This Jesus is proclaimed as the revelation of a God who is not dependent on
the natural orders of this world to achieve his ends.
From
the natural order of the world comes its dependability, without which there would be no science, no ordered control of physical forces or events, none of the security which comes from knowing that the physical world is at least in large measure calculable.
Eating fruits and vegetables that are in season puts us in harmony with
the natural order of the world around us, and nourishes our bodies in the best way possible.
Most of us don't take time to think about what the true
natural order of the world is.
Not exact matches
In
order for this to work, as Bill Nye pointed out there have to be
natural laws established and provable, repeatable and predictive
of future experimental results that hold up to peer review by the whole
world of true scientists.
There is
order ALL around, and it is a corollary
of the matter and
natural forces which shape the
world.
Now, you are telling us that it's about the «proper
order»
of temporal,
natural things here in this
world (family, church) which, as far as you know, will cease when we get to heaven.
The inventiveness
of human beings has devised new means for exploiting the
natural resources
of the
world — tools and machines
of all kinds; and materials have been contrived by human beings out
of combinations
of natural materials in
order to satisfy new wants.
A justified process - rooted philosophical appreciation
of social canons can be taught through a pedagogical strategy that begins with their critique, that expunges them from the
natural given furnishings
of the immediately real in
order to rediscover them as the inherited cultural accretions by which we transform the immediately real into a
world of enduring meanings and human significance.
What ties together Shenk's different arguments is what I call the divine inversion — the many ways in which God acts contrary not merely to physical nature, but to what humans take to be the
natural order of things in the social and political
world.
In starting with the evolving
world, I do not presuppose like the naturalists or Marxists that the
world is self - sufficient, i.e., that it has all the powers needed to evolve itself, for this presupposition which is really nothing else but the notion
of an Aristotelian nature has not really transcended the dualism
of a
natural and a supernatural
order.
We do not need to reject or twist defined doctrines in
order to present our faith credibly in this new age
of discovery, neither do we need to distance ourselves from the scientific consensus about the
natural world.
Just as Thomas Malthus had shown how population had the capacity to increase faster than the food supply, so this computer - based report concluded that
world order would collapse if population growth, industrial expansion, increased pollution and the depletion
of natural resources were to continue at current rates.
Is it not a scandal how few
of the clergy and professors
of theology decide to devote their lives directly to the study
of the
natural order — as more
of them did in centuries past to the
world's everlasting benefit?
This is clear in Whitehead's description
of the
natural social
order: «In reference to any given society, the
world of actual entities is to he conceived as forming a background in layers
of social
order, the defining characteristics become wider and more general as we widen the background» (PR 98 / 150).
As the empty tomb
of Christ above all reveals, the verdict
of God that rescues and redeems creation also overturns the
order of the fallen
world, and shatters the powers
of historical and
natural necessity that the fallen
world comprises.
Even granting something like the teleological
order I have asserted, however, some may doubt that this formulation adequately states our responsibilities to our
natural habitat, especially responsibilities to the diversity
of species in the nonhuman
world and to individual animals, at least within species whose members exhibit the capacity to suffer.
This insight explains the vehemence
of his attack upon the German quest for the historical Jesus, just as it illuminates his behavior» during his first years at Lambaréné, when he ransacked the intellectual storehouses
of the
world's religions in
order to find some way to conceive
of an affirmation
of the
world that was not merely mindless hedonism, a way that could motivate a powerful urge toward human betterment, toward perfection within the structures
of natural existence.
A «specific divine action» is required in
order to produce «a new level
of being,» one which the
natural world can not reach on its own resources.
The
natural scientists, especially the elite group who are members
of the National Association
of Scientists, have taken Einstein's advice that a personal God could not intervene in a
world of «
ordered regularity
of all events» and that «religion should give up a God who concerns himself with fates and actions
of human beings.»
God the Creator in his wisdom and goodness has chosen to make a
world of human freedom,
of natural order, and
of intricately interwoven physical and social relationships.
By «modern common sense» we mean the basic understanding that in
order to explain the events and circumstances
of this
natural world we must look to other events and circumstances within this
natural world.
The conception
of God as immanent in the
world order was one
of the ideas by which nineteenth - century theology sought to get God back into the
world from which a strictly Darwinian interpretation
of the
natural processes would seem to have excluded Him.
Insofar as God controls the
world, he is responsible for evil: directly in terms
of the
natural order, and indirectly in the case
of man.
And the reason I still pray for a divine interruption in the
natural order of things, in the way
of the
world, is because I believe that God is, truly, wonderfully, redemptively, Love.
