Sentences with phrase «nationals residing in the country»

In the 1986, badly reduced in size and influence, the UFW endorsed President Ronald Reagan's plan to grant amnesty to some four million foreign nationals residing in the country without proper paperwork.

Primary enrollees do not include individuals who are not U.S. nationals residing in the country of their citizenship;

Not exact matches

There are at least two copies of the quran still in existance from the time of the first caliphate, and they are protected as national treasures by the governments of the countries in which they reside.

Both Republicans have stressed they favor a pathway to citizenship for those undocumented individuals who have resided in the country for a long period and have committed no other crime, and framed their legal case around the issue of national security.

Yakubu said, «Given the high stakes of conducting elections in developing countries, electoral commissions must understandably be worried about the twin issues of communication and security especially in situations where data reside with and is directly transmitted to the tallying centres through offshore vendors rather than exclusively controlled within national boundaries by election monitoring bodies.

In addition, several national partners will also provide support to the best applications from a student residing in their respective countrieIn addition, several national partners will also provide support to the best applications from a student residing in their respective countriein their respective countries.

«to take the opportunity afforded by these two references to give clear and structured guidance as to the circumstances in which the third country national family member of an EU citizen who is residing in his home Member State but who is exercising his rights of free movement can claim a derived right of residence in the home Member State under EU law.»

90 The meaning and scope of the concept of «core benefits» in Article 11 (4) of Directive 2003/109 must therefore be sought taking into account the context of that article and the objective pursued by that directive, namely the integration of third - country nationals who have resided legally and continuously in the Member States.

The Court therefore ruled that in case the position of beneficiaries from subsidiary protection can be regarded as being different from third country nationals legally resident in Germany on grounds that are not humanitarian or political or based on international law and who are in receipt of welfare benefits, as these third country nationals could presumably only reside in Germany in case they were able to financially support themselves and may therefore be assumed to be integrated by the time they would be eligible for social security benefits, the residence condition does not infringe on Article 33 of the Qualification Directive.

She has a right to reside in the UK as the Zambrano carer of her children — i.e. as the third country national carer of her EU citizen children, her presence being required for her EU citizen children to enjoy the rights of EU citizenship.

-- conditions of employment for third - country nationals legally residing in Community territory;

Case C - 218 / 14 Singh v Minister of Justice and Equality [2016] QB 208: preliminary reference concerning the rights of third country nationals to reside in the EU.

Case C - 115 / 15 Secretary of State for the Home Department v NA (judgment of 30 June 2016): represented the UK in a reference to the EU Court of Justice concerning the rights of third country national divorcees to reside in the EU.

52 However, the mere fact that it might appear desirable, for economic reasons or in order to preserve the family unit in the territory of the Union, for members of a family consisting of third country nationals and a Union citizen who is a minor to be able to reside with that citizen in the territory of the Union in the Member State of which he is a national is not sufficient in itself to support the view that the Union citizen would be forced to leave the territory of the Union if such a right of residence were not granted (see, to that effect, Dereci and Others, paragraph 68).

(d) «family reunification» means the entry into and residence in a Member State by family members of a third country national residing lawfully in that Member State in order to preserve the family unit, whether the family relationship arose before or after the resident's entry.»

35 By its questions, which should be examined together, the referring court essentially asks whether the provisions of European Union law on citizenship of the Union must be interpreted as precluding a Member State from refusing to grant a third country national a residence permit on the basis of family reunification where that national seeks to reside with his spouse, who is also a third country national and resides lawfully in that Member State and is the mother of a child from a previous marriage who is a Union citizen, and with the child of their own marriage, who is also a third country national.

4 In accordance with Article 1 of that directive, its purpose is «to determine the conditions for the exercise of the right to family reunification by third country nationals residing lawfully in the territory of the Member States»In accordance with Article 1 of that directive, its purpose is «to determine the conditions for the exercise of the right to family reunification by third country nationals residing lawfully in the territory of the Member States»in the territory of the Member States».

67 In paragraph 48 of the judgment in Dereci and Others, the Court took the view that, in so far as the disputes in the main proceedings concerned Union citizens who resided in a Member State and their family members who were third country nationals who wished to enter and reside in that Member State for the purposes of living as a family with those citizens, Directive 2003/86 was not applicable to those third country nationalIn paragraph 48 of the judgment in Dereci and Others, the Court took the view that, in so far as the disputes in the main proceedings concerned Union citizens who resided in a Member State and their family members who were third country nationals who wished to enter and reside in that Member State for the purposes of living as a family with those citizens, Directive 2003/86 was not applicable to those third country nationalin Dereci and Others, the Court took the view that, in so far as the disputes in the main proceedings concerned Union citizens who resided in a Member State and their family members who were third country nationals who wished to enter and reside in that Member State for the purposes of living as a family with those citizens, Directive 2003/86 was not applicable to those third country nationalin so far as the disputes in the main proceedings concerned Union citizens who resided in a Member State and their family members who were third country nationals who wished to enter and reside in that Member State for the purposes of living as a family with those citizens, Directive 2003/86 was not applicable to those third country nationalin the main proceedings concerned Union citizens who resided in a Member State and their family members who were third country nationals who wished to enter and reside in that Member State for the purposes of living as a family with those citizens, Directive 2003/86 was not applicable to those third country nationalin a Member State and their family members who were third country nationals who wished to enter and reside in that Member State for the purposes of living as a family with those citizens, Directive 2003/86 was not applicable to those third country nationalin that Member State for the purposes of living as a family with those citizens, Directive 2003/86 was not applicable to those third country nationals.

(c) «sponsor» means a third country national residing lawfully in a Member State and applying or whose family members apply for family reunification to be joined with him / her;

-- Article 20 TFEU must be interpreted as not precluding a Member State from refusing to grant a third country national a residence permit on the basis of family reunification where that national seeks to reside with his spouse, who is also a third country national and resides lawfully in that Member State and is the mother of a child from a previous marriage who is a Union citizen, and with the child of their own marriage, who is also a third country national, provided that such a refusal does not entail, for the Union citizen concerned, the denial of the genuine enjoyment of the substance of the rights conferred by the status of citizen of the Union, that being for the referring court to ascertain.

She discerned that another error in transposition — warranting that they both live or have lived in the same country outside the UK — had been corrected in November 2012 when the words «in which the EEA national also resides» were deleted from reg 8 (2)(a).