to the EU courts at all and «whether, in a system based largely on the confidence which the EU institutions place in the evaluation conducted by the competent national authorities of the seriousness of the evidence or clues to support a freezing measure, an intensive review of that evidence by the EU judicature is in fact appropriate» (Opinion para. 66).

Politely put, the working party is not convinced that the representations of the U.S. Office of the Director of National Intelligence provide sufficient details to forestall / exclude against the massive and indiscriminate collection by U.S. authorities of personal data originating from the EU, basically through spying / surveillance activities (the Privacy Shield itself does contain certain national security exemNational Intelligence provide sufficient details to forestall / exclude against the massive and indiscriminate collection by U.S. authorities of personal data originating from the EU, basically through spying / surveillance activities (the Privacy Shield itself does contain certain national security exemnational security exemptions).

Furthermore, the rule does not confer new authority for intelligence, national security, or Presidential protective service activities.

The final rule, with modifications, allows a covered entity to disclose protected health information to an authorized federal official for the conduct of lawful intelligence, counter-intelligence, and other national security activities authorized by the National Security Act and implementing authority (e.g., Executive Ordenational security activities authorized by the National Security Act and implementing authority (e.g., Executive OrdeNational Security Act and implementing authority (e.g., Executive Order 1233).

Response: In the final rule, we clarify that this provision does not provide new authority for intelligence and national security officials to acquire health information that they otherwise would not be able to obtain.

A covered entity may disclose protected health information to authorized federal officials for the conduct of lawful intelligence, counter-intelligence, and other national security activities authorized by the National Security Act (50 U.S.C. 401, et seq.) and implementing authority (e.g., Executive Ordernational security activities authorized by the National Security Act (50 U.S.C. 401, et seq.) and implementing authority (e.g., Executive OrderNational Security Act (50 U.S.C. 401, et seq.) and implementing authority (e.g., Executive Order 12333).

Mr. Schrems lodged a complaint with the Irish data protection authority, taking the view that, in the light of the revelations made in 2013 by Edward Snowden concerning the activities of the United States intelligence services (in particular the National Security Agency), the law and practices of the US offer no real protection against surveillance by the US of the data transferred to that country.

Responsible for implementation of National, DoD, Director of Central Intelligence Directive (DCID), Joint Air Force Army Navy (JFAN, USAF and MAJCOM policies classifying and protecting special access program systems, national defense and other sensitive information originated or controlled by higher - level authorities and associated peNational, DoD, Director of Central Intelligence Directive (DCID), Joint Air Force Army Navy (JFAN, USAF and MAJCOM policies classifying and protecting special access program systems, national defense and other sensitive information originated or controlled by higher - level authorities and associated penational defense and other sensitive information originated or controlled by higher - level authorities and associated personnel.

If you have served as a military member, we may review requests from U.S. military command authorities, authorized officials for national security and intelligence, and to the Department of State for medical suitability determinations.