«I always believed there would be
a natural point of equilibrium with digital reading — that it would overshoot, then come back and settle down.
Not exact matches
By stimulating the reflex
points, it may help improve nerve and blood circulation, and restore the body to its
natural state
of equilibrium.
Question: before talking about simulating climate CHANGE, how long does the climate science community expect it to take before GCM's can reproduce the real world climate PRIOR to human induced CO2 perturbation in terms
of: — «
equilibrium point», i.e. without artificial flux adjustment to avoid climatic drift, — «
natural variability», in terms
of, for instance, the Hurst coefficient at different locations on the planet?
In my earlier posting, I tried to make the distinction that global climate change (all that is changing in the climate system) can be separated into: (1) the global warming component that is driven primarily by the increase in greenhouse gases, and (2) the
natural (externally unforced) variability
of the climate system consisting
of temperature fluctuations about an
equilibrium reference
point, which therefore do not contribute to the long - term trend.
Also note that human induced warming probably will trigger
natural C02 / methane emissions leading to further warming so anthropogenic source will probably play a decreasing role in the amount
of C02 in the atmosphere as the planet moves to a new
equilibrium point.
This behavior is characteristic
of an unchanging (at least in short terms
of centuries)
natural equilibrium point for CO2 around 280ppm (interglacial - normal).
The notes on this
point are self - contradictory: This derivation
of [CO2](t) does not assume any given
equilibrium between ingress and egress...» ANSWER: the only assumption made is that absorption is proportional to the CO2 content
of the air; it applies equally to the both parts or sets
of molecules
of the air, the anthropic (24 ppm) and the
natural (376 ppm); this makes NO hypothesis about ingress»
He mentions at one
point that increased CO2 from
natural sources results in a temporary (not quantified) absorption
of heat in the lower troposphere before thermal
equilibrium is restored as the CO2 is released into space from higher and cooler parts
of the atmosphere.
Addressing the intense market volatility
of cryptocurrencies, Giancarlo said that he doesn't know where the
natural equilibrium point is but mentioned that «some economists posit that there is a relationship» between bitcoin's value and the difficulty or cost to mine the cryptocurrency, which may designate a price floor.