Sentences with phrase «necessarily mean climate»

This does not necessarily mean the climate alarmists are wrong; it means that they should have humility and be open to the very cogent middle - ground of «lukewarming» — and the positive side of man - made warming, CO2 fertilization, and fossil - fuel appreciation.

While the weather fluctuates, that does not necessarily mean the climate is changing.

«High latitude places often have late climate departures, but that does not necessarily mean climate change won't impact those places,» Mora said.

Not exact matches

The interviewer asks if this wouldn't make us less than human, which was the question we would have asked, and Vatinno answers: «Becoming less human is not necessarily a negative thing, because it could mean we are less subject to the whims of nature, such as illness or climate extremes.»

«Results from this study are based on current climate projections, and it doesn't necessarily mean that lesser prairie - chickens will experience a population decline,» said Blake Grisham, Texas Tech University scientist and lead author of the study.

This does not necessarily mean the mechanisms driving precipitation changes in climate models are wrong.

Bromwich said the disagreement between climate model predictions and the snowfall and temperature records doesn't necessarily mean that the models are wrong.

Pilot study focusing on a region vulnerable to climate change Although the study highlights that long term changes in rainfall intensity are not always» man - made,» it does not necessarily mean that today's weather anomalies across the Indian Ocean rim countries and, in particular, their frequency, are not subject to human influence.

I know that they are trendy (which is not necessarily important, it just means that there will be many to choose from) and in certain climates they are practical... but still.

Reform Means More Than Just Small Research has shown that smaller schools are more effective at meeting students» needs, but just breaking up a school into smaller parts does not necessarily change the climate, according to Indiana University researcher Thomas Gregory.

And what would such actions mean in terms of adapting to, and mitigating to the extent still possible, climate change and other forms of environmental degradation, bearing in mind that such actions are necessarily international in scope?

Extremes of climate cover a wide range of issues — but don't necessarily mean that variance is significantly higher.

Paul, for clarification of my comment (15) on before G.W. Bush took office in 2001,... I meant as a whole (5,000 managers and staff) that NWS contributed in large ways to public misunderstanding on climate change and global warming, not necessarily 5,000 individuals.

I think you would be wise to accept that «the climate» of a system is widely used to mean the long - term statistics, and this meaning can be applied to essentially any system, not necessarily the full «climate system» of the IPCC.

When looking at climate data, the PCs may each have a distinct physical meaning, but not necessarily.]

Janković and Shultz even dare to reference the late Dr. Stephen Schneider's heartfelt rationalization for climate change advocacy by invoking his stated position that climate scientists must necessarily «offer up scary scenarios, make simplified, dramatic statements, and make little mention of any doubts we might have» so as to «capture the public's imagination» by «getting loads of media coverage» as a means to advance the cause.

Two years ago the fecal stain method identified several large, hitherto unknown colonies and nearly doubled our estimate of the world's Emperor Penguins.1, 2 That didn't mean climate change had necessarily increased penguin numbers, but a larger more robust population meant Emperor Penguins were far more resilient to any form of change.

It puts them in the path of hurricanes, in areas prone to flooding, drought, and famine, because the idea that people should live within natural limits necessarily means that people will suffer the fluctuations of climate.

Combined with the multiple dimensions of multiyear droughts and the specter of climate change, this means future droughts may well break records in ever new ways and not necessarily be managed better than past ones.»

It's not name calling, neither does it mean that all climate science rejectionists are necessarily creationists.

Nine global vegetation models (GVMs)(meaning vegetation processes are simulated, but not necessarily vegetation dynamics), four of which were DGVMs, were used in the Coupled Climate — Carbon Cycle Model Intercomparison Project (3).

(When reading the WUWT article, remember that a statistically - significant warming trend does not necessarily mean that it is a climate - significant trend.)

A sentence in Chapter 13 of the 2007 IPCC Fourth Assessment Report on Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability states: «Up to 40 percent of the Amazonian forests could react drastically to even a slight reduction in precipitation; this means that the tropical vegetation, hydrology and climate system in South America could change very rapidly to another steady state, not necessarily producing gradual changes between the current and the future situation.»

«Since geoengineering would not affect the climate the same way [as mitigation], a lower global mean temperature anomaly achieved using geoengineering does not necessarily lead to lower aggregate climate risks.

For an equilibrium climate, global mean outgoing longwave radiation (OLR) necessarily balances the incoming absorbed solar radiation (ASR), but with redistributions of energy within the climate system to enable this to happen on a global basis.

We have also seen that greater uncertainty means that the expected damages from climate change will necessarily be greater than anticipated, and that the allowance we must make for sea level rise will also be greater than anticipated.

Warming does not necessarily mean a worsening climate and the reliable evidence to support the claims that it will is extremely weak to any unbiased researcher.

«This doesn't necessarily mean that every eruption will be able to get sulfur dioxide into the stratosphere and form aerosols, but they are just neglected entirely in the climate models from the [Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change],» Ridleclimate models from the [Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change],» RidleClimate Change],» Ridley said.

«Believing that man - made climate change exists, as I do, does not necessarily mean that you think that it is rapid or a serious problem or that the policies to address it will actually do anything or that you are willing to pay the costs of those policies.»

«Up to 40 % of the Amazonian forests could react drastically to even a slight reduction in precipitation; this means that the tropical vegetation, hydrology and climate system in South America could change very rapidly to another steady state, not necessarily producing gradual changes between the current and the future situation (Rowell and Moore, 2000).»

The contested IPCC statement reads: «Up to 40 % of the Amazonian forests could react drastically to even a slight reduction in precipitation; this means that the tropical vegetation, hydrology and climate system in South America could change very rapidly to another steady state, not necessarily producing gradual changes between the current and the future situation (Rowell and Moore, 2000).»

A warmer climate, it turns out, does not necessarily mean a safer environment in the Arctic.

For a steady - state climate, global mean outgoing longwave radiation (OLR) necessarily balances the incoming absorbed solar radiation (ASR), but with redistributions of energy within the climate system to enable this to happen on a global basis.