On
appeal to the Court of Appeal, the appellants argued that the motion judge had erred in several ways, namely by concluding that a broader claim was necessarily advantageous, and in turn assuming that the Rochon Group were better prepared and reso
appeal to the Court of
Appeal, the appellants argued that the motion judge had erred in several ways, namely by concluding that a broader claim was necessarily advantageous, and in turn assuming that the Rochon Group were better prepared and reso
Appeal, the appellants argued that the motion judge
had erred in several ways, namely by concluding that a
broader claim was
necessarily advantageous, and in turn assuming that the Rochon Group were better prepared and resourced.