Sentences with phrase «natural kind has»

Not exact matches

Swiss company Nestlé announced plans to remove artificial flavours from its candy products, the first major firm of its kind to do so in the U.S. (A day later, Hershey said it would start using more natural ingredients in its products, too.)
Had the deal closed, the sale of a half - interest in the Cutbank Ridge shale gas play would have been the largest investment of any kind by a Chinese state - controlled firm in Canada and the biggest reason to expect to see Asia - bound liquefied natural gas tankers docking on the West Coast in the not - too - distant future.
«I haven't seen anything like this kind of cooperation,» says Ralph Cavanagh, codirector of the Natural Resources Defense Council's energy program.
And I've played a lot of conflict characters or that enter into conflict so it's kind of a natural thing for an actor.
An alarming finding, but critics have suggested the results were skewed by the researchers» use of a synthetic vitamin E, which lacks the powerful antioxidants found in the natural kind.
In other words, those happen because those are natural firsts, those happen naturally because of evolution but can you create those kind of important moments in your life and it really comes down to creating doing new things, always creating — you have to be a little more creative when you get older to create those new things but those are the things you think about which I think are quite important.
The U.K. economy has resumed that kind of natural growth process and the U.S. has.
That kind of short - term thinking has engineered a major bottom in petroleum, and now that type of thinking may have an on impact natural gas.
The market has yet to reach critical mass, but given the kinds of projects funded by state and local governments, «the market should be a natural issuer of green and social impact bonds,» notes Victoria Irving, Equity Strategist for the Global Sustainability Research team.
The inventiveness of human beings has devised new means for exploiting the natural resources of the world — tools and machines of all kinds; and materials have been contrived by human beings out of combinations of natural materials in order to satisfy new wants.
Never in the history of human kind has any supernatural or divine explanation ever proven true... but many, many have proven to have a far better, simpler natural explanation.
Forasmuch as each man is a part of the human race, and human nature is something social, and has for a great and natural good, the power also of friendship; on this account God willed to create all men out of one, in order that they might be held in their society not only by likeness of kind, but also by bond of kindred.
Not long ago, the idea that oral or anal sex is as natural as the reproductive kind would have been greeted with general disgust, and even legal disapproval.
The forming of categories achieves a stability of a natural kind that is unlike the artificial properties of intellectual analysis that have to carry the full weight of logical stability for objects that are otherwise unrepeatable.
This infusion of the soul is a kind of natural covenant that God has with His creation; whenever a new human being is conceived He gives the soul so that it can be indeed a human being; however, He allows the will of the two parents to be primary in this, so that it is they who decide - even if at times unwittingly!
Which is kind of weird because if we could actually observe the supernatural then it would have to become part of our reality and thus be natural.
Jesus commends those who have made themselves eunuchs for the sake of the Kingdom of heaven (Matthew 19: 12).20 Christian celibacy is dedication to a pattern of life in which one fruitful and natural kind of experience is renounced for the sake of service to God and neighbour.
As we have just seen, Christian realism leads to the conclusion that violence is natural and normal to man and society, that violence is a kind of necessity imposed on governors and governed, on rich and poor.
We can see only hints of divine beauty, and if some poets or artists seem to have a talent for seeing a particular kind of natural beauty it does not follow that they will also see or appreciate supernatural beauty (for example, in people, liturgy, or scripture).
Christ came among men with a simple ministry of teaching whose main purpose was to confirm that the kinds of ways in which God had been understood in Natural religion, and the very language used to express those insights, were broadly right.
He felt that Whitehead had yielded to the natural human tendency to conceive of God in terms which offered a merely pleasant feeling about religion without demanding the kind of ultimate commitment to the creative process itself which Wieman felt was urgently needed.
Both describe a kind of isolated individualism that is a human construction that would require constant technological maintenance against the real impulses of nature — a world so unnatural or unerotic that people would even be repulsed by the idea of natural reproduction.
Some kind of overarching intellect must have been at work in the design of the natural order.
For Reid it is by a «natural kind of magic» that we take them to stand for these objects; there are no grounds in experience for making this association.9 As we have seen, Whitehead disagrees with Reid in that he holds that we have a direct intuition or «feeling» of external objects as causes of sensations.
My relatively nonpartisan definition of JUDICIAL ACTIVISM has to do with an objection to «natural rights» or any other kind of «rights / liberty» jurisprudence — whether it flows from Randy Barnett or Rawls or Hadley Arkes.
There never was a time in History that atheists exist, only in this present stage of our intellectual developement that they deny His exisrence, but it can be easily explained that they are just part of the dialectical process of having to have two opposing arguments or forces to arrive to the truth, The opposing forces today are the theists or religious believers of all religions and the other are the atheists who denies religion, The reslultant truth in the future will be Panthrotheism, the belief that we are all one with the whole universe with God, and that we Had all to unite to prepare for human survival that will subject us humans in the future.Aided by the the enlightend consevationist, environmentalists, humanists and all of the concerned activists, we will develop a kind of universal harmony and awareness that we are all guided towards love and concern for all of our specie.The great concern of the whole conscious and caring world to the natural disaster in the Phillipines,, the most theist country now is a positive sign towards this religious direction.Panthrotheism means we will be One with God.
the belief on the existence of the devil was concieved by theologians of the past thousands of years, there was no other way of explaining the bad experiences of people in the past because we were not educated yet to the kind of what we have now, Why this happened because that was part of the learning process that God wants us to know, in pathrotheism, we are part of God, and He himself is evolving because He is the universe, We are now the conscious part of Him, our destiny in accordance to his will also be His destiny because it is His will.Although He prepared first all the material reality of the universe ahead of us, The experiences for us humans including the supernatural is just part of nirmal process for learning because its natural process, today we reach a point of not believing the practices of the past, but it does not mean its wrong, Just like a child, adults loved to tell mythical stories to them, because we knew children enjoys it as part of their learning process.
