There is a potential instability in
natural supernaturalism.
Carlyle was adamantly Protestant and thought that the church as an invisible reality was a critical counterpart to
a natural supernaturalism that informed the body politic.
But it was his other big book,
Natural Supernaturalism: Tradition and Revolution in Romantic Literature (1971), that I remember best.
Natural Supernaturalism was important for me to read, because Abrams shows the many ways in which the Romantic movement was at odds with orthodox Christianity.
Not exact matches
Kaplan maintains that the Jewish religion can and should be divorced from
supernaturalism and come to be associated with the
natural processes of body and mind.
The idea that God's power is manifest essentially in the suspension or abrogation of
natural law makes
supernaturalism untenable.
All too commonly today
supernaturalism means splitting the universe in two — on one side nature, run by
natural laws, on the other side the supernatural that ever and again breaks into the
natural, disturbs its regular procedures, and suspends its laws.
Man's total dependence on and submission to an authoritarian God is also in tension with human responsibility and maturity;
supernaturalism has too often resulted in the repression rather than the fulfillment of man's
natural vitalities.
But furthermore — and this is perhaps Darwin's greatest contribution — he developed a set of new principles that influence the thinking of every person: the living world, through evolution, can be explained without recourse to
supernaturalism; essentialism or typology is invalid, and we must adopt population thinking, in which all individuals are unique (vital for education and the refutation of racism);
natural selection, applied to social groups, is indeed sufficient to account for the origin and maintenance of altruistic ethical systems; cosmic teleology, an intrinsic process leading life automatically to ever greater perfection, is fallacious, with all seemingly teleological phenomena explicable by purely material processes; and determinism is thus repudiated, which places our fate squarely in our own evolved hands.
It's easy to like True Blood, because Ball's episodic smarts are primal, not at a remove, and he approaches
supernaturalism by emphasizing the
natural over the super.
I think religion is not
natural based on a rational assessment thus I have logically identified it as mere
supernaturalism and superstition.
When a one has naturally achieved, by one's
natural capacity of reason, a metaphysical / epistemological system that has determined that to live a life of reason then one by necessity must exclusively exercise one's
natural free volition to exclusively use man's
natural capacity for reason exclusively on the
natural world then one does not even reject religion's
supernaturalism / superstitionism... one then has achieved the capability to say religion's
supernaturalism and superstitionism is irrelevant to their metaphysical / epistemological system.