Sentences with phrase «natural decrease because»

Not exact matches

We should point out here that because of the high prebiotic fiber content in chicory root (the all - natural sweetener used in ChocoPerfection chocolate), eating ChocoPerfection will actually stimulate the growth of beneficial bacteria in the colon and decrease your hunger levels while also satisfying your sweet tooth.

What I am hoping to gain from this year (or as long as I can hold out) is new recipes to feed my growing family, and finding a natural way to reduce food waste and decrease our food budget... because this family loves them some expensive food items like organic bananas (guilty) and fancy cheese boards.

Using large amounts of the following herbs and other natural remedies should be avoided while nursing because they have been known to decrease milk supply.

As people age, their creatinine level usually decreases because of the natural loss of muscle mass and lack of physical activity that could maintain it.

It's a hard fact to face, but a huge part of the reason so many of us are not getting enough sleep is because our eyes are glued to blue wavelength screens for hours before bedtime, which according to research, decreases our body's natural melatonin secretion and sabotages our sleep.

This is important because as men age their natural testosterone levels decrease over time.

No, usually pregnancy decreases Adrenal Fatigue because the fetus produces a greater amount of natural adrenal hormones than the amount in the non-pregnant female.

It is so typical for stress to cause a flare up of an auto - immune condition, because stress causes the depletion of the adrenal hormone called cortisol, and cortisol is the hormone responsible for decreasing the body's natural inflammatory response to a large degree.

You'll find it in all sorts of anti-aging skincare products because our bodies» natural collagen production decreases as we get older.

Investments in bonds issued by non-U.S. companies are subject to risks including country / regional risk, which is the chance that political upheaval, financial troubles, or natural disasters will adversely affect the value of securities issued by companies in foreign countries or regions; and currency risk, which is the chance that the value of a foreign investment, measured in U.S. dollars, will decrease because of unfavorable changes in currency exchange rates.

Investments in stocks and bonds issued by non-U.S. companies are subject to risks including country / regional risk, which is the chance that political upheaval, financial troubles, or natural disasters will adversely affect the value of securities issued by companies in foreign countries or regions; and currency risk, which is the chance that the value of a foreign investment, measured in U.S. dollars, will decrease because of unfavorable changes in currency exchange rates.

Property values could decrease because of overbuilding, environmental liabilities, uninsured damages caused by natural disasters, a general decline in the neighborhood, losses due to casualty or condemnation, increases in property taxes, or changes in zoning laws.

I should have been more accurate — the presentation says «reversibility suggests natural variations» and I presume this is because over the period 1984 - 2003 the albedo is seen to both decrease and increase and there is an assumption that an anthropogenic variation would be one - way.

Though scientists warn that global warming will likely continue for centuries because of the long natural processes involved, there are a few things we can do to decrease the effects.

At a time at which U.S. dependence on coal is decreasing (due to increased supplies of unconventional natural gas and hence lower gas prices), China continues to rely on coal, but is very concerned about this, partly because of localized health impacts of particulates and other pollutants.

Coal - fired generation has decreased because of both the economics driven by cost per kilowatthour compared to that of natural gas and because of the effects of increased regulation on air emissions.

The historical macro data show the natural tendency of economies towards decreasing energy / GDP and energy / population which is the result of several things notably: 1) these ratios trend downward (unless of course economies are truly» failed»)-- meaning economies naturally move to higher value - added composition e.g., technology, retail, services,... 2) developed economies have higher supply and consumption efficiencies simply because the technological bases are more advance and efficient be it automotive, industrial, home, personal,... etc..

Smaller relative decreases are expected for CH3Br in response to restrictions because it has substantial natural sources.

As written above, it is natural that lands warm (cool) faster than seas: but, I think, it would be much better for studying GW (there are many other issues for lands even without GW) to point on waters rather than on inhabited lands (with a simple condition: all waters; not saying that Arctic pack is decreasing, making silence on Antarctic pack because it instead doesn't fit AGW theories).

The EIA says this is «because of the decreased use of coal and the increased use of natural gas for electricity generation.»

While US emissions are decreasing slightly — both as a result of the administration's policies on renewable energy and vehicle fuel economy standards and because of sharply lower natural gas prices that have reduced coal use for electricity generation — it is unlikely that without additional regulation or legislation that the US will meet its 2020 target.

But in the US this decrease occurred not through government intervention but through market - based substitution of natural gas - fired plants for coal plants because of increased use of fracking and other new techniques in finding additional natural gas.

We assumed only that due to the biological and physical effects the ratio fabsorbed (t) / (total CO2 content of then air) is more or less constant, hence a simple response pulse response exp -LRB-- t / lifetime) is applied to the anthropic time series of coal, gas, oil and cement which have different delta13C As the isotopic signature of (CO2 natural)(t) is slowly decreasing because plants living days or centuries ago are now rotting and degassing and as molecules entered in the ocean decades ago are now in the upwellings after a slow migration along the equal density surface from the high latitudes where those surface are surfacing at depth zero, there are common sense constraints or bounds on the possible evolution of the delta13C of the natural out - gassed CO2 molecules.

One can make this quite a bit more complicated, because as you correctly note the magnitude of the gross fluxes (e.g., natural sinks) isn't independent of the atmospheric concentration, so one can't just say that if we removed all human emissions the net natural flux would still be negative and atmospheric CO2 would be decreasing.

fracking is good because it allows us to produce natural gas cheaper than coal, and that allows a rapid decrease in greenhouse gas emissions from electricity.

The basic premise is that additional DLR warms the skin layer a bit, which means that heat transfer from below decreases because it decreases both conduction (obviously) AND the overnight natural convection that SoD described.

Because if the atmospheric CO2 content increases by ~ 5 GtC in a year caused by natural variability and we subtract 10 GtC of human CO2, we end up with a decrease.

Also, because of the new thermostats, natural gas usage decreased by 15 %, or about 1000 CCF over the past year.

Another possibility we've written about on TreeHugger is pesticide spraying, which weakens plants» natural defenses because they're not forced to fend for themselves, thereby decreasing their nutrient profile.