It's a film about natural disasters, which have grown so prevalent and destructive that global governments form a kind of alliance — in an attempt to save the world.
Natural catastrophes would still occur, though eventually some kind of protection even from them might be found.
I think given equal opportunities there will be a natural inclination for many towards traditional roles and that this is healthy, has nothing to do with any artificial social construct but is natural and comes out of biology and now might be the time to be having open discussions about this kind of thing without having to face the fear of being labelled misogynistic for doing so or with feeling fearful of any threat to equality.
Nevertheless, it would stretch the meaning of «natural theology» too far to include this kind of historical analysis within it.
Just as the old Adam is understood more clearly in the face of Christ, natural law has a kind of brilliance in the light of the New Covenant.
Kind or ironic when people who think the universe was designed for the sole purpose of God planning to have a relationship with them accuse people of being arrogant because they claim science is a better way to understand the natural world.
I realize that the natural sciences often get a pass in these kinds of discussions, but I would contend they should not.
But in our situation, in which the mind or soul has been naturalized into the spatiotemporal continuum, can natural theology suggest any «place» for any kind of life after death?
His idea of God, whether as an immanent being working through natural events, a transcendent being above yet influencing events, or a transcendent - immanent God both related and not related to history, has to be placed within some kind of world view.
It has been argued, I think convincingly, that we can not sensibly ask that kind of question of natural non-living systems.
Over the years I've learned to control my fists, but I've watched as the word retarded has become more and more commonplace on the tongues of those around me — good, loving, kind people who know my brother, know me and can't help but use a word that has become so natural to their vocabulary.
Evolutionists have all kinds of evidence for natural selection, but ZERO evidence for nothing turning into something and ZERO evidence for one creature changing into other creatures.
In our view, the delegates who dominated the first Vatican - sponsored conference on evolution, in 2009, as well as members of the American Center for Theology and the Natural Sciences, have been all too inclined to support this kind of thinking.
Protestant theology believed that it could rely on the «personalist» relation of the I - Thou kind and develop on this basis a theocentric personalism that would escape the difficulties of a natural theology in the Catholic vein, a natural theology considered as a hypostasis of cosmology.
The conceptions which the saints have of the loveliness of God, and that kind of delight which they experience in it, are quite peculiar, and entirely different from anything which a natural man can possess, or of which he can form any proper notion.»
~ the music and visual entertainment that resembles more to something spewed out of the pits of hell, then something human beings would dream up, unless they are demon possessed... ~ the perversion of God's natural order and His intent for human kind, and justifying of it, calling it good, even using the Name of Christ to justify it, such as this article is clearly showing...
Now that kind of thinking about God which looks for evidence of His activity in phenomena which have no natural explanation is often referred to as a belief in the «God of the gaps».
As time goes buy the kind defenders of free will over their rejection to «dead» here and colossians 2:13 tend to resort to a familiar defense, that of labeling it a Calvinist viewpoint and that its almost a cultist view point to hold.Very sad yet very much the defense of many christians.Dead may i suggest is dead, the inability to respond, does not mean that prior to being saved one could not read scripture but because of this spiritual deadness its not profitabel / meaningful - we just can not continue to revise the meaning of dead to fit a view point - because natural man has not been born again this deadness (spiritually) shows itself as «none seek after God», in this condition they are» slaves to sin» and the spiritual things of God (the bible) is «folly / foolishness» even the gospel is judged by natural man as «folly / foolishness «(1 cor.1: 18) Please stop with this weak / common defense called Calvinism - many believers are truly turned off by such a defense.We must not forget the man's «free will» is what took the whole human race down in the garden; i would hope we can rise above our love affair with the human will.
Recently, Reformed pastors like Mark Driscoll and John Piper have revived this kind of language, Driscoll explaining that the Gospel begins with «God hates you, and it's going to go really really bad forever,» Piper concluding that natural disasters like the Asian tsunami and presumably the Haitian earthquake are acts of judgment by a holy God on an unholy people, stern illustrations of what we all deserve.
Jana has already described several events of both kinds ¯ both happy arrangements of natural events and, on the other side, events so improbable as to appear to be miraculous.
Hasker's third proposition is that for the problem of divine non-intervention to be a real problem, «we must be able to identify specific kinds of cases in which God morally ought to intervene but does not» Many critics of (traditional) theism probably already have a more or less vague list of such cases, which might include genocidal events, such as the Nazi holocaust and the Rwandan massacre; wars; large - scale natural disasters; conditions of chronic poverty, in which millions of children die from starvation or are permanently stunted because of inadequate protein; the sexual molestation of children, which often leaves them psychologically scarred for the rest of their lives; death preceded by long, painful illnesses, such as cancer or AIDS, or by mind - destroying conditions, such as Alzheimer's disease; and the kinds of events described by Dostoyevski, such as the soldier using his pistol to get a mother's baby to giggle with delight and then blowing its brains out.
The recognition that economic growth has caused natural disasters and is leading toward far more catastrophic ones has had a different kind of effect.
First, as a being animated with life (including self - nutrition, growth and reproduction, sensation and movement thinking and willing), the person has a natural superiority over all non-living substances; then also, as a being manifesting life of the highest kind, rational life, the person has superiority over all non-rational creatures
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z