Sentences with phrase «nature about answering»

I love the candid, humorous nature about answering these questions.

Not exact matches

Since no one in this world does not have any one answer for every single child in the mother's womb about whom the child will become, there is no one answer for the nature of existence, especially humans.

i really disagree lol, i don't intend to be dramatic at all, i just do nt like fluffy answers, and when it's discussed on a blog about the nature of existence, i feel it's ok for me to really try to explore.

Assuming it was Christianity, it ameliorated many of the harsh realities of human existence, such as your own death, the death of a loved one, injustice, feelings of being at the mercy of the forces of nature, and so on, gave you answers to questions about life, and so on.

Now if we regard all real religions as attempts to get at a special kind of truth to provide some answer to man's intuitions about his own nature, we shall, I believe, find that what we know as «Christianity» comprehends, develops and fulfills all that at heart we hold to be true.

They usually answered questions about the nature of God and redemption in an embarrassed, defensive, or ingratiating way.

It is an astounding detail when you think about it: The God of all creation, the One who knows every corner of the cosmos and fathoms every mystery, the One who could answer every theological riddle and who, I suspect, chuckles at our volumes of guesses, our centuries of pompous philosophical tomes debating His nature, when present in the person of Jesus Christ, told stories.

The answer lies in what was said in chapter one about the nature of God and his relations with men.

In speaking about his views of eternity on Wednesday, answering a question from a caller based in Atlanta, Romney was echoing Mormon beliefs about the eternal nature of human existence.

Jesus answered evenly, speaking important truth about the earthbound nature of marriage which will give way to the greater life promised to the children of» the resurrection (that beautiful phrase, lost on those with no ears to hear).

Science majors, along with other students, should confront the perennial questions about the nature of man, God, and the goals of life, and some of the diverse answers which have been given.

Jesus may very well be the answer, but if you want a good conversation, you may need to clarify what the question is, because the first question is not about eternal life, but about the nature of reality itself.

Such a non-utilitarian faith does not undertake to show that in the Christian gospel we can find the solution to all the problems of human existence any more than that we can find in the Scriptures answers to all the questions we raise about the world of nature.

Indeed, the nub of the whole inquiry about the nature of Deity lies in the answer to this question: Where do we think in our experience we touch the near end of God?

We debate endlessly about Peace, Democracy, the Rights of Man, the conditions of racial and individual eugenics, the value and morality of scientific research pushed to the uttermost limit, and the true nature of the Kingdom of God; but here again, how can we fail to see that each of these inescapable questions has two aspects, and therefore two answers, according to whether we regard the human species as culminating in the individual or as pursuing a collective course towards higher levels of complexity and consciousness?

The level of stupidity of someone who can say what you did while being serious, is just the level needed to answer my arguments about the contradictory nature of defending the freedom to suppress freedom with that drivel.

* These are three ways Christianity has answered the question about the nature of God.

Every answer to the question about the theological adequacy of any particular picture of the movement of theological education is tied to some picture of the nature of Christian theology itself.

Too often the answer to this question is left implicit in proposals about the nature and purpose of theological education, and the answer's coherence with the view of theology that the proposals adopt is left unexamined.

Even civilized peoples ask and answer questions about the meaning of human life, the reality of their existence, the nature of the world and the calamities they undergo.

To argue heatedly about something no one really knows the answer to is ridicluous and that is the ultimate nature of existence, it's all opinion or «faith» if you will.

By working toward a realistic metaphysics — in line with common sense — Whitehead is attempting to answer some of the basic questions about the nature of causality, actuality, the mental and physical poles.

Lexington, KY About Blog We believe that nature provides the perfect answer to help you look and feel your best, by using all natural health products that feed and nourish your body.

So naturally, just as it is in my nature to say folks and turn Irish drinking songs into songs about pumpkins, it is also in my nature to answer the question of pumpkin puree with a delicious cupcake.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

They are a direct answer to Ina May and Gloria Lemay's anecdotes about how animals birth perfectly in nature.

Questions and answers about what is happening at Tidmarsh, as it returns to its natural state, will be an important part of connecting visitors to science and nature.

Let a lactation consultant from Nature to Nurture provide reassurance about breastfeeding norms or answer quick questions about returning to work, sleeping through the night, or starting solids.

There were several proposed names for the Jewish state, but if the question is about the nature of the Jewish state, not its name, the answer would be definitely positive.

This would seem to preempt your questions by answering the precise nature of the values espoused and defer arguments about the best means for advancing these values.

When reporters inquired about the nature and substance of the «interview,» the mayor declined to answer.

Theories abound about the nature of this elusive energy, and Perlmutter is hotly pursuing observational evidence to help find the answer.

In addition to helping scientists answer fundamental questions about the nature of matter, the material is theorized to have a wide range of applications, including as a room - temperature superconductor.

For example, there is probably a material answer to philosophical questions about the nature of reality.

As the question hints, to fully answer this we need to understand something about the fundamental nature of space - time.

The mission has answered one long - standing question about the nature and behavior of the belts, and revealed that the outer belt can split into two separate belts.

A scientist with the Canadian Museum of Nature has answered a long - standing mystery about why fossils of ankylosaurs — the «armoured tanks» of the dinosaur world — are mainly found belly - side up.

«With the results from the WB - 57s and complementary observations from space and other experiments on the ground we have an opportunity to answer some of the most fundamental questions about the nature of the corona.»

Researchers are also hoping that it will open the door to answering some of the most basic questions about the nature of our genetic endowment, though no one expects the answers to come easily: making sense of the information produced by «blind» sequencing will be a daunting task.

Naturally, it is not possible to explain all nature's known properties to a student in grade 8, and I now know that his answers were in fact very good, but at that time I could not really accept that the full truth about nature is not known, and that he could not explain it all to me.

Some answers about the asteroid's true nature are beginning to emerge as researchers analyze the data collected by Rosetta.

After fielding questions from other legislators on unrelated topics, Holdren mentioned the list in the course of answering a question about the nature of scientific consensus from Representative John Sarbanes (D - MD), who shares Holdren's views on climate change.

The study, published in Nature Communications on July 19, «finally answers a long - standing question about whether humans can see single photons — they can!»

Throughout the week, some of the researchers expressed concern about the administration's use of the word «moonshot» to describe its anti-cancer campaign, saying it doesn't capture the difficult nature of the questions that need to be answered.

Short summary: Led by Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, scientists conducted a collaborative study that answered foundational questions about how nature influences the composition of aerosols.

Researchers hope these observations will answer fundamental questions about the nature of dark energy — including its effect on the evolution of the universe — and about the prevalence and formation of Earth - like planets in other solar systems.

It's human nature to crave answers about the future, seek an ongoing sense of security, and look for confirmation that life goes on after death.

My dad wasn't happy about it, but I knew I needed answers to all my questions about human nature, the mind, and relationships with myself and others.

-- Golden seal (Nature's Answer) drops use both internally (about 20 drops 3 times a day between meals with water) and externally (place 1 drop to inflamed ear every hour or at least 3 - 5 times a day).

Nature's Answer Chamomile comes with a dropper that I let fill just about all the way up and I dispense the entire amount directly into my mouth.