The quest for this intensified reality led the Greeks to seek to override, so to speak, the pictorial
nature of human vision itself in their sculptural creations.
Not exact matches
This not only helps to explain religion's primordial, irrepressible, widespread, and seemingly inextinguishable character in the
human experience, it also suggests that the skeptical Enlightenment, secular humanist, and New Atheist
visions for a totally secular
human world are simply not realistic — they are cutting against a very strong grain in the
nature of reality's structure and so will fail to achieve their purpose.
A hallmark
of the Catholic tradition is that God's existence (though not His Trinitarian
nature), the existence
of the incorporeal soul (though not the
nature of the after life and the beatific
vision), the
nature of the
human person (though not the full truth about the indwelling
of grace), and the natural law are all accessible to us without divine Revelation.
First, since process thought concerns itself with the totality
of human experience, it must necessarily take very seriously the fact
of the religious
vision and the claim
of countless millions
of people
of every race and nation and age to have enjoyed some kind
of contact with a reality greater than humankind or
nature, through which refreshment and companionship have been given.
What America needs is not therapy for a poor white version
of Psychological Man but a renewed
vision of the common good built on a renewed understanding
of a common
human nature.
It is important to note that Williams» variety
of sacramentalism is oriented to
nature, not to
human beings; to
vision, not to hearing; to space, not to time; and magic is the key to transformation, not dramatic growth.
Pope Benedict highlights the inherent freedom and relationality
of human nature to underpin a renewed social
vision of Man in Christ.
The philosopher who did most to shape this
vision of the world, Rene Descartes, regarded the
human mind as wholly different in
nature.
The question
of the
nature of such
visions is more difficult, for it involves criteria by which
visions are to be distinguished from invented ones or those due to mere subjective
human conditions.
The reason for this flexibility
of method is not a desire to be «liberal» either in the sense
of an optimistic
vision of human nature in general or in the more restrictive methodological sense
of being optimistic about the power
of one's critical tools.
The biblical understanding
of nature, therefore, inheres in a
human ethical
vision, a
vision of ecojustice, in which the enmity or harmony
of nature with humanity is part
of the
human historical drama
of good and evil.
Also in the face
of the ecological disaster created by the modern ideas
of total separation
of humans from
nature and
of the unlimited technological exploitation
of nature, it is proper for primal
vision to demand, not an undifferentiated unity
of God, humanity and
nature or to go back to the traditional worship
of nature - spirits, but to seek a spiritual framework
of unity in which differentiation may go along with a relation
of responsible participatory interaction between them, enabling the development
of human community in accordance with the Divine purpose and with reverence for the community
of life on earth and in harmony with
nature's cycles to sustain and renew all life continuously.
The biblical understanding
of nature inheres in a
human ethical
vision, a
vision of ecojustice, in which the enmity or harmony
of nature with humanity is part
of the
human historical drama
of good and evil.
Would we have to be a Jew or a Christian in order to understand the
vision of human nature and society which was being communicated there?
But we shall not really «see» the Kingdom
of God in these everyday miracles
of nature and
human life unless we look and look again, and not only look, but mark the spot at which the
vision came to us, that we may know where it will repay us to make further explorations.164
Ward examines this question in chapter 8, where he points out that in Judaism and Christianity morality is inspired by a
vision of a God
of supreme goodness, whose
nature is meant to be reflected in
human society, and whose final goal is «the transfiguration
of the cosmos by a fully realised personal unity with God».
Back in the early seventeenth century Francis Bacon, the first modern philosopher
of science, recognised that the developmental
nature of modern scientific methodology provided a truer
vision of how
human knowing arrives at formality than the scholastic theory
of abstraction.
Out
of this movement, a
vision of the cosmos is emerging that is at once more purposeful, more respectful
of the mysteries
of nature, and more cognizant
of the limitations
of the
human mind in attempting to comprehend it.
Liberal Christianity shared that
vision, sometimes qualifying it with a more realistic appraisal
of human nature, sometimes exaggerating its romantic hopes.
A more beautiful
vision To found inter-faith dialogue upon a
human nature which is profoundly fulfilled by obeying commands
of God, which, moreover, are universal norms, is (again) to play more on the ground
of traditional Christianity.
But today we need new
visions of a perfected social order, a planetary society in which all men have equal access to the means
of human fulfillment in a world brotherhood at peace with
nature and with God.
We need a
vision whereby the very identity
of Christ, in his
human and divine
natures, as the physical and spiritual centre and fulfilment
of creation, is the basis
of his active redemption
of us since sin.
But it does seem clear to me that we need to begin with a
vision of a world community (1) consisting
of a population within the biological carrying capacity
of the planet (2) organized politically and economically in ways that provide to all
human beings equal access to the means
of material fulfillment and (3) organized technologically in ways that (4) neither exhaust essential natural resources
of earth nor (5) upset the delicate balances
of nature which make the environment capable
of supporting life.
As the
human nature of Christ is the perfect image, in the Son
of Man,
of our own identity and holiness, our wholeness in body and soul through God, so in the order
of the spiritual soul, the Divine Being itself, as pure and perfect spirit, is the mirror image
of our spiritual perfection, now and unto the beatific
vision.
John Paul IPs own writings did much to develop a new «personalist»
vision of Catholic moral, spiritual and social teaching, although not perhaps a clear anthropology or philosophy
of human nature as body and soul.
