He would say this on the ground that the reason we would not make the same statement about any particular being, e.g., elephants or unicorns, is precisely because it is contradictory to assert of any particular being that it has
the necessary mode of existence.
Not exact matches
There is then no contradiction in supposing that a being whose
existence is
necessary may nevertheless alter in some respects in the
mode of that
existence.
The problem that is raised by Hartshorne's understanding
of God's
mode of existence, granting his view that God is not (as with Whitehead) a single occasion but a series
of occasions, seems to be rather the question
of what makes this series
necessary and so unending.
Hartshomne hails as Anselm's great discovery the ideas that God's
mode of being is utterly unique in his perfection or unsurpassability and that contingent
existence is inferior to
necessary existence.72