One also has to wonder whether the international treaties and organizations
needed to agree on and execute a
geoengineering scheme are significantly easier to realize than the agreements
needed to decarbonize the energy future, which would offer safer and more durable climate protection.
Geoengineering schemes need ranking system to avoid wasting money, destroying the planet (10/26/2008) Schemes to alter Earth's climate on a planetary scale should be ranked according to their efficacy, cost, risks and their rate of mitigation, argues a new editorial published in Nature Geos
schemes need ranking system to avoid wasting money, destroying the planet (10/26/2008)
Schemes to alter Earth's climate on a planetary scale should be ranked according to their efficacy, cost, risks and their rate of mitigation, argues a new editorial published in Nature Geos
Schemes to alter Earth's climate on a planetary scale should be ranked according to their efficacy, cost, risks and their rate of mitigation, argues a new editorial published in Nature Geoscience.
International Oversight & Cooperation Essential When it comes down to it though (vague wording aside), is something that is both critically important and agreed upon by vocal anti-
geoengineering activists and the more sober voices of the Royal Society alike: There
needs to be international oversight of
geoengineering schemes.