Sentences with phrase «nations meet emissions targets»

Renewable resources, such as these wind and solar arrays near Palm Springs, Calif., can help nations meet emissions targets.

Not exact matches

The scheme is vital: The only way nations can meet the targets in the Paris Agreement to combat climate change is to eliminate the burning of fossil fuels or to capture emissions and find a place to store them besides the atmosphere.

The work found that the most cost effective strategy for the tourism industry to meet the United Nations» recommended targets of reducing carbon emissions, includes a combination of strategic energy saving and renewable energy initiatives within the industry and buying carbon offsets from other parts of the global economy where emission reductions can be done at less cost.

The new study, led by Professor Scott, found that the most cost effective strategy for the tourism industry to meet the United Nations» recommended targets of reducing carbon emissions, includes a combination of strategic energy saving and renewable energy initiatives within the industry and buying carbon offsets from other parts of the global economy where emission reductions can be done at less cost.

The Obama administration is quietly working on new greenhouse gas emissions targets to deliver to the United Nations, even as it struggles to craft regulations that will enable the United States to meet its current carbon - cutting goals.

To comply, the 182 nations that signed the protocol must meet targets for reducing emissions of greenhouse gases — climate - warming gases that include the common industrial by - products carbon dioxide and methane.

Doing away with the CDM and other offsets could be hard, though, because they are the easiest way for industrial nations to meet their emissions targets.

The CDM - the U.N.'s main carbon market set up by the Kyoto Protocol - has helped to channel almost $ 400 billion to carbon - cutting projects in the developing world by allowing investors to earn credits they can sell for use in meeting emission targets in richer nations.

This includes clauses to: limit global warming to less than 2 °C above pre-industrial levels and endeavour to limit it to 1.5 °C; for countries to meet their own voluntary targets on limiting emissions between 2020 and 2030; for countries to submit new, tougher, targets every five years; to aim for zero net emissions by 2050 - 2100; and for rich nations to help poorer ones adapt.

The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) includes a constellation of issues unfolding under the general umbrella of climate meetings; these issues range from low - carbon technology transfer agreements to finance to emissions reductions targets.

In fact, the host nation is up on almost all emissions it was supposed to cut back on and had to buy credits from other countries so that it met it's target level.

That means wind, solar, and other renewable energy sources are well positioned to help states meet their emission reduction targets and accelerate our nation's transition to a clean, low - carbon economy.

They were put there because they are the only thing that would give Australia a chance of meeting the deeper emissions reduction targets it will almost certainly have to agree to at a United Nations meeting in Paris this December.

Cracking the Code: A Much - Awaited Approach for Dramatically Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions In a major announcement today, Edward Mazria and Architecture 2030 have released an unprecedented and much - anticipated guide for every city, county and state in the nation to swiftly meet the greenhouse gas reduction targets of the 2030 Challenge.

However, not even 12 months after the much - hyped meeting in the Danish capital, such an ambition has already been placed under intense scrutiny with a range of studies serving to suggest that the emission targets in place within individual nations makes an increase of 4C far more likely in the long - term.

According to UN Environment, existing commitments by nations fall well short of what is needed to meet warming targets and emissions will not fall quickly until the world undertakes much more ambitious mitigation actions.

Instead of raising emission targets to meet the official UN 2 degree climate target (that IPCC AR4 connects to the 450ppm stabilization level — industrialized nations need to reduce their emissions by 25 - 40 % between 1990 en 2020) some Annex1 countries actually lowered their (intended) reduction targets for the crucial year of 2020.

At the same time, «much greater emissions reductions efforts... will be required» to meet the target endorsed by the UN 195 - nation climate body, it said.

«The world simply can not meet its climate targets unless high meat - consuming nations like the U.S. substantially cut emissions associated with meat - and dairy - intensive diets,» said

That agreement will require carbon emission reductions for all nations by 2015 to meet the two - degree target.

The Climate Change Authority, the independent statutory body to advise on emissions targets and policies, factored three aspects into its recommendation today: Australia's relative capacity to afford action to reduce emissions, the nation's responsibility to do so, and the effort required to meet the target.

