Collin — here's a great article on Daniel Dennett's research into «the self - sustaining
nature of cultural phenomena»
Not exact matches
Our Road from Regensburg column and lead letter show how in the abuse crisis the permissive media have thrown their significant
cultural power behind the idea that there is an intrinsic link between the
phenomenon of priestly abuse and the
nature of the Church.
The extraordinary
phenomenon of the sustained birth
of modern science in Western culture, however, is linked with meticulous investigation to the
cultural influence
of monotheism and the Christian doctrine
of creation exnihilo - a doctrine which both upheld the contingent, linear development
of creation and its rationality through the existence
of the physical laws
of nature, or «secondary causes», without thereby undermining God's omnipotence.
Featuring an incredible senstation
of scale, a solid, thought - provoking story on
nature and genetics, a raoring score from Sir John Willaims, and some
of the most cutting edge visual effects
of all time, the movie was a
cultural phenomenon that got the entire world talking about dinosaurs again.
My point was that, if we accept this basic story (it's too simple, even as an account
of how
cultural cognition works; but that's in the
nature of «models» & should give us pause only when the simplification detracts from rather than enhances our ability to predict and manage the dynamics
of the
phenomenon in question), then there's no reason to view the valences
of the
cultural meanings attached to crediting climate change risk as fixed or immutable.