Sentences with phrase «national standards means»

Not exact matches

That means the American government building a nationwide 5G network within just three years — a timespan that includes the recreation of a «telecommunications manufacturing base in the U.S.» There would need to be new national standards for deploying the infrastructure, in order to speed up the process.

According to Goolam Ballim, group economist at Johannesburg - based Standard Bank, improvements in public finances over the past decade mean less revenues now go into debt servicing and capital repayment, opening the way for more national investment in infrastructure.

While that's more than a hundred times the standard savings rate at national banks, the online - only banks that offer such rates don't provide physical service locations, meaning that you won't be able to speak with a banker in person to manage your account.

Inasmuch as the New Revised Standard Version (NRSV) Bible sponsored by the National Council of Churches has been out since 1989, the TNIV is playing «catch up» on avoiding male terms when gender - inclusive words are valid translations or when humans in general were meant.

And their strategy, as an intellectual party, includes two lines of attack: to uproot the Shea / Guilday / McAvoy / Ellis standard account, and to replace it with a telling of the tale more congenial to their own current ecclesiastical concerns, which involve the catalogue of «progressive» causes flogged weekly in the National Catholic Reporter — disentangling the American church from «Rome» (meaning, from the program of Pope John Paul II and Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger), «women's rights» in the Church, the «democratization» of Catholicism, and so forth.

Certified organic beef must meet the USDA's 2002 national organic program standards, meaning cattle must be fed entirely with organic feed, must not be given growth hormones or antibiotics and must have access to pasture.

I would like to tell arsenal fan that the transfer window is not arsenal's problem.Let explain what is in my mind.We need to reinforce our team but we need to think in the future that most of the high class players are going to refuse signing for arsenal fc because of Mr Wenger's philosophy.It looks like arsenal becomes cemetery of players.How many players came in and left because of performance, became good players out of arsenal.We need to accept all of the transformation Mr wenger brings in arsenal but now it does not work.Why??? because lack of tactics, strategies and pretending best players for Mr wenger mind but in reality those players do not get standard of best player.Mr wenger wants to prove everybody that he is wright that players who are calling by wenger are best.I means Mr wenger is the only one can see all matter in good position or bad.He is wrong by thinking this way.He does not like criticism.he is the mind of arsenal.Everything he can say or defend is wright.Think about morrinho comments about arsenal!!!! Why he likes to be arsenal coach!!!! One thing I want to say about arsenal players, I think everybody watch arsenal games.We have got short mind players who play two good games and the rest shameless.They are working hard in the training ground for catching Mr wenger's mind to let them play; what is behind their (players) mind to be the most regular players.Those players have no vision even ambition; they are never becoming high class and their carriers are going to finish in arsenal after arsenal we are going to see them playing for championship.They do not care to become legend as Ian wright, Vierra, Berckam, piress, Henry... What is the big behind their mind to use wenger name to be selected in national team.They are not able to face different leagues in the world.

This is obviously a ground meant for a lower league than the Conference National, with the tell - tale temporary seating blocks on each side towards the away end that have been used to bring it up to conference standards.

«We can't guess what going to happen... (State block grant funding) probably would mean the elimination of national nutrition standards.»

Whilst this might constitute a relatively high level of participation by recent standards, it does still mean that 28 % of registered voters did not bother to have their say in what, we were frequently told, was the most important national decision in our lifetimes.

As the country's official member body, ANSI ensures that U.S. interested parties have access to the standards - development processes of the International Organization for Standardization and, by means of the U.S. National Committee, to the International Electrotechnical Commission.

This means we meet the highest national standards for cancer care and research and receives support for our scientific endeavors.

«Certified Organic» Means Quality You Can Trust Gold Mine Natural Food Company is independently 3rd party certified as an Organic Producer by Organic Certifiers and meets or exceeds the standards of the US Department of Agriculture National Organic Program (USDA NOP).

