[Response: For anything
near present temperatures, WV increases at roughly 7 % per ºC and the feedback is tied to this — hence the size of the feedback doesn't vary a lot the absolute global mean temperature.
Not exact matches
Professor Drijfhout said: «The planet earth recovers from the AMOC collapse in about 40 years when global warming continues at
present - day rates, but
near the eastern boundary of the North Atlantic (including the British Isles) it takes more than a century before
temperature is back to normal.»
With an eye to the future — in terms of both energy costs and environmental considerations — the education authority opted for a system utilising the heat always
present at a more or less constant
temperature in the «
near - surface geothermal layer» underground.
My impression is that if you take North Atlantic
temperatures, detrend them, and call the remainder the
temperature signal of the AMO, then we are
near a positive peak at
present.
Finally, the presence of vigorous climate variability
presents significant challenges to
near - term climate prediction (25, 26), leaving open the possibility of steady or even declining global mean surface
temperatures over the next several decades that could
present a significant empirical obstacle to the implementation of policies directed at reducing greenhouse gas emissions (27).
But as illustrated in the figure below, simply extrapolating this correlation forward in time puts the Antarctic
temperature in the
near future somewhere upwards of 10 degrees Celsius warmer than
present — rather at the extreme end of the vast majority of projections (as we have discussed here).
If there happened to be a natural
temperature cycle which was at a minimum in 1861 and
near a maximum at
present, then plotting out
temperatures over this time period and drawing a straight line through them could give a misleading impression of the trend.
A sevenfold increase of the
present normal carbon dioxide concentration increases the
temperature near the ground by approximately one degree.
To be clear Bart, Mike, s paper was about the phase and amplitude of the AMO and, and by his understanding, this may be different than conventional understanding, and how this affects the
present temperature today as well as the
near future.
«Finally, the presence of vigorous climate variability
presents significant challenges to
near - term climate prediction (25, 26), leaving open the possibility of steady or even declining global mean surface
temperatures over the next several decades that could
present a significant empirical obstacle to the implemen - tation of policies directed at reducing greenhouse gas emissions (27).
We
present an analysis to illustrate why
temperature values at specific levels will depend on wind speed, and with the same boundary layer heat content change, trends in
temperature should be expected to be different at every height
near the surface when the winds are light, as well as different between light wind and stronger wind nights.
About 3 million years ago, during the mid-Pliocene warm period, global
temperatures were 2 ° — 3 ° warmer than
present, and polar ice extents were about one third smaller, making this period interesting as a comparison to the
near future.
We have two new entries to the long (and growing) list of papers appearing the in recent scientific literature that argue that the earth's climate sensitivity — the ultimate rise in the earth's average surface
temperature from a doubling of the atmospheric carbon dioxide content — is close to 2 °C, or
near the low end of the range of possible values
presented by the U.N.'s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).
The third
temperature proxy was based on a comparison of plant taxa
present at the site (Matthews and Ovenden, 1990) with
nearest living relatives and their climatic ranges.