Sentences with phrase «necessarily mean the way»

Just because someone has told you to be kinder to yourself, it doesn't necessarily mean the way you think about things will improve overnight.

Not exact matches

None of these doubts necessarily mean that Theranos» tests don't work, though the latest allegations add further support to the idea that the technology still has a long way to go.

While this is a blow to the idea that nationwide calorie menu requirements will dramatically alter the way America eats, it doesn't necessarily mean the policy is useless: perhaps, as the authors speculate, it may be more effective in sit - down restaurants where dining expectations are different, or for specific groups of particularly health - concious diners.

The studies are often short - term and so it doesn't necessarily say that this is a sustainable way for weight loss and also in my eyes the intermittent fasting affects people's lifestyles a lot and it means that actually if they have a really nice dinner planned with their friends one day but it's the day that they're having 500 calories then what do they do?

Even if it's the way you've done something for 15 years, that doesn't mean it's necessarily the best way.

That doesn't necessarily mean Uber's operating costs were low — they spend money on everything from research and development to discounting worldwide to hiring lobbyists — but it did mean that Uber figured out a way to avoid adding drivers» employee benefits and car ownership, maintenance and insurance to those costs.

By the way, just because our universe may have started with a Big Bang doesn't necessarily mean that was the beginning of everything.

From this heavily fortified definitional base George and Bradley reason that sexual acts of the reproductive type typically further the good of marriage, and persons (whether married or not) who engage in sexual acts of the nonreproductive type «necessarily treat their bodies and those of their sexual partners (if any) as means or instruments in ways that damage their personal (and interpersonal) integrity.»

Just because the Lord is able to make use of our generally limited apprehension of His will, and to work in and through all situations, institutions, programs, ect., this does not mean that «the way things are» necessarily reflect His ideal.

Since the meaning of life and love as we use these terms is necessarily derived from the finite sphere, we would be forced to acknowledge that our use of these terms with respect to God could only be ejaculatory — in no way cognitive.

Once you choose the way of violence, it is impossible to say, «So far and no further»; for you provoke the victim of your violence to use violence in turn, and that necessarily means using greater violence.

That's true, but just to be fair... We wouldn't learn it all in the same order or the same way, necessarily, which means that at any given time our actual understanding of the universe could still be skewed.

While litotes states something positive in a negative way, this does not necessarily mean that the opposite statement is necessarily true.

If we are among the Christians who think this way, we necessarily imagine divine experiences as structurally similar to, though perhaps much more wise and compassionate than, our own experiences; otherwise there is no meaning to our idea that God experiences.

That's the way Moses meant it anyway, not necessarily how it worked out.

As I have argued in these pages and elsewhere, the «presumption,» by detaching the just war way of thinking from its proper political context» the right use of sovereign public authority toward the end of tranquillitas ordinis, or peace» tends to invert the structure of classic just war analysis and turn it into a thin casuistry, giving priority consideration to necessarily contingent in bello judgments (proportionality of means, discrimination or noncombatant immunity) over what were always understood to be the prior ad bellum questions («prior» in that, inter alia, we can have a greater degree of moral clarity about them).

Update: By this I simply mean that some couples prefer that one person be more dominant - not necessarily the man, by the way - and I don't think that should be categorically condemned.

So, it's that kind of find, which doesn't necessarily mean this isn't a Beatles song, but there's really no way to prove it one way or the other until Sir Paul weighs in.

There are, however, two serious problems to such an approach: First, it is difficult to see how some of these passages could possibly be interpreted in a way that is in keeping with Jesus of Nazareth; and second, even if this could be done, the process would necessarily do damage to the original intent and to the established scriptural meaning of these passages.

This is just one example, of course, but it is just one example of scripture using «all» language in a way that doesn't necessarily mean «all».

Just because someone considers this a law or gives it a name — why does that necessarily mean such a «law» or pattern of assessment has to be something external to our natural brains (and our ability as like - minded being to see those things the same way)?

Men «posit talk of God» in a variety of ways, but this does not necessarily mean that God as objective reality lacks unity or identity.

Indeed we might say that the adoption of such a panentheistic view is the only way in which genuine theism can be maintained, if by theism (as distinguished from pantheism and deism) we mean that God and the world are not thought to be identical even though they are taken to be intimately and necessarily related one to the other.

If one believes the Bible to be inspired or a guide for Christian living but doesn't necessarily believe it is inerrant or the literal word of God, that doesn't have to mean we just throw it all out... it doesn't have to shatter your worldview (i.e. it's either all true or all false — fundamentalists love to think this way and teach others to do the same) Use the Episcopal 3 - legged stool model (Scripture, reason, tradition) or the Wesleyan Quadrilateral (Scripture, tradition, reason, experience).