Highlights of this year's NAPLAN results include: • There is evidence of movement of students from lower to higher bands of achievement across year levels and most domains over the last 10 years • Year 3 reading results continue to show sustained improvement • ACT, Victoria and NSW continue to have high mean achievement across all domains • There are increases in mean achievement in the Northern Territory in primary years reading and numeracy since 2008 • WA and Queensland have the largest growth in mean achievement across most domains since 2008 • Percentage of students meeting the national minimum standard remains high — over 90 per cent nationally and in most states and territories, across all domains and year levels

Arguing that academic standards for students will mean little unless educators are adequately prepared, the National Staff Development Council last week released a set of standards for effective professional development.

In response to the article on the disparity in state proficiency standards that Peter Kaplan and I published earlier this week, one reader, Scott McLeod, referred (in a comment) to an article arguing that that «proficiency» as defined by the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) does not really mean proficiency.

Much as a Republican might make national standards more palatable to his base by linking them to school choice, a Democrat will want to link national standards to a greater commitment to funding the means to achieve them.

The second is that the Common Core movement muddles through, meaning that we end up, eventually, with a nearly national set of standards for what students need to know and do at each grade, high quality assessments aligned to those standards, cut scores for proficiency on those assessments that are challenging and equal across the nation, and a set of meaningful carrots and sticks for holding educators accountable for preparing all their students for success.

Just because the public favors reauthorization of NCLB does not mean that it opposes efforts to amend the act by establishing a single national standard.

«Currently there is no national standard for what it means to be a teacher of record.»

Never mind that dictating the ends with a national set of standards, curriculum, and assessments will necessarily dictate much of the means.

«We are aware that the Common Core Standards developed by the National Governors Association in conjunction with the Chief State School Officers are meant to be just that: standards.

Notable from national data 53 % of pupils achieved Combined RWM That does not mean that 53 % of schools meet the attainment floor standard!

If «there is no correlation between the quality of state standards... and scores on the National Assessment of Educational Progress,» why does that mean that «standards are irrelevant to schooling»?

Ritz is one of fewer than 200 National Board certified teachers in Indiana, which means her teaching was recognized through a rigorous review process of meeting high standards.

Comparing Hawaii's Proficiency Standards to the National «Gold Standard» (NAEP) Each state defines for itself what «proficient» means; some states have a rigorous definition, while others are less strict in their standards.

The great diversity of organizations at the national level may mean a cacophony of different messages about how to enact the standards in classroom instruction; then again, the relatively low number of organizations gaining traction with multiple states means that instructional messages may be more coherent, assuming that the resources from each organization are providing similar messages about instruction.

It's also possible that the amendment meant to refer to assessment standards jointly developed by the American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, and National Council on Measurement in Education.

No doubt, it was flattering to be part of the «Race to the Top» (though «common standards» didn't necessarily mean Common Core), but it also meant stepping out of the warm embrace of state education committees to the hyper partisan atmosphere of national politics.

And they're asking for one national standard, meaning they don't want California to go off and set its own rules.

The term child restraint means any device (including child safety seat, booster seat, harness, and excepting seat belts) designed for use in a motor vehicle to restrain, seat, or position children who weigh 65 pounds (30 kilograms) or less, and certified to the Federal motor vehicle safety standard prescribed by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration for child restraints.

While that's more than a hundred times the standard savings rate at national banks, the online - only banks that offer such rates don't provide physical service locations, meaning that you won't be able to speak with a banker in person to manage your account.

It means the food product has been made in accordance with the standards set by the National Organic Standards Board.

While commercial dog foods must be nutritionally balanced to meet national standards, balanced doesn't mean all natural.

This means we've voluntarily met rigorous national standards for top - quality specialty care — and you can trust NGVS to provide the best possible care for your pet, day or night.

No national parent club means there aren't experienced members (breeders) to create a breed standard (which ensures Rottweilers look like Rottweilers) or identify or require health testing — yikes!

Look for operators that are members of the United States Tour Operators Association, the American Society of Travel Agents, or the National Tour Association, which means is they're required to carry a certain amount of insurance and adhere to specific standards.

