Sentences with phrase «nature of going to court»

With a mediator, a couple can reach an agreement without the adversarial nature of going to court.

Many couples in Indiana try to come to their own agreement for the terms of the divorce in order to avoid the time, costs and unpredictable nature of going to court.

Not exact matches

By 2001, the five growers who had been sued went to the U.S. Federal District Court of Maryland with the defense that questioned: «Can a plant long well known in nature and cultivated and eaten by humans for decades, be patented merely on the basis of recent realization that the plant has always had some heretofore unknown but naturally occurring beneficial feature?»

«Ecojustice goes to court and uses the power of the law to defend nature, slow climate change, and stand up for the health of our communities.

Looking back in an interview with the First Amendment Center, John R. Bates, the plaintiff in the Supreme Court case that opened the door to attorney advertsing, says: «It is the nature of the First Amendment that there is going to be speech in every medium of communication that some people don't like.»

Having considered the nature of the court's discretionary power, the judge went on to consider the circumstances in which that power should be exercised and, again, the judgment of HHJ Pelling QC provided some assistance.

The history of this structure goes back to the British Mandate, when the British did not want complaints of this nature brought to the lower courts, which were staffed by Arabs and / or Jews, and instead staffed this court by judges brought for short terms from Britain.

The court explained that the city would not need to go as far as to show that it knew of the specific hole and decided not to fill it, but more was necessary than what was shown in this case to prove that the alleged act or omission was discretionary in nature.

It noted that most «courts have had no difficulty to decide that the choice of a lifestyle... or the consumption of a product... [and that] rights that are essentially economic in nature... can not be compared to issues that involve» choices that go to the core of enjoying «individual dignity and independence.»

Given the general nature of the high court's analysis in Childs, it is reasonable to expect the rule in Hamilton and Wardak would apply to the consumption of marijuana going forward as well.

Even if one could say that such treatment reflects some policy of the various foreign states involved, or indeed of the United Kingdom, it goes far beyond any conduct previously recognised as requiring judicial abstention... The critical point in my view is the nature and seriousness of the misconduct alleged in both cases before the Supreme Court, at however high a level it may have been authorised... Sovereign states who without justification and without permitting access to justice detain or mistreat individuals in the course or in relation to their conduct of foreign relations or affairs have sovereign immunity in foreign domestic courts.

While the General Court concludes that the Council was too quick in refusing access to parts of the requested documents, it did not go along with Besselink's claim to the exceptional, constitutionally significant nature of the requested documents.

The English court seems to have gone to some lengths to explore the nature and incidence of privilege generally, as Canadian courts have done from time to time on solicitor - client privilege, and litigation privilege.

He maintains that such technologies will change the nature of litigation as it will increase the likelihood of settlement, while the likelihood of cases going to court will fall, «save perhaps for the most ambiguous,» where further legal development will be most valuable.

The court went on to confirm that the character of employment «refers to the nature of the position that has been held by the employee — the level of responsibility, expertise and so on.»

Martin's conclusion, although of a warning nature, does not go the next step, and really negatively comment on OREA's abject failure to produce a document (the SPIS) that is clear, concise, and routinely defensible in a court room, thereby fulfilling the purpose for which it was ostensibly intended, keeping sellers / buyers «out» of the courtroom.

When a matter goes to Court, the Courts will decide what the actual nature of the Working Relationship was, based on what actually transpired between the Seller and the Listing REALTOR / Brokerage and not what they agreed to in writing, as to what the nature of the Agency Relationship would be!