Their major problems, such as the current, extremely misery - causing
national unaffordable legal services problem, require expertise that lawyers themselves do not have.
Closely related would be a
national institute for advising law societies how to deal with major problems such as the
unaffordable legal services problem which afflicts the majority of the population.
And therefore, the solution to the currently massively damaging «access to justice» problem of
unaffordable legal services, is to make CanLII as good a national support - service as LAO LAW is for Ontario's legal aid lawyers — see: (1) my Slaw blog of Oct. 24th; (2) my Comment to Monica Goyal's Slaw post of Nov. 25th: «Access to Justice: Courts and Technology: A Twitterchat»; and, (3) my Comment to Monica Goyal's Slaw post of Nov. 4th: «Innovation and the Legal Profession: A Twitter Chat.&r
legal services, is to make CanLII as good a
national support -
service as LAO LAW is for Ontario's
legal aid lawyers — see: (1) my Slaw blog of Oct. 24th; (2) my Comment to Monica Goyal's Slaw post of Nov. 25th: «Access to Justice: Courts and Technology: A Twitterchat»; and, (3) my Comment to Monica Goyal's Slaw post of Nov. 4th: «Innovation and the Legal Profession: A Twitter Chat.&r
legal aid lawyers — see: (1) my Slaw blog of Oct. 24th; (2) my Comment to Monica Goyal's Slaw post of Nov. 25th: «Access to Justice: Courts and Technology: A Twitterchat»; and, (3) my Comment to Monica Goyal's Slaw post of Nov. 4th: «Innovation and the
Legal Profession: A Twitter Chat.&r
Legal Profession: A Twitter Chat.»
I have previously advocated that Canada's law societies are badly in need of a civil
service - type
national institution to advise them; see: «A2J: Preventing the Abolition of Law Societies by Curing the Defects in their Management Structure: A Solution to the
Unaffordable Legal Services Problem.»