Phillips also affirms that our jury system is a means to an important end: «By keeping the standard high, the Torpedo Factory is a destination for art tourists who visit the Washington area each year — and an art center with a national reputation that the city of Alexandria can be proud of.»

I mean, a clean - energy portfolio standard, properly done is, a national energy policy for the United States.

Investigate How big is a raindrop collect data and analyse mode, mean and median, range, interquartile range and standard deviation etc. - with thanks to Stephen Lyon at the National STEM centre.

Pace the phrase «any air pollutant,» everything in § 115 points to it being meant to apply only to NAAQS pollutants, i.e., those for which EPA has established a «National Ambient Air Quality Standard»: a numerical value representing the appropriate atmospheric concentration of ozone, particulate matter, etc..

The distinction between attainment and non-attainment areas presupposes, and has no meaning apart from, the adoption of national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) for the pollutant of concern.

This also means that Midwestern state governors and their respective US Congressional delegations need to take seriously the recent changes to national ambient air quality standards and pollution control standards for refineries.

Sedona Canada does not analyze: (1) the meaning and consequences of the «system integrity concept» in the e-records provisions of the Evidence Acts — proof of «records integrity» requires proof of «records system integrity»; (2) the National Standard of Canada for e-records management, Electronic Records as Documentary Evidence CAN / CGSB -72.34-2005 («72.34»); and, (3) the need of the parties to exchange verifications of compliance, provided by records management experts, of their electronic records management systems (ERMS's) with the national sNational Standard of Canada for e-records management, Electronic Records as Documentary Evidence CAN / CGSB -72.34-2005 («72.34»); and, (3) the need of the parties to exchange verifications of compliance, provided by records management experts, of their electronic records management systems (ERMS's) with the national sStandard of Canada for e-records management, Electronic Records as Documentary Evidence CAN / CGSB -72.34-2005 («72.34»); and, (3) the need of the parties to exchange verifications of compliance, provided by records management experts, of their electronic records management systems (ERMS's) with the national snational standardstandard.

But the phrase in the electronic records provisions of the Evidence Acts, «the integrity of the electronic records [or documents] system,» requires an authoritative national standard to give it a sufficiently precise meaning to be workable — e.g. s. 31.2 (1)(a) of the Canada Evidence Act, and the reference to the use of standards in s. 31.5.

With an expanding scope of EU law, this means that there will be less and less leeway for Member States to apply their own rights standards, and further reduces their national autonomy in an area that concerns fundamental national values.

Instead, a wide variety of admissibility standards exist under national laws, meaning that some Member States have insufficient mechanisms to prevent meritless actions from being filed and pursued.

Article 10 (1)(d) of Council Directive 2004 / 83 / EC of 29 April 2004 on minimum standards for the qualification and status of third - country nationals or Stateless persons as refugees or as persons who otherwise need international protection and the content of the protection granted must be interpreted as meaning that the existence of criminal laws, such as those at issue in each of the cases in the main proceedings, which specifically target homosexuals, supports the finding that those persons must be regarded as forming a particular social group.

Does this mean that EU Member States can never set higher national standards of fundamental rights in all situations governed by EU law (cf. CJEU, Åkerberg Fransson)?

Re: lawyers practising in association with non-lawyers: - Absolutely necessary because: (1) technology will be the basis of almost all laws, therefore we will have to practice with other experts in that technology; (2) records management law will be a major area of practice because, records are the most frequently used form of evidence and e-records depend for everything on their e-records management systems (ERMSs), and they must be compliant with the National Standards of Canada for e-records management, which standards require legal opinions, and every significant change to an ERMS requires a legal opinion re ability to produce records able to satisfy laws as to e-discovery, admissibility of evidence, privacy & access to information, electronic commerce, tax laws, and compliance with National Standards of Canada for e-records management; (3) all new technologies require a legal framework, which means more work for lawyers; and, (4) otherwise, other professions and service providers who now provide «legal information,» will begin to provide «legal advice» and other services that only lawyers should be providing.