Nevertheless, the disturbance arises from an essentially Christian
vision of human nature and the
human condition that, while affirming their reconciliation in God, acknowledges the tension between justice and mercy in this world.
It is clear that our hostility to
nature flows partly from a
vision of the cosmos in which we
humans are only accidentally present and essentially absent.
This
vision of Catholicism as the spiritual core
of human civilization remains incontrovertible, theologically speaking, because the grace
of Christ heals and elevates
human nature in a unique and perfect way.
Martin also asks some telling questions about Rahner's remarkably optimistic
vision of human nature — an optimism all the more astonishing since, as Martin notes, he spent almost his entire priestly life (1932 — 84) first under Nazi rule and then, after the Second World War, with half
of Germany under Soviet Communism.
My thesis is that the many
visions of perfection are more or less the same or at least analogical, and therefore if each Faith keeps its ethics
of law dynamic within the framework
of and in tension with its own transcendent
vision of perfection, the different religious and secular Faiths can have a fruitful dialogue at depth on the
nature of human alienation which makes love impossible and for updating our various approaches to personal and public law with greater realism with insights from each other.
If each Faith keeps its ethics
of law dynamic within the framework
of and in tension with its own transcendent
vision of perfection, the different religious and secular Faiths can have a fruitful dialogue on the
nature of human alienation which makes love impossible and for updating our various approaches to personal and public law with greater realism with insights from each other.
And in light
of liberalism's faltering, we might ask whether Berlin's
vision of autonomy really reflects what is essential to
human nature.
The religious
visions of mankind have usually pointed toward something or someone that saves the world
of nature and
of human experience from vanishing into a total nothingness.
My break had also, and more profoundly, to do with fundamental understanding
of human nature, and with the relationship
of that understanding to the socialist
vision.
If grace perfects through
human nature, then the enormity
of the
vision of God given to Paul comes to him piecemeal as he struggles to live his new life fully.
Given that St. Thomas» theological project is both materially and intentionally open ended, and given that the Magisterium recognises that philosophy must take adequate account
of the advances
of modern science, if one could demonstrate that the perspective proposed by Holloway and now by Faith movement and magazine fulfilled all
of the criteria mentioned above - i.e. it is a unified
vision of the Catholic faith that gives due place to the role
of human reason without blurring the distinction between
nature and grace and one that presents our revealed faith uncompromisingly and in its entirety - one could justifiably claim that the Faith
vision is totally coherent with, if not the total content
of St. Thomas» theology, then most certainly the aims and intentionsset out in Aeterni Patris.
Brexit has elevated an atomistic
vision of human nature fixated on sovereignty and the fear
of the other — which can only be embodied in moral individuation and isolation.
This kind
of interdisciplinary engagement may also have the side benefit
of heightening the theorist's reflective awareness
of the underlying sociological assumptions — about power,
human nature, the main tendencies
of social life and so on — that s / he inevitably makes in constructing a political
vision of how the world ought to be.
Human nature is weak for instant gratification and therefore often
visions of tomorrow's success are not sufficient to get you through the drudgery
of today.
Emiliano Rocha Minter's claustrophobic
vision of a post-apocalyptic Mexico City finds a pair
of teenage siblings coming under the sway
of a man who views the collapse
of society as a call for
humans to embrace their carnal
nature and shatter every taboo, starting with the obvious one between brothers and sisters.
Despite the specific
nature of the character Stiller plays, «Brad's Status» finds a universality in the uncomfortable truths it explores: the
human tendency to take stock, especially around middle age, and to compare our lives against both our friends» achievements and our youthful
visions of our future selves.
Critics may carp about his sour
vision of human nature, but he keeps plugging away at his micro-studies
of the cruel struggle for interpersonal domination.
All sections
of society must thrive to converge upon their
visions and convictions and find common ground for collective action that can bring about the transformation required to ensure the wellbeing
of all on the planet —
humans as well as
nature.
A radically different
vision of human well - being is the call; one that is in tune with
nature and respects other species, promotes socio - economic equity amongst all people, enhances the cultural, material, economic, social, and political opportunities for all, empowers each person and community to take part in decision - making affecting their lives, even as it leaves the natural world a better and much improved place.
In this context, a radically different
vision of human well - being, one that is in tune with
nature and respects other species, promotes socio - economic equity amongst all people, enhances the cultural, material, economic, social, and political opportunities for all, and one that empowers each person and community to take part in decision - making affecting their lives.
They add up to a new view
of human nature and a new
vision of how people succeed.
First time visitors may want to begin with the Explore section where they will find interactive exhibits that look at Leonardo da Vincis work on the forces
of nature, the
human body, light and
vision, and the natural world and learn how these things are all interconnected according to da Vinci.
I am very grateful for this opportunity to share that experience with you, combined with my
vision of yoga as it was developed over 5,000 years ago — yoga practiced in astounding beauty, in the natural environment with all its elements, as a means for
humans to come to realize their true selves and
nature and place within the infinite universe.
«El Gigante» relates the clash between two opposed
visions of life: one that pursues unlimited economic growth and uses
human beings and
nature for a system that has already entered crisis; and one that tries to make rational and balanced use
of resources and to live in harmony with a given territory.
Some landscape painters convey reality in compellingly quotidian detail, reflecting or critiquing the complex relationship between
humans and
nature; others construct neo-byzantine
visions of the future that may thrill or terrify; some work intuitively to give form to the ephemeral, conveying that which can not be spoken; and many bend or break accepted rules
of vision, reminding us that perception itself is both a privilege and a discipline.