While Catholics and Protestants alike typically read Aquinas first for
his natural law doctrine and next for his proofs of God's existence, topics which seem to stress the human capability of discovering God's truth, these volumes portray an Aquinas far more focused on the mystery of God.
In recent years, scholars have proficiently expounded Thomas»
natural law doctrine in terms of moral epistemology, moral virtue, philosophy of nature, or metaphysics of the good.
Natural law doctrine only makes sense in a universe governed by a benevolent Creator.
Not exact matches
Deism is the
doctrine that God created the world and its
natural laws but takes no further part in its functioning, he does not interfere in the day - to - day workings of the universe, he does not concern himself with humans and our affairs.
«New
natural law» is an oxymoron if
natural law is by definition immutable, and invoking it to impute intrinsic evil to capital punishment paves the way — logically, if unintentionally — to undermining
doctrine against contraception, abortion, and sexual inversion.
He draws on a naturalistic morality, not entirely unlike
natural law, rather than invoking
doctrines of revealed religion.
To the extent that in canon
law there are maxims which belong to divine, immutable
law and derive from the essence of
natural or supernatural realities, they also belong to the Church's
doctrine of faith, to its dogma.
But the
natural law alone is not able to offer a positive rational
doctrine of what life ought to be.
I think he goes wrong, however, in saying that «
natural law alone is not able to offer a positive rational
doctrine of what life ought to be.»
«To imply this would be to deny the workings of the very «nature» that
natural -
law doctrine defends.»
Levering is also correct to suggest that a similar reaction to modern
natural -
law doctrines, if somewhat less prickly than the Protestant version, was more than a little influential in twentieth - century Catholic theology.
The subject lacks what Benedict XVI calls «breathing room,» which is a point the theologian Matthew Levering proves he understands when, in his new book Biblical
Natural Law, he urges theologians to take a more active interest in the doctrine of natur
Natural Law, he urges theologians to take a more active interest in the doctrine of natural l
Law, he urges theologians to take a more active interest in the
doctrine of
naturalnatural lawlaw.
He offers his work as a «first step toward reclaiming
natural -
law doctrine as an exegetical, and not solely philosophical, project» that is, «
natural law» as understood by the Christian tradition prior to the modern reconfiguration of
natural law.»
«Biblical
natural law,» he argues, «avoids the self - cleaving tendency in anthropocentric
natural -
law doctrine and instead recognizes human fulfillment as achieved through imitation of the divine ecstasis.»
It is the static character of the
doctrines of the orders and of
natural law theories which is their limitation.
For the others, I have considerable respect and at least some sympathy — but somewhere along the winding trail from
natural law to theological
doctrine, he and I part company (though I'd happily tag along as what the Communists used to call a fellow traveler, if he'd tolerate the company).
Much of the Thomism criticized by Barth did appear to treat reason and
natural law as though they were independent of a Christian
doctrine of God.
Making matters worse is that although
natural law is widely (and somewhat misleadingly) considered a Christian
doctrine, Christians often find it no less mysterious than others do.
Thus he saw no obstacle to the development of a complete
doctrine of
natural law.
We start with the Church's teaching that the Marriage Act must always remain open to life, the
doctrine that artificial contraception is against the
natural moral
law.
This bleak interpretation left the Reformers but two possibilities for the project of developing a normative
doctrine of
natural law.
This statement is at total odds with
natural law theology... The Thomistic synthesis, which Hittinger clearly represents when he connects
natural law to a
doctrine of God, unearths the far - reaching background behind the rise of contemporary atheism in dialectical theology's placing these two revelations in opposition.
For Novak, however, nothing could be more disastrous for Judaism than to admit Socrates, Plato, the Stoics, Grotius, and Kant into the operative logic of Jewish jurisprudence, for not only did the ancient advocates of
natural law such as Plato and the Stoics lack a
doctrine of creation, but even Grotius and Kant» devout monotheists though they were» imported a false philosophy into God's sovereign dealings with the human race:
The 1985 Congregation for the
Doctrine of the Faith Instruction on Respect for Human Life states, «By virtue of its substantial union with a spiritual soul, the human body can not be... evaluated in the same way as the body of animals... The
natural moral
law expresses and lays down the purposes, rights and duties which are based upon the bodily and spiritual nature of the human person.»
They seem to go directly against the basic teaching that you quote in the introductory remarks:»... the
doctrine that artificial contraception is against the
natural moral
law» and the whole tenor of Fr Dylan James and Luke Gormally's articles earlier on.
This resource covers
Natural Moral
Law including: - The origins of
Natural Law - Aquinas» theory of
Natural Moral
Law - The
Doctrine of Double Effect - The strengths and weaknesses of
Natural Law I would recommend this revision map to be printed and enlarged to A3 paper for maximum benefit.
Michael C. Blumm & Rachel D. Guthrie, Internationalizing the Public Trust
Doctrine:
Natural Law and Constitutional and Statutory Approaches to Fulfilling the Saxion Vision, 45 U.C. Davis L. Rev. 741 (2012).