Addressing the intense market volatility of cryptocurrencies, Giancarlo said that he doesn't know where
the natural equilibrium point is but mentioned that «some economists posit that there is a relationship» between bitcoin's value and the difficulty or cost to mine the cryptocurrency, which may designate a price floor.
This behavior is characteristic of an unchanging (at least in short terms of centuries)
natural equilibrium point for CO2 around 280ppm (interglacial - normal).
Not exact matches
It is at this
point that we lose the
natural harmony and
equilibrium with our body.
By stimulating the reflex
points, it may help improve nerve and blood circulation, and restore the body to its
natural state of
equilibrium.
«I always believed there would be a
natural point of
equilibrium with digital reading — that it would overshoot, then come back and settle down.
Question: before talking about simulating climate CHANGE, how long does the climate science community expect it to take before GCM's can reproduce the real world climate PRIOR to human induced CO2 perturbation in terms of: — «
equilibrium point», i.e. without artificial flux adjustment to avoid climatic drift, — «
natural variability», in terms of, for instance, the Hurst coefficient at different locations on the planet?
In my earlier posting, I tried to make the distinction that global climate change (all that is changing in the climate system) can be separated into: (1) the global warming component that is driven primarily by the increase in greenhouse gases, and (2) the
natural (externally unforced) variability of the climate system consisting of temperature fluctuations about an
equilibrium reference
point, which therefore do not contribute to the long - term trend.
Also note that human induced warming probably will trigger
natural C02 / methane emissions leading to further warming so anthropogenic source will probably play a decreasing role in the amount of C02 in the atmosphere as the planet moves to a new
equilibrium point.
The notes on this
point are self - contradictory: This derivation of [CO2](t) does not assume any given
equilibrium between ingress and egress...» ANSWER: the only assumption made is that absorption is proportional to the CO2 content of the air; it applies equally to the both parts or sets of molecules of the air, the anthropic (24 ppm) and the
natural (376 ppm); this makes NO hypothesis about ingress»
It really doesn't matter but I suppose it would have to be the change in
natural emissions from that
point where it stays in
equilibrium.
He mentions at one
point that increased CO2 from
natural sources results in a temporary (not quantified) absorption of heat in the lower troposphere before thermal
equilibrium is restored as the CO2 is released into space from higher and cooler parts of the atmosphere.