If political life itself is a struggle with reality, interpretation, appraisal, and appreciation of values, as I believe it is, and if truth is the connection between reality and interpretation, then the problematic
nature of truth lies at the center of our time's travails with distributive justice, with the balance of nature, and with peace.
Not exact matches
The atheist who claims to come from a «faith» background is extremely confused and more to be pitied than admired.Had the supposed «believer» continued in the «faith» they claim to have forsaken, they would ultimately have appeared before God and been rejected.These were deceived, they never met God, they never knew God and they never understood God.They are devoid
of the
Truth and twice lost.There is hope while they still breathe Gods gift
of life that they might someday meet and be reconciled to God, but their
lying nature makes salvation less likely.Debate with them is an exercise in futility.God bless
This self love is sin.God never forced chaos on us.we gave in to satan's
lies about evil being an inherent necessity.Jesus said he was the way, the
truth and life.He was the life (love) that everyone craves for, he is the
truth which meant that his love was our only need and he exposed the
lies of satan that we could attain bliss on subordinating people to our cravings.Sinning people don't accept a God who requires us to renounce ourselves because they are not convinced
of God's love being enough for them and they are afraid to destroy their identity and live for the Glory
of God.So, upon death, these souls realize that the physical world was just a shadow
of God's love (the
nature, food etc) and their own
lies (violence, self love etc) and realize that love is their only need.They pursue it from other soul beings but are hurt that there's only hate and self love.They are afraid to approach the light because they don't want to renounce their identity as they have not recognized God's love before.
First, Pannenberg's central significance
lies in his understanding
of the
nature of theology and the
nature of truth to which theology is related.
The human person is, first and foremost, rational in
nature, and fulfillment
lies in fuller knowledge (plus,
of course, the love that is merited by every
truth one appropriates).
The key to human
nature therefore
lies in both the organic inheritance
of evolution through the brain, which is instinct with natural law, harmonic order and finely tuned mutual balance, and in the free, dynamic seeking
of truth and values and their free administration by the directly created spirit.
It
lies in the very
nature of Christian faith to claim for itself — or for its Lord — the whole
truth about man's existence before God.
It is his
nature to
lie because there is no
truth in him, and with a web
of untruth he ensnares the world.
As the group
of scientists led by Prof. Dr. Reinhard Dörner and his graduate student Jörg Voigtsberger report in the current edition
of the journal
Nature Communications, using the COLTRIMS reaction microscope, they were able to demonstrate that the
truth lies somewhere in between.
That's why we decided to write and publish the exclusive e-Book, The Coconut Oil Secret:
Nature's # 1 Best Healing Superfood - so you too could separate the
truth from the
lies and experience the world
of health that coconut oil offers!
- The Irish Mail on Sunday «Scathingly funny... Also a profound and thought - provoking novel that explores the
nature of truth,
lies, and fiction.»
Where the power
lies is somewhere between the knowable
truth and the unknown chaos
of nature and time.
The Project's many elements underscore how the fluid
nature of information shapes our understanding
of reality and
truth, an exploration which
lies at the core
of Kaufman's artistic practice.
It may be summarised as
lying between those who, following Lord Justice Hoffmann in Muller v Linsley & Mortimer [1996] PNLR 74 think that the principle is by its
nature limited to protecting statements made without prejudice from being used as admissions
of the
truth of what is stated, and those who, following Lord Justice Robert Walker in Unilever plc v The Proctor & Gamble Co [2000] 1 WLR 2436, [2001] 1 All ER 783, think that the principle prevents the use
of statements made without prejudice for any purposes, subject to a non-exhaustive list
of recognised exceptions.
In the past, mentally challenged victims
of sexual offences have been frequently precluded from testifying, not on the ground that they could not relate what happened, but on the ground that they lacked the capacity to articulate in abstract terms the difference between the
truth and a
lie and the
nature of the obligation imposed by promising to tell the
truth.
We can't ask about the
nature of the promise, but can we ask you about «
truth» and «
lie»?