But the root cause
of the opinion that God is a threat to human creativity is due not to a defect in logic but to the false assumptions derived from a static frame
of reference that pictures God as a metaphysical and Transcendent Other, and this
world as an autonomous
natural order.
The basic realities they conceptualized in
order to explain the phenomena and
natural events
of their
world they spoke
of as gods and spirits.
It is an absurd, but nonetheless real, challenge to defend the idea that «true» and «false» exist, that «right» and «wrong» have meaning, that the contours
of the
natural world have significance, and
order, and law.
They saw the connection between our industrial system, the striving everywhere to extract more from the
natural world in
order to expand the artificial one, and the decay
of eco-systems.
This self - activity is denied to the
world as a whole if God is its primary (coercive) cause, and it is denied to the individual parts if they are determined by the secondary causes
of the
natural order acting in God's stead.
As
natural men, Paul is saying, we die; as members
of the new community we share proleptically in the life
of the
world to come, the new and divine
order which is indeed already breaking in upon us.
The wise sought guidance in the
natural order of creation itself, in the visible workings
of a stable
world.
The latter are needed in
order to check the tendencies
of the former to replace the
natural world with an unsustainable and inhuman artificial one.
The practitioner must avoid such laziness and actively root out deceptive ideas in
order to be fully available to the awesome dimensions
of the
natural world.
Science presumes an intelligible underlying
order; and also, given that the human mind is directly related to the
natural order and thus to the whole
of the cosmos, this relatedness means that the
world can not be accidental.
The Beatified Scientist An important part
of combating the myth
of the opposition
of faith and science is a proper historical appreciation
of the irreplaceable contribution
of men
of faith to the rise
of science and its great leaps: scientists who rigorously studied the
natural world precisely because it is God's own
order given to the
world that makes it rational and worthy
of investigation.
A brilliant school
of interpretation
of Greek mythology would have it that in their origin the Greek gods were only half - metaphoric personifications
of those great spheres
of abstract law and
order into which the
natural world falls apart — the sky — sphere, the ocean - sphere, the earth - sphere, and the like; just as even now we may speak
of the smile
of the morning, the kiss
of the breeze, or the bite
of the cold, without really meaning that these phenomena
of nature actually wear a human face.
Darwin's theory
of the
natural selection
of chance variations put an emphasis on the role
of chance in determining the
order of nature in the living
world.
Scenic vistas are certainly to be valued, but one
of the things that has to be resisted is a knee - jerk impulse to keep things in the
natural world exactly the way they are in
order to continue looking at them.
The image
of God as a supernatural being, who from time to time intervenes in the affairs
of the
natural world in clearly recognizable ways, and who can suspend or reverse the usual behavior
of natural phenomena, if He so wishes, in
order to perform His will, is one which has become less and less tenable as the new
world has emerged.
Yet it can not be denied that many persons have been impressed by the
order and beauty
of the
world, the intricate complexity and interdependence
of natural forms; a response
of wonder in confronting nature is not confined to primitive man.
In any case, the hypothesis
of physical chance posits an indeterminacy at the base
of cosmic reality, and this again forces us to ask whether the
natural world is influenced by any sort
of ordering principle.
I was simlpy making the point that in the
natural world all things tend toward decay or disorder, and that any
order (ie the resence
of intelligent life), is a strong evidence for the existance
of God (Higher intelligence).
He is also in relationship to the
world of nature, from which he has been produced through the purpose and act
of God; he is not a stranger in the
natural order, but genuinely a part
of it, although as human he is also distinct from it.
Again, the insistence on the societal nature
of the
world, and on man's genuine participation since he himself is organic to that
world, illuminates the Christian belief that man belongs to the creation and that the whole
natural order, as well as human history and personal experience, is integral to the purpose
of God.
This is observable law all around the entire known universe, and without the intervention
of intelligence there is not one singe recorded instance
of the
natural world resulting in greater
order or organization.
For process thought, «nature» includes the total experienced and experienceable
world; it comprises the whole
natural order with its power
of creating, recreating, and redeeming the human person.
Indeed, in my experience, visiting the Bodies exhibit was much more like reading the scientific writings
of a J. Henri Fabre or an Erwin Straus (in short,
of scientists who reveal beauty,
order, and meaning in the
natural world) than like reading a clinical biology textbook.
Loren Eiseley thought that much
of the modern scientific enterprise had removed humanity ever farther from its sense
of responsibility to the
natural world it had left in
order to create an artificial
world to satisfy its own insatiable appetites.
We then talked about the inevitability
of progress by
natural evolution and were quite sure the perfect
world order was soon to come.