Or we can understand that there is a 200 yr body of research that has been looked at, analysed, reviewed by scientists who have published with
near unanimous consensus that we are causing what is being observed.
Not exact matches
There is a
near -
unanimous consensus in the medical community that breast is best, with the World Health Organization (WHO) recommending that mothers exclusively breastfeed infants for a minimum of 6 months.
The debates on tobacco, MMR and WMD were very unbalanced but a popular
consensus has emerged that is as
near unanimous as can be expected on any complex issue.
In such a case it makes rather more sense to weight
near -
unanimous scientific
consensus positions than the weight assigned to some uncredentialed fringe or another.
Climate
Consensus and «Misinformation»: a Rejoinder to «Agnotology, Scientific
Consensus, and the Teaching and Learning of Climate Change» decisively rejects suggestions by Cook and others that those who say few scientists explicitly support the supposedly
near -
unanimous climate
consensus are misinforming and misleading the public.
«Such surveys are often cited as demonstrating a
near -
unanimous scientific
consensus in favor of a climate policy, when they never ask any question about whether and to what extent the anthropogenic component in recent warming might be dangerous or about whether a «climate policy» should be adopted in attempted mitigation of future warming.»
It is pointed out only on the basis of how strong the evidence is that it has reached a level of
near unanimous scientific agreement (just as a
consensus exists that gravity exists).
They found
near -
unanimous consensus (76/77) among the experts that there is no evidence to support the existence of SLAP.
For example, regarding the validity of the evidence that the basic greenhouse gas mechanism is causing recent global warming, there is
near -
unanimous scientific
consensus among the experts that have real climate credentials, are working in the field with a position in a recognized scientific department at a university or laboratory (not a right - wing think tank), and who publish in the peer - reviewed scientific literature (non-peer reviewed think tank papers don't count).