Sentences with phrase «necessarily do a thing for»

It won't necessarily do a thing for your blogging and social media presence but for your general state of mind it is wonderful.

Not exact matches

Not necessarily message them but a place for you to sort of browse and see among your matches who's available this week or who wants to go do this kind of thing.

«In reality, the majority of organizations don't necessarily understand exactly where their profits are coming from, where their key missions are being driven from, and the key things they would need to be able to do and in what timeframe if that was disrupted,» says Lyndon Bird, international technical director of the Caversham, England - based Business Continuity Institute, which provides business continuity certification and guidance for companies around the world.

And in preparing for and dealing with natural disasters, Moore recommends getting into a triage mindset — but not necessarily being beholden to the way things have been done in the past.

[For example, on my personal account] I am a lot more free and can post a lot more fun real - time things that are live, that I don't know that we necessarily want to live one forever on my Instagram feed and friends.

«That's not necessarily a bad thing — it can signal trust, for example, and we rely on other people to remember things for us all the time, or don't bother to memorize them because we know our spouses (or iPhones) are really good at remembering.»

People don't necessarily care that they aren't certain where things are going, but they know for sure that they don't want to go there alone.

«The approach at BuzzFeed is always try things out and see what happens, and after running a separate Canada office for awhile, it became clear that Canadians still liked the global stuff and didn't necessarily want just Canadian stuff,» Silverman said.

One thing to look at is that lower cost active funds could be helpful, otherwise the premiums you pay for active funds don't necessarily reflect the returns you'll get back.

«Although all of these things can put a strain on our budgets, they don't necessarily make it impossible to save for retirement.»

That is not a justifiable assumption: not necessarily because of the things to which we don't have access (other planets, for example), which should not be instructive either way; but because the fineness of our understanding of the things that we can observe is limited.

I think mary jane needs to be legalized not necessarily because of the hypocrisy and that we should have the «freedom» as much as the windfall of cash from growing it, selling it and taxing it, the medicinal properties it can be used for, the huge amount of space available in prisons that would open up and house criminals doing really bad things instead beng caught with a pound of a specific plant.

At the same time, he's saying we need to respect faith enough to understand that many people will rely solely on that for their views and we should accept that doing so is not necessarily a bad thing.

The intuition that reality for human beings, and indeed for all living things, is necessarily temporal, with an irreversible distinction between past, present, and future, is difficult to reconcile with the idea, long orthodox in the physics community, that time does not exist for subatomic particles or even for single atoms.

Furthermore, if the thing in question is not an absurdity, if it does not necessarily fail to exist, as, for example, a round square does, then it necessarily exists.

For example, God demands that we humans dutifully worship him / her — not because it's a natural thing for us to do (which it isn't) or because we necessarily want to do it (which most of us don't), but because God seemingly has a pathological, arrogant, egocentric need to be worshippFor example, God demands that we humans dutifully worship him / her — not because it's a natural thing for us to do (which it isn't) or because we necessarily want to do it (which most of us don't), but because God seemingly has a pathological, arrogant, egocentric need to be worshippfor us to do (which it isn't) or because we necessarily want to do it (which most of us don't), but because God seemingly has a pathological, arrogant, egocentric need to be worshipped.

For one thing, there is no real or ostensible connection between Whitehead's notion of God or religion and the symbols of the Christian tradition, although of course this does not mean that they are necessarily incompatible with one another.22 Whitehead does value religion, however, and does have a place for GFor one thing, there is no real or ostensible connection between Whitehead's notion of God or religion and the symbols of the Christian tradition, although of course this does not mean that they are necessarily incompatible with one another.22 Whitehead does value religion, however, and does have a place for Gfor God.

I know there is no recipe for these horrible mind things (been depressed myself so know full well how what works for one person doesn't necessarily work for another) but I was grasping at a straw when I asked you for some insight.

Sorry to put you on the spot, Ray, I know there is no recipe for these horrible mind things (been depressed myself so know full well how what works for one person doesn't necessarily work for another) but I was grasping at a straw when I asked you for some insight.

For myself, I do believe there are independent «things» which are'institution / s» which, if kept small and changed often, and devoid of power, are not necessarily a bad thing, but which, in the case of the church, has become far too large and been around in it's present form / s for far too long, with more power than is proper, and in many cases oppressing the people within its employ (not just those on the payroll but the volunteers as welFor myself, I do believe there are independent «things» which are'institution / s» which, if kept small and changed often, and devoid of power, are not necessarily a bad thing, but which, in the case of the church, has become far too large and been around in it's present form / s for far too long, with more power than is proper, and in many cases oppressing the people within its employ (not just those on the payroll but the volunteers as welfor far too long, with more power than is proper, and in many cases oppressing the people within its employ (not just those on the payroll but the volunteers as well).

You don't need a special diet necessarily to change things up — besides, it's just fun to freshen up the menu for Spring... especially when it's turning your old favourite Spaghetti and Meatballs into a fantastic Gluten - free Zucchini Pasta Spaghetti with No - Meat Balls!

