Never in the history of human kind has any supernatural or divine explanation ever proven true... but many, many have proven to have a far better,
simpler natural explanation.
We've done this since the beginning, and slowly over the years have shown again and again that it is not ghosts but perfectly
reasonable natural explanations.
Point is that the only «proof» we ever hear about gods are the lack of easily understandable proofs or
other natural explanations for our existance.
The high - water mark of the historical - critical method is the approach of the early - nineteenth - century scholar H. E. G. Paulus, who sought
purely natural explanations for biblical miracles.
But as the sciences began to develop, they gradually brought to light
quite natural explanations for some aspects of observable phenomena which had previously been regarded as of supernatural origin.
Please, recall that this began with your claim of evidence, i.e. «There is no
current natural explanation of... therefore the suppernatural is necessary» (paraphrased, obviously.
Fagan notes that «As scientists began to
seek natural explanations for climatic phenomena, witchcraft receded slowly into the background.»
Well - meaning interpreters have sometimes gone too far in trying to defend the accuracy of the Bible
by natural explanations of supernatural events.
So it becomes really interesting when a signal with
few natural explanations is detected and, according to astronomer Nick Suntzeff of Texas A&M University in an interview with Ars Technica, a radio signal at this frequency is, well, «strange.»
New Paper Spurns Anthropogenic CO2 Warming,
Unveils Natural Explanation For Climate Change University of California (Santa Cruz) Professor W. Jackson Davis (Ph.D.), President of the Environmental Studies Institute, has published a new paper with colleagues in the journal Climate that thoroughly undermines the conceptualization of a dominant role for anthropogenic CO2 in the global warming since 1850.
Out of 928 papers whose abstracts she surveyed, she wrote, 75 percent explicitly or implicitly supported anthropogenic global warming, 25 percent were methodological or otherwise took no position on the subject — and none argued for
purely natural explanations.
The
most natural explanation is that the universe is made up only of matter and contains no large reservoir of anti-matter.
Psychology has helped us during the twentieth century to understand the creativity of the human psyche so that we have now a
quite natural explanation for, say, the voices heard by Joan of Arc and the vision of John in the Book of Revelation.