We evaluate the rates and
nature of false positives in the CoRoT exoplanets search and compare our results with semiempirical predictions.
Not exact matches
Results from these tests provide also in many cases insights into the
nature of the sources
of the
false positives, which are generally produced by one
of several kinds
of configurations involving eclipsing binaries (EB).
Because
of these
false positives, a sequence
of tests - as originally outlined by Alonso et al. (2004)- is employed, beginning with detailed revisions
of the detection light - curves, and continuing for surviving candidates with follow - up observations, to either reject them from the list
of planetary candidates or to verify their planetary
nature.
Giant transiting exoplanets are easily mimicked by
false positives, so spectroscopic follow - up observations are needed to establish the planetary
nature of the transit detections, and easily reveal blended multiple stellar systems.
«Furthermore, contrary to the blatantly
false contention
of the United States Environmental Protection Agency and others, CO2 is not a pollutant; it is a pollution fighter that reduces the negative effects
of true pollutants, such as ozone, and replaces them with
positive effects that are
of great worth to man and
nature alike.»