Always bear in mind that cats are indeed hardier creatures in comparison to dogs and people, but just because they can get by more effectively under harsh circumstances, does not mean they we should
necessarily impose these conditions on them.
Imperial Cancer Research Fund v Ove Arup [2009] All ER (D) 282 (Jun); FG Hawkes v Beli Shipping [2009] All ER (D) 207 (Jul); and Sodastream v Coates [2009] All ER (D) 22 (Aug): while CPR 7.6 (2) does not
impose a threshold set of
conditions, nonetheless those requirements will always be relevant to the exercise of discretion on such an application, but the fact that the
conditions are not satisfied is not
necessarily determinative of the outcome of a CPR 7.6 (2) application; whether the claim has become statute barred since the date on which the claim form was issued is a matter of considerable importance, since a time extension would disturb the entitlement of the potential defendant to be free of the possibility of any claim; whether the claimant was reliant on further information which had not yet been forthcoming so as to determine whether or not a viable claim existed, is a relevant consideration.