This applies to electric pressure cookers more than stove - top... I think, but I use my electric pressure cooker to do many things — in the Summer — that are not necessarily time - saving, but to keep from adding heat to the kitchen: pasta for pasta salad is a big one as is potato salad.

When I cook, I don't necessarily look for unique ways of doing things because sometimes the old ways are the best ways with maybe just a little change here or there.

That doesn't necessarily answer the question, though, since you could say the same thing for just about any position you draft after the fourth round.

If I am looking (btw, as a psychologist) for factors that may predict a QB I don't want, I am looking for (not necessarily in this order): his athletic skills, his percentage completions, his arm, (basically QB tangibles) and then (maybe) the kinds of things that DO predict trouble later on, e.g. legal violations, drug use, steroid use, assaults, mistreatment of men and women, cheating in college, failure to attend meetings, classes, and practice, flagrant defiance of coaches» directionDO predict trouble later on, e.g. legal violations, drug use, steroid use, assaults, mistreatment of men and women, cheating in college, failure to attend meetings, classes, and practice, flagrant defiance of coaches» directions.

(I don't think changing the coach would necessarily improve things much but at least the fans could feel someone was being held accountable for the team's performance).

Don't think he necessarily has enough cachet, especially within the more progressive wings of the party (he can be hit from the left on things like abortion and race), but I could see him ending up as a running mate option for a more progressive candidate.

But getting a star just for the sake of doing it isn't necessarily a good thing.

I don't necessarily want to reignite the entire «Is the BBC a thing of the past for Juve?»

While I don't necessarily agree with everything he said — including calling «life - long commitment» the most important thing — I appreciate his assessment of how we often set ourselves up for misbehavior when we «do everything» for our partner (or never tell him «no»):

You don't necessarily need to pay an arm and a leg for one who specializes in maternity photography, just someone whose portfolio you like and who is willing to take your suggestions and try new things.

But most of the time if you're just doing these things that we're talking about and you probably wouldn't have a drastic plummet of milk supply, you would see a decrease and you could kind of, look, in my experience most women are able to kind of play with what works for them so, they're not necessarily having a low supply and then having a get it back up so they're more kind of playing with what works with their baby and their body

«It helps give my week structure, gets me out of the house, and forces me to focus on playing with baby for a set period of time, which I don't necessarily do if we're at home, when I'm also trying to clean or get other things done.»

We don't necessarily want to traumatize our kids by making them watch videos of babies from Third World countries starving to death, but we can challenge their assumptions about the things they take for granted.

And we all know like this parenting thing it is not a one size fits all and what works for you, does not necessarily works for me and I feel like that... usually when I am posting stuff on Facebook or people are asking for my opinion on stuff, that is usually how I phrase it... I actually had a twin mom yesterday reach out to me and it wasn't regarding breastfeeding but it was her babies kept hitting each other.

I relate in that books have definitely affected my own perspective about parenting and our home life as well... I am so very thankful for the vast amounts of info out there (even though no book is a «perfect fit» necessarily and I don't always agree / relate to every single thing!).

Some natural shampoos and body washes don't lather well or rinse easily because the chemicals that usually make those things happen aren't necessarily good for baby.

Wearing your baby in general though is one of those things that I would highly advocate just because I think that babies who are worn, they do tend to get on the breast a lot more frequently, they don't necessarily get on the breast for those long nice feedings that you have when you are lying down cozy with them.

Not necessarily in the sense of «non-artificial» but more in respect for this amazing thing my body was designed to do.

While this desire to do things over and over again is not necessarily thrilling for moms and dads, it is for their young children.

Criticising their partner for absolutely everything, even when things don't necessarily warrant criticism they criticise; your partner might just sit there a take it for the sake of your relationship, but for it kid, it's likely to provoke guilt and ultimately lead to the feeling of, «why bother?

This centuries - old party structure is not necessarily an unreasonable way to do things, but it is a slow and ineffectual organization for decisions that require innovation or rapid responses.

Equality did not solve things for many African Americans because formal legal parity doesn't necessarily mean parity in practice.

«There is all this anecdotal talk about pregnant women forgetting things, but that can occur in areas that don't necessarily have anything to do with caring for our offspring,» she says.

Isolating a gene that is «associated» with schizophrenia or is a «risk factor» for schizophrenia doesn't necessarily have a doggone thing to do with preventing it or curing it.

That's a surprisingly difficult thing to do, because the place where the mutant gene is different isn't necessarily the best place for a silencing drug to stick.

«We know that kind of environmental control for things like dust mites is marginally effective — and unfortunately the things that make a lot of common sense don't necessarily help.»

This isn't necessarily a bad thing, but the reality is, we just don't know for sure.

Now, this is not necessarily bad news as phytic acid (inositol hexaphosphate or IP6) can actually do great things for you — like prevent kidney stone formation — but it also inhibits the absorption of certain minerals, mostly the metals calcium, iron, magnesium and zinc.

I am definitely gonna do it, same for rice milk — i love all of them, but indeed the ones you can buy in the shop have too many things that you don't necessarily want Just one question: where can i buy nut bag / kaasdoek in Amsterdam / or Holland??? Any advice?