He doesn't look 100 percent
natural as a right winger or attacking midfielder, and it's been quite a while since he's lined up as a center forward or striker.
Not exact matches
Our 3 back is just so wrong.We don't have
natural wingbacks even in this formation.It also seems to me that lots of people here believe if you're good at
right or left fullback then automatically you're good at RWB / LWB which quite frankly is untrue.That's why Oxlade Chamberlain can be considered at RWB but not
right back.At RWB or LWB you're asking too much in terms of attack from Bellerin and Kolasinac.A proper wing back can be viewed
as a more defensive
winger which quite frankly none of them are and they don't possess the flexibility too to play that way.Our midfielders are also not disciplined enough because in 3 back there's a huge gap in the centre of the field that must be covered by our CM's so indiscipline only means disaster.We also have Ozil who looks like he's playing at RW in 3 back.In that we're limiting his impact because Ozil takes on his man because he wants to not because he likes to.You can't play such players at the wing.He's a proper No. 10 who likes to be given freedom.That's why Ozil plays likes he's lazy on the ball and stuff.It's because he wants to be free and for that you need to put him at No. 10.
His movements are already very good when he played in the
right wing side (
as a
winger, not a wingback), because he is a
natural right footer
Moreso
as Arsenal are not currently in dear need of a striker, but are truly in need of 2 additions of top quality
natural right winger & left back.
Walcott was supposed to penetrate and create havoc in the opponent's defense area, because he played
as a
right winger and he is a
natural right footer!
-- Nelson: He is also a
natural right footer and was expected to cut inside
as an inverted
winger in the left side.
Can some one tell, what hes
natural position Hes playing
as left
winger,
right winger, some say hes oziel replacement.