Sentences with phrase «need simple arguments»

Publishers also need Simple arguments.

Not exact matches

Grantham is also bullish on two particular asset classes — farmland and forestry — based on the simple argument that «they don't make any more of it» and we need land to grow food.

In spite of this data, you could make an argument for people holding more stocks in their portfolios for the simple fact that people are living longer than ever, so maybe they need more stocks to grow their money in retirement:

Basically I think now that the argument (EWM 211 - 19) needs to be developed in terms of two stages, the first concerning the reorientation brought about by conceiving an initial phase of simple physical feelings in concrescence, and then a second stage introduced by the idea of «subjective aim.»

The argument was simple, hardly needing to be made explicit.

That was my argument on several articles relating to the Swansea loss, its a fact that finishing second above United City and Liverpool is a statement and crowd pleaser both of wich are needed both to progress and also to look good and show improvement its as simple as that!!

That said, I do agree on the signings point — my main argument is that if you believe we need them then an explanation of why and how this would change the squad would be more enjoyable to read than a simple statement of facts and then an opinion without analysis.

There were several times when a simple misunderstanding could have escalated into a full - blown argument; however, reminding ourselves of what the core issue was — the feeling that was felt, the need that was identified — diffused the situation into an opportunity to really see the big picture.

In my view the question that needs to be answered and the argument that every party needs to engage is quite simple.

I doubt I have the reserves of wit to grapple with how the JP is derived from Fisher Information, for my purposes, and I suspect those required for the problem at hand, simpler arguments based directly on the need for invariance under coordinate transformations, specifically under a coordinate flip, and perhaps the desire for well behaved estimators would suffice, and be easier for those such as I to comprehend.

We know that to effectively deliver sanctions the message needs to be simple, clear and not negotiable; in practice it is easy to get caught up in a lengthy argument or confrontation.

Educators, Businesses Need to Collaborate on Job Skills San Francisco Chronicle, 2/21/14 «Beyond the arguments typically dominating the education reform debate is the simple fact that students are not being set up to participate in today's changing economy.

Grantham is also bullish on two particular asset classes — farmland and forestry — based on the simple argument that «they don't make any more of it» and we need land to grow food.

By the way, my arguments assume that tokamak physics and technology works well and is reasonably simple, meaning that not many more components will have to be added to the system to allow it to operate on a steady basis for very long periods of time between the long shutdowns needed to change out radiation - damaged, radioactive materials.

For Bruce's benefit I will bring up the 2010 Hartwell Paper again — http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/27939/ We need to move beyond the simple arguments expressed in utterly simple minded idioms of science, beyond the tax or no tax — an unwinnable argument at best — to creative solutions.

I doubt I have the reserves of wit to grapple with how the JP is derived from Fisher Information, for my purposes, and I suspect those required for the problem at hand, simpler arguments based directly on the need for invariance under coordinate transformations, specifically under a coordinate flip, and perhaps the desire for well behaved estimators would suffice, and be easier for those such as I to comprehend.

The physics is necessary to justify the hypothesis scientifically, but need not be part of the argument itself, which can be, and almost always is, made in much simpler terms.

From the point of view of this class — a class I'll just call «lawyers» — it's too clear for argument that (i) law has things to do so that some instrumentalist theory has to be adopted; (ii) few things are simple, so that no single theory will work in every case, whether it's «wealth maximization», «corrective justice», «contract as promise», compensation or deterrence; and (iii) the demands of practice, the solicitor's need to create relations which will be projected into the (uncertain) future and to control the risks his or her client faces, the barrister's need to conduct litigation at a price the parties can afford and in the context of the adversary system, powerfully limit the consideration that a lawyer can give to theory.

While clients should not be able to use a lawyer's trust account anonymously, I haven't heard any compelling arguments as to why a lawyer would need to confirm a person's identity before giving them simple legal advice.