If you wish standardized tests to be «absolutely trustworthy» you do not understand
the nature of standardized tests or accurate procedures for evaluation of student achievement.
My top priorities during the most recent iteration of the bill have been: • Reducing the high - stakes
nature of standardized tests by basing accountability on multiple measures of a school's effectiveness.
Uncomfortable questions about
the nature of standardized testing, school goals, and leadership may arise.
Not exact matches
Finally, the researchers examined correlations among the
nature of classroom assignments, the quality
of student work, and scores on
standardized tests.
And while some see portfolios as excellent qualitative measures instead
of standardized tests, we know that the subjective
nature of portfolio assessment can make it an unreliable comparison between schools.
One
of the biggest complaints about NCLB was the
test - and - punish
nature of the law — the high - stakes consequences attached to student
standardized test scores.
Though course work and grades matter for students» academic trajectories, the subjective
nature of course grading suggests that
standardized tests may be a better measure
of the impact
of double - dosing on math skill.
The teacher is still the best assessment tool because classroom assessments are formative (immediate) in
nature, and over time they provide a cumulative, running record
of achievement that is more reliable than any
standardized test.
As educators, we realize that the quality
of a child's education can not be measured solely by scores on
standardized reading and math
tests, which by their
nature do not assess students» conceptual thinking, their ability to do research and to evaluate and defend ideas, their skill at written and oral expression, or their success in collaborative or teamwork settings.
The destructive
nature of including
standardized testing data in teacher evaluation is discussed above.
Standardized reading
tests, by their
nature, don't
test any particular body
of knowledge.
Even more astounding, despite the self - selecting and exclusive
nature of charters, researcher Myron Orfield found that Chicago's public schools outperform charters on
standardized test passing and growth rates in both reading and math, and high school graduation rates.
Much
of the criticism
of the Bush - era No Child Left Behind law was that its over reliance on
standardized assessments — and the subsequent pressure it put on teachers due to its punitive
nature — encouraged educators to «teach to the
test» at the expense
of actual learning.
And on the formative
nature of such
tests, as it was then: «Teachers rarely consult
standardized test results except, perhaps, for initial grouping or placement
of students, and they believe that the
tests are
of more value to school or district administrators than to themselves.»
Facing push back from teachers and parents about the pace and
nature of education reforms, Governor Malloy was forced to call for a «slow down» in the pace
of reforms, especially tying teacher evaluations to
standardized test results.
This new award - winning documentary reveals the stark contrasts between America's obsession with
standardized tests, at the cost
of everything else, and Scandinavia's embrace
of all things
nature - based.