Sentences with phrase «nature of the scheme»

But you now see that the Irresistible and the Indisputable are the two weapons which the very nature of His scheme forbids Him to use.

He said: «Persimmon's success as a business and the uncapped nature of the scheme has meant that the value of these awards has become very large.»

the Irresistible and the Indisputable are the two weapons which the very nature of His scheme forbids Him to use.

I am glad to him going to prison, though it seems a light sentence considering the breach of trust and corrupt nature of a scheme concocted and run by one of NY's highest elected officials.

But prosecutor Thomas McKay argued the «brazen» nature of the schemes — Adam Skelos blew off work at the insurer, which needed regular legislation from the Senate — was what persuaded jurors, along with testimony from cooperating witnesses who said they were buying Skelos» vote.

All the mutual funds are requiredto label their schemes on the following parameters: a. Nature of scheme such as to create wealth or provide regular income in an indicative timhorizon (short / medium / long term).

The responsible entity of the mortgage scheme should describe the nature of the scheme's investment portfolio, including:

As such, the criticism that it is sufficient to identify some factors hinting at the «loyalty - inducing» nature of the scheme to establish a prima facie violation of Article 102 TFEU (see here and here at p. 15) was legitimate.

As regards the criteria and rules governing the grant of the rebates, the Court held that the retroactive nature of the scheme in conjunction with the annual reference period, which was regarded as a relatively long reference period, could produce the so - called «suction effect» (paras 32 - 35).

The legislation has since changed, as explained below, but many of the Tribunal's comments (especially on the nature of a scheme administrator's power to decide to whom to distribute death benefits) are particularly relevant to the current legal position.

Utilising stripy fabric in ice cream - inspired colours to upholster the headboard, dress the bed and frame the window, reinforces the relaxed nature of the scheme.

Not exact matches

Most of Bitcoin's supporters, meanwhile, seem to be hackers whose resources depend upon the Ponzi - scheme nature of the enterprise itself.

The widely unregulated nature of ICOs has, however, led to a notable number of fraudulent or misleading investment schemes, leading regulators in countries like China and South Korea to ban or strongly curtail the instruments.

Query whether the crypto hedge funds or VCs who are investing in this stuff would qualify depending on the exact nature of their businesses and involvement in a given scheme.

His psychologism reorients the search for guidance away from reason toward human nature itself and therefore favors widely distributed and long - established practices over novel schemes of improvement.

Hence, the suggestions that arise from the application of the general scheme of thought to this special question of the nature of God may be weakened or may gain cogency according to the reading of these great intuitions of the race by which men live.

We have also indicated the nature of the solutions arrived at by Hegel in terms of that scheme.

As a science - fiction reader I am always amazed that some people will say that a book brings into focus human nature and future trends and a possible scheme for the salvation of the human race from our own self - destructiveness.

Mays takes the statement that «The order of nature, prevalent in the cosmic epoch in question, exhibits itself as a morphological scheme involving eternal objects of the objective species» (PR 447f) and renders it: The order of nature is a morphological scheme of mathematical Platonic forms (PW 58/56).

The abstractness of information is something which, by its very nature, carries us outside the scheme of history.

In light of Mays's remarks it is astonishing to find that he devotes a mere ten pages to the method of extensive abstraction (PW 109-18/115 -25), and these do not begin to offer any clarification of the exact nature of this metaphysical scheme.

The elaborate scheme by which Whitehead relates the Primordial Nature to God's working in the world via subjective aims (PR 523 - 27) is ignored by Mays as he recognizes no difference in the Primordial Nature as «the ordering entity in nature» and «the order of nature» (PW 5Nature to God's working in the world via subjective aims (PR 523 - 27) is ignored by Mays as he recognizes no difference in the Primordial Nature as «the ordering entity in nature» and «the order of nature» (PW 5Nature as «the ordering entity in nature» and «the order of nature» (PW 5nature» and «the order of nature» (PW 5nature» (PW 58/56).

The quantitative aspect of intensity, whereby pattern is the primitive feature of existents, receives elaboration in regard to perception by Alexander and Bergson, in a manner that may certainly have influenced Whitehead, inspiring him at the same time to devise a revisionist scheme in which unnecessary distinctions between quantitative and qualitative patterns could be maintained by a firmer metaphysical grasp of the nature of intensity per se (particularly its ontological rescuability from infection by the notion of measurable extensive quanta).24

McHenry sees the «concrete experience» on which the scheme is to be founded, as Whitehead does in Process and Reality, as referring to the units of nature as they are in themselves.

