1) This kind of study continues to reinforce the notion that
natural cyclical changes in ocean to atmosphere energy transfers are a very signficant potential reason for both the pause (as the ocean has retained more energy) and part of the big warming during the 1976 - 1998 period.
Not exact matches
Whilst this is the basic cause of the
cyclical nature of the ice age and the warmer inter ice age climate of the earth in the last few million years at least, there are
natural «feedbacks» in the earth which then exaggerate this climatic
change.
That's why deniers will continue to insist that observed climate
changes are «
natural» and «
cyclical,» and why young Earth creationists Tony Perkins and Ken Ham attribute them to an act of God.
The advantage of recognising a reversed sign for the solar effect high up in the atmosphere is that it enables a scenario whereby the bottom up effects of ocean cycles and the top down effects of solar variability can be seen to be engaged in a complex ever
changing dance with the primary climate response being
changes in the tropospheric air circulation systems to give us the observed
natural climate variability via
cyclical latitudinal shifts in all the air circulation systems and notably the jet streams.
I'm not saying that human activities do not have an impact on climate, I am just saying that we have greatly overlooked the
natural cyclical nature of our solar system, as well as other factors that effect climate
change.
Climate
change is the
change in weather pattern due to
natural, periodic and
cyclical swings in temperatures such as the ice age which covers a much longer period of time usually for thousands of years.
Maybe these ivory tower, incredible lame - brains might try explaining to the science teachers, or even the prestigious «science» journals, how it is possible to stop the continuous
natural climate
change or those pesky major
cyclical climate patterns.
There is a plethora of empirical and anecdotal data indicating that
changes in Arctic ice extent result from
natural and
cyclical variability.
Although it is clear that further attention is required in defining and characterizing the aspects of this variation (e.g. frequency and amplitude [44,65]-RRB- that lead to differences in species responses, a more immediate empirical challenge is to characterize and separate the effects of periodic, stochastic and / or
cyclical natural variations [61] from directional
change imposed by long - term climatic forcing.
As Sarah Palin said, «while we recognize the occurrence of these
natural,
cyclical environmental trends, we can't say with assurance that man's activities cause weather
change».