It deserves emphasis that Hartshorne's understanding of God's
necessary existence means that this divine existence does not make any empirical difference whatever in the world.
Not exact matches
Life is the process where you are being equipped and developing spiritual attributes
necessary for your purpose and
meaning for
existence.
Steve... that's not
necessary... let's read those writings as the product of human imagination as it seeks the
meaning and purpose of human
existence and never forget...» to err is human»... anything more is to turn them all into demi - gods.
That
means they can't CREATE the conditions
necessary for their own
existence.
Although the proper attribution of
necessary existence to God does not show that God exists (unless we are prepared to allow that reality must have some significant correspondence to what is presupposed in our attempt to find ultimate
meaning in reality — an assumption which, as I have suggested, may not be easy to justify but is probably impossible to avoid in such metaphysical thought), it does show that God is either the ground of and compatible with all that is and all that is actually possible or is totally alien to all reality.
If this implies that God has always «had a world» in which there is divine activity, that does not
mean that the creation is «
necessary» to God, as if the divine
existence could not be conceived as transcendent over and unexhausted by what goes on in that created order.
Necessary for human
existence, it is also an activity in which we struggle to find
meaning and....
Notwithstanding the fact that whatever human
meaning we may discover would be inseparable from the
meaning of the cosmos, it is still
necessary for us to focus our quest for the
meaning of revelation on the question of the significance of our own
existence as a distinctly historical species.
Since the inclusion of the events in the causal past of some observer is a
necessary condition of their observability, it
means that future events are intrinsically unobservable and thus it is entirely superfluous to postulate their
existence.
No reason at all, for I am not suggesting that there is actually a final philosophical system — e.g. idealism, and Hegelianism in particular — or that it is
necessary for our exegesis to take over the actual answers that philosophy gives to the existential question of the
meaning of my own particular
existence.
Both democratic and antidemocratic forms saw «property» (the
means of
existence) as being
necessary for freedom, but antidemocrats excluded non-proprietors from citizenship, while democrats asserted that the republic had to introduce measures that ensured that all citizens were materially independent.
This
means that the
existence of regulatory agencies does not imply that Congress can delegate the power to rewrite statutes as
necessary to make them Constitutional.
On the contrary, in choosing to conceive, parents are taking the
necessary first steps for their child to come into
existence; provided they are not making these choices for selfish reasons, they are not treating their child as a
means only and are acting permissibly.
«The people living along the Nine form a ravaged micro-community whose Darwinian
existence is a day - to - day hustle, and survival is by any
means necessary.»