«One expert group ran a worst - case computer simulation of what would happen if the U.S. does not curb emissions, but other nations do meet their targets.

The US March announcement on its reduction targets for 2025 was met with mostly, but not uniformly, positive responses from nations around the world because the new commitments were a significant increase over the US commitment made in 2009 to reduce US ghg emissions by 17 % below 2005 emissions levels by 2020.

If the much ballyhooed agreement gets up that is in the works and it seems to be the only way now that the Paris gigolos will get their custom, it allows everybody to set their own amount of emissions, their own time to meet that target, their own time when they will begin to reduce emissions and their own way of meeting their own target etc, India, China, probably Russia as its all a western plot to ring fence Russia, possibly SE Asian nations like Indonesia and maybe like Kyoto even the Americans won't sign if Congress and the Senate aren't happy, unless all of them can get that freedom to act as they wish and when they wish and how they wish and ultimately IF they wish.

In September, China and the United States announced they had formulated a «common vision» to secure an ambitious global climate agreement at the highly anticipated United Nations» climate meeting in Paris later this year; and that the world's two largest greenhouse gas emitting nations will stand together at the Paris meeting to push for emissions targets that «ramp up over time in the direction of greater ambition.Nations» climate meeting in Paris later this year; and that the world's two largest greenhouse gas emitting nations will stand together at the Paris meeting to push for emissions targets that «ramp up over time in the direction of greater ambition.nations will stand together at the Paris meeting to push for emissions targets that «ramp up over time in the direction of greater ambition.»

Australia is expected to come under growing pressure in the coming year to raise its emissions reduction target from its current level of 5 per cent, as negotiations accelerate to try to achieve a global treaty on climate change that binds all nations by 2015, and meets the science.

After the Paris Agreement, a major challenge will be achieving emissions reductions while promoting sustainable development and allowing nations flexibility to meet targets.

In fact, despite the almost universal acceptance by nations of the 2 °C warming limit, the actual ghg emission targets and timetables chosen by almost all nations do not meet the levels of emissions reductions specified by IPCC as necessary to keep atmospheric concentrations below 450 ppm and thereby achieve the 2 °C warming limit.

Although groups and individuals have respectable ethical arguments to make that they are complying with their ethical duties if they are meeting nationally imposed obligations, ethical arguments remain that they should do more if: (a) the national target does not move as quickly as possible to reduce the nation's emissions to its fair share of safe global emissions, or (b) the group or individual could do more to reduce GHG emissions without imposing great hardship on themselves because they are wasting GHG emitting energy on unnecessary activities.

The European participants at this meeting must clearly commit to binding targets for industrialised countries to cut their emissions, and to keeping the process within the framework of the United Nations climate negotiations,» added Ms Meister.

The United Nations climate negotiations in Paris this December will influence the shape and scale of these types of results - based payments in the coming years and thus the ability of at least 57 developing countries to meet conditional emissions reductions targets that depend on international finance.

In December 1997 representatives of the world's nations met in Kyoto, Japan, to establish, for the first time, specific legally binding targets and timetables for the emission of heat - trapping gases (Focus GW.1).

More On The Kyoto Protocol 16 Kyoto Protocol Nations On Track to Meet Emissions Reductions Target, Through No Fault of Their Own Kyoto Protocol Lawsuit Dismissed: Canada Gets to Keep Dragging Feet on Climate Change Action Austria Not Pulling its Weight in Meeting Kyoto Objectives Russia Joins Global League of Climate Obstructionists, Putting Future U.N. Treaty in Doubt Iraq Again Focuses Attention on U.S., This Time By Ratifying Kyoto Japan Taking the Easy Way Out to Meet Kyoto Obligations Influencing The Post-Kyoto Framework China Open To Post-Kyoto Framework Canada Sort of Commits to Kyoto.

The answer is this: As other nations craft climate action plans and strategies, as they look to technologies and innovations to meet global emissions targets, the United States is showing the way — largely because of clean - burning natural gas produced by America's game - changing energy revolution.

They will help the nation meet targeted emissions reduction at the lowest possible cost.