Assuming that they are really related in the way I have argued, how do we make fully explicit what they necessarily imply about ultimate reality — not only in its meaning for us but in its structure in itself?

In rejecting the notion of «the supernatural» as meaning that which «in itself» is wholly prior or other in being than «the natural,» a naturalistic view does not necessarily deny that there is a being such as God, but only that way of categorizing such a being.

One thing you got ta consider with christians is we see God with our faith, not necessarily by sight or the evidence that He exists (also consider what existence means because God does not exist the way we or things exist because God transcends time and space.

The point is this: Yes, there is an element of «learning from their mistakes,» but quite often, this learning can be accomplished in a variety of ways, and even when the parent and child must create some form of physical separation, this does not necessarily mean that the parent has actually withdrawn.

If we are ourselves, as God means us to be and as the Church would have us to be, then necessarily we are men living at a given time, in a given place, under given conditions, with given ways of seeing and doing.

I think it's important for me to say... and this probably deserves a whole different post... that just because I draw pictures of Jesus, it doesn't necessarily mean I believe that there was the historical Jesus as presented in the gospels or that Jesus is alive today in the way evangelicals or Catholics or others believe.

But keep in mind, as you pound through endless miles on the treadmill and puff your way up imaginary flights on the stair machine, that healthy eating does not necessarily mean unsatisfying food served with a flourish of blandness.

And I don't necessarily mean that in a bad way — you just need to go into this wanting a healthy, pumpkin breakfast drink, and not a summery fruit smoothie.

His current club and manager will, of course be very keen to keep him and are saying that there is no way that he will be leaving in January, but we know that does not necessarily mean that they will succeed.

The low score doesn't necessarily mean that any deal is beyond the realms of possibility, but it does, however, reflect how Dortmund's unwillingness to part ways with the player makes any such transfer unlikely at this stage.

It just means that we shouldn't necessarily see that as a guarantee that everything is going to work out the way we want it to.

Just because someone's family looks functional from the outside doesn't necessarily mean it's working in a healthy way on the inside.

Figuring out the right way to resolve this problem may mean some drastic changes in the co sleeping setup you and your family have been enjoying, but it doesn't necessarily mean you have to stop entirely.

«Just because they're crying doesn't mean it's a bad thing, and it doesn't necessarily mean that they are hungry — it's their effective way to communicate with us,» Dr. Jonathan told FoxNews.com.

I mean, sure, you're doing an incredible thing and burning calories and sustaining your kid from your freakin» body, so it definitely counts as doing something, but it doesn't necessarily feel that way all the time.

I don't necessarily mean «weird» in a bad way.

I will preface this blog post the same way I did my first schedule post by saying that all children are different and yours might not necessarily fit into this schedule perfectly every single day but it is just meant as a guide to know what is typical at each age and as your child grows.

If you have a baby by caesarean, it doesn't necessarily mean that any babies you have in the future will also have to be delivered this way.

As a result, parents are looking for ways to give their children lasting, wonderful gifts that they will treasure - not necessarily the biggest or most expensive toy, but one that has some meaning.

Whether they have one day of experience with cloth diapers or have personally used cloth on their ten children, the presence of a blog does not mean the person has years of experience or that they're necessarily an expert or certified in any way to be giving you «expert» advice.

This doesn't mean that they necessarily agree on everything or even like one another, but they do show respect to each other in front of their children, and they've learned how to communicate in ways that minimize conflict.

Mitchell agreed: «I very much agree with that approach to the Lib Dems... the mean - spirited comments from the Lib Dems jar... Accepting we're in a coalition with people who are not our natural political bedfellow, rubbishing them won't necessarily be the way to win a majority.»

Steve: That's an important point — should you succeed, that doesn't necessarily mean that that's the way it happened, it's just a, sort of, a proof of concept, right?

Vocal learning skills alone don't necessarily mean that killer whales have language in the same way that humans do.

«This doesn't mean that one way is necessarily bad or this is the way you have to do it.

And he just had a way of coaxing creativity out of people and inspiring people; and when I say people, I mean they ranged from those who are simply lovers of mathematics without necessarily having world class talent to world class mathematicians such as Don Knuth and John Conway and Ron Graham, who was the president of the American Mathematical Society, and a great juggler incidentally; and also I think Ron may be a magician although I am not positive of that.