By approaching the problem from this more critical stance it may be hoped that a less subjectivist, more balanced account of the place of mind and nature in the general scheme of things will result.

By characterizing nature as the other of spirit Hegel does manage to assign nature a significant role in the general scheme of things, one which manages to leave nature and all its particularity fully intact.

In framing the relationship between nature and mind in this way we can, claims Hegel, arrive at an understanding of the place of nature in the general scheme of things, which at the same time leaves nature as it is.

Thus whereas in the first case there is a general failing to give nature, as the realm of finitude, contingency, chance and decay, its due place as a condition of mind as well as a constitutive element in the general scheme of things, in the second case there is an equally important failure to account for the origins of the unity of rational mind in nature.

And while it is true that such an approach does offer a more «down to earth» understanding of the relation of mind to nature, here there is a seemingly equal tendency to assign too great a role to the place of nature in the general scheme of things, resulting in the general devaluation of reason or mind.

Whereas Hegel may be said to exemplify the tendency to assign too great a role to mind in the general scheme of things, it is Nietzsche who perhaps best represents the opposite or contrary tendency, namely that of assigning too great a place to nature over mind.

While it is true that Nietzsche's work does much to restore the place of nature in the general scheme of things, it must also be said that by placing mind in a subordinate relation to a purely irrational natural world he ends up devaluing the rational character of mind in a way that is equally questionable as the idealism he was reacting against.

The problem of the nature of the self is not the same as the problem of understanding the whole person (man as a living organism) in Whitehead's scheme.

No simple scheme is adequate.2 Niebuhr tried to do justice to both aspects of the self by showing that nature and spirit form the double environment in which man lives.

From its instinctively cooperative origins in human nature to the self - initiated perfection of its civilized enterprises, a civilized society is, in Whitehead's metaphysical scheme, a community of social beings who belong to one another essentially.

Nature is in fact always much richer and more complex than our imaginative and mathematical models, and we unduly shrivel our understanding of the cosmos if we equate it in a simple way with our scientific schemes.

Rorty, who refers to this scheme as the «mirror of nature» or «foundationalism,» criticizes it from within the tradition of professional philosophy.

The primordial nature is God's mentality, and in Whitehead's scheme mentality is not, of its own nature, spatio - temporal in character.

The intimate link between the works on nature and the works on metaphysics is precisely what we should expect given that (2) Whitehead's basic scheme of metaphysical ideas had been in his mind for quite a long time before he moved to Harvard in 1924.

(In this respect, Whitehead's God is no better off than Hartshorne's, unless Lewis Ford can make out his case for a greater status for God's primordial nature antecedent to the creation of the metaphysical categories or categoreal scheme [cf. 1 and 2].)

Adequately to comprehend the changed present - day situation and especially the necessity of a new conception of nature for science, we must have clearly in mind the scheme of concepts in terms of which nature had been understood.

The reality of death as a fact: the inescapable element of decision and the consequences in searching appraisal: the social or communal nature of human existence, coupled with the honest recognition that no man is in and of himself a perfect agent of the purpose of God and the love of God: the joy of fulfillment with one's brethren in the imperishable reality of God: and the terrible character of evil — these were values which the older scheme somehow affirmed and expressed.

There is, of course, some comfort to be derived from the thought that everything that occurs at the level of what Aquinas calls secondary causality» in nature or history» is governed not only by a transcendent providence, but by a universal teleology that makes every instance of pain and loss an indispensable moment in a grand scheme whose ultimate synthesis will justify all things.

Thus, nature turns out to be a matrix of internal relations between interdependent relata rather than the scheme of external relations germane to the mechanist view.

There is, however, no real contradiction here because Whiteheads concept of nature has nothing in common with that attacked by Merleau - Ponty — the mechanist view expressed by Descartes — and, consequently, Whitehead's notions of «object» and «causality» are altogether different from their counterparts in the mechanist scheme.

The first of our two schemes is framed in terms of the hierarchical structure of nature and the second in terms of aesthetic experience.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

There are two reasons for the «day late» nature of my match report for Arsenal v Chelsea: the first being the need for a day to ponder of the importance of the result in the grand scheme of things.

Last year scientists writing in the journal Nature Climate Change suggested cutting methane emissions by pushing up the price of meat through a tax or emissions trading scheme.

Because what the SNP is plotting and scheming behind the doors of St Andrew's House is to change the very nature — the very fabric — of our country.

According to the indictment, Silver attempted to hide his fraudulent scheme by lying publicly about the nature of his work, claiming that none of his clients had business before the state when he was in fact successfully being lobbied on state real estate laws by Glenwood Management.