There are some pilot schemes around that get subsidies, and it does nt
need huge subsidies.
I'm personally more worried about badly secured and aging stockpiles of nuclear warheads than about active nuclear power plants, but an economic argument can be made about these plants (many
need huge subsidies, cost more than planned, etc).
Both large agricultural firms and wealthy, leftist political donors, such as the likes of Gore and Soros,
need the huge subsidies to make their biofuel investments profitable.
Re # 26 & # 28 - true, wind is not comparable in price or with the delivered capacity of fossil power generation - if it was, then wind would not
need the huge subsidies it gets here in Europe - including the UK (about  # 1bn / annum)- which is the best place in NW Europe for wind power!.
Not exact matches
He's right but as Fiona Bruce argued in the debate the light
needs to be shone brightly on the
huge subsidy that the union movement receives from local and national taxpayers.
You don't
need a
huge budget or to learn the hard way by being ripped off by
subsidy vendors.
The upfront costs will be higher, and will
need incentives /
subsidies / mandates / deadlines, but the long term cost picture includes a trillion a year that we don't spend on fossil fuels, a
huge savings.
Certainly once it has obtained a critical mass, renewables should not
need any help but expecting renewables to expand without assistance while fossil fuels receive
huge subsidies is ridiculous.
Recognizing that wind farms are not the source of reliable energy when actually
needed (see chart) would allow politicians to quit wasting
huge subsidies on crony capitalists and wealthy investors.
Nothing tears a community apart like a wind farm that nobody wants, the country does not
need and is built solely for the
huge tax
subsidies.
Today, Oil Change International released a comprehensive report on fossil fuel exploration and production
subsidies in the U.S. — Cashing in on All of the Above: U.S. Fossil Fuel Production Subsidies under Obama — which demonstrates that at a time when we need urgent action on climate change more than ever, the U.S. government is channeling huge and growing amounts of money to increasing discovery and production of oil, gas,
subsidies in the U.S. — Cashing in on All of the Above: U.S. Fossil Fuel Production
Subsidies under Obama — which demonstrates that at a time when we need urgent action on climate change more than ever, the U.S. government is channeling huge and growing amounts of money to increasing discovery and production of oil, gas,
Subsidies under Obama — which demonstrates that at a time when we
need urgent action on climate change more than ever, the U.S. government is channeling
huge and growing amounts of money to increasing discovery and production of oil, gas, and coal.
At last week's Conservative Party Conference, the new Energy Minister, John Hayes, promised that «the high - flown theories of bourgeois Left - wing academics will not override the interests of ordinary people who
need fuel for heat, light and transport — energy policies, you might say, for the many, not the few» — a pledge that has triggered fury from green activists, who fear reductions in the
huge subsidies given to wind - turbine firms.