Sentences with phrase «need less points»

If you need less points, it would be much less.

The only positive change is for those who plan to redeem your points for award nights in India, where a lot of hotels have dropped to lower categories, which means you will need less points for award nights.

300 hotels going up (need more points for a reward night) and 150 hotels going down (need less points for a reward night).

As with the trend with other reward programs, some of the properties in India are going down in category, so you would need less points for a reward night.

If you notice the hotels going in category, there are many hotels in India and Asia that are going down in Category, which means you need less points for an award night.

Not exact matches

And due to its economies of scale and zero marketing needs, it would have very low management fees, less than half a percentage point.

Perhaps now that Equifax and Deloitte have placed an exclamation point on the entire issue and regulatory roll - back efforts are a tad less in vogue at the moment, Congress will do what needs to be done and business will be more willing to change.

«It's clear that people call in sick for a variety of reasons, some less honest, but everyone will catch a cold at some point and legitimately need the time off,» said Ted Karkus, CEO for ProPhase Labs, the manufacturer of Cold - EEZE.

And to get there, Alberta needs to focus more on coaxing and wheedling other provinces into seeing things its way, and less on defending a narrow «Alberta First» point of view.

This not only boosts existing shareholder trust and support, but also shortens preparation time for new rounds, enables new investors to better assess historical results and leads to less of a need for future data points for validation.

«Put it all together, and Lang says that Red Hat really just needs to rally less than three dollars from here, to $ 100, at which point he expects the stock to roar higher before temporarily running out of steam at the $ 110 area.»

And the more work it needs, the less developers are going to bother since that negates the point of having a write - once - run - anywhere system.

By loudly owning her choices, Sandberg makes it a little safer for the rest of us to declare that parents working late into the night is killer on families (Mashable points to research «that children are healthier, happier and better performing students when they eat with their families») and on personal productivity and health, making it a bit easier for those of us with less lofty positions to take back our schedules and admit that we need to work saner hours.

Let's be frank, up until this point, the Taylor rule from John Taylor (of Stanford) has been a very applicable rule in terms of suggesting the need for more or less ease.

Small businesses have lower demands and less sophisticated needs, so this is an easier point of entry than enterprise - grade software.

However, at that point you need to make less than $ 1,250 in sales each month for it to still make sense to get over the other plan.

At the time of its December meeting, the available information confirmed the assessment that a less expansionary policy setting was needed, and the cash rate was therefore raised by a further 25 basis points, to 5.25 per cent.

- fundamentalist Bible thumpers), need to sweep their own houses clean and think less about imposing THEIR point of view.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AR-15 Point being that a simple handgun or shot gun should be all one needs to protect themselves... something that doesn't fire 30 rounds in as many seconds or less.

Cavanaugh's More of Jesus, Less of Me makes a similar point: «Those of us who hunger for more than we need, for more than is good for us, have another hunger: we have emotional problems that we have not exposed to the healing of our Lord Jesus... But there is good news: the Holy Spirit can heal these unnamed hungers.»

Jewish persecution of the Christians had begun alongside the Roman, and everything pointed to the need to see the new covenant as a fulfillment of the old, to stress the new righteousness as not less but more demanding than the old.

Perhaps for the less cerebral, you'd like to explain just what David's point was and of course in a non-interpretive manner, which leads one to this conclusion: Why do we need David, you will suffice.

It stands to reason that an all knowing eternal God could predict what you and I would believe no before He made and thus have already know whether we would except him or not And I'm not sure what you trying to say by that And because we want to tell others about Him and be used by Him to reach others And that commit does not make any sense, but clearly God is not a punk, as I have already demonstrated And your main point, as I already explained is false No, but my belief is true, none the less, it is by definition virtually impossible to prove anything And no, I don't need knee pads.

At a later point, the need for separation and differentiation is less strong, and the individual can appropriately move back to a closer relationship to the family of origin.

And he needed no less, Gleick might have added, what three centuries ago Giambattista Vico was calling fantasia, that faculty of imaginative understanding so conspicuously lacking in the Enlightenment absolutists who, as Isaiah Berlin has pointed out, did so much to create the rift between the sciences and the humanities.

And while I see how true your point is that we should teach less and obey more... I need to be shown how to obey more.

«At this point we grow far more corn and soybeans than we need, and far less good food than we should; we have far too few people on the farm; and it's all the result of government policy favoring industrialized agriculture.»

His emphasis on rebirth points to the need within the general pattern of growth for decisive moments of turning from less to more adequate frameworks of meaning — for surrendering smaller ways of relating in favor of more complete ones.

oil (more or less as needed), choose one with a high smoke point like grapeseed, coconut or peanut oil

With interest growing in the Meat Free Monday campaign, Paul also points out that vegetarian cuisine needs to show what it can do, not only to counter certain false impressions, but to capitalise on the increasing numbers of people doing their bit for the environment and animal welfare by eating less meat.

For this shake, the mint leaves will lightly color and flavor it, to the point that you really don't even need to add extra mint, Less you like your mint milkshake extra minty.

It's sweeter than sugar, so you need less of it; plus, it may be better for diabetics because of its low glycemic index (though that point is controversial).

you need a dictionary, going from 4 to 3rd with less points can not be described as a massive improvement or even an improvement at all.Stop gassin an wake up

The past few weeks, it has been a case of they fail, we fail...... they gain lil points, we gain lil points...... they are still tailing us with less that 9points...... And we knw so well how to disappoint when we are needed to excel most!

Despite scoring four goals, this performance from England was less than convincing, with the Three Lions definitely needing to step it up a gear should they want to secure all three points against Slovakia at Wembley on Monday.

Their stopping point would be less due to lack of need.

Whatever floats your boat mate, I'm not going to argue with someone that fails to listen to another view, my point stands, whether you agree with wenger or not doesn't make you more or less of a supporter it just means you have a differing view, no need for insults.

I am not it taking out on Cech, I'm only pointing out that when a player is in Emirates, we need to be less critical.

But I'm not stupid, Mustafi and Kos will likely make less mistakes in the long run than the old partnership, esp as time goes on, but I still think some fans need to cut Mert some slack for reasons I pointed too.

We dominated Sp ** s at The Emirates earlier this season and with better finishing and composure in the second half we could easily have doubled that score.The team were focused and kept a good shape all through the game.We should not need motivating for a game as big as this.The fact it's a NLD is important enough but 3 points will put us in with a chance of getting back into the mix for a top 4 finish.Anything less and we will struggle.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

Facts of the season so far, we have half the points of the league leaders, less points than this time last year, only two fit first team defenders, more money in the bank than ever before.how much proof do you need that wengers job is to make money for his boss and not win trophies.

Olivier Giroud is a solid option, but doesn't seem to cut it at the highest level, while Theo Walcott isn't the focal point that is needed — and the less said about Danny Welbeck's four goals in 25 top flight appearances last season the better.

Mentioning Ramsey's consistently less - than - stellar play is a dangerous thing but it is nearing the point that he maybe needs to see the bench now and then.

Anything less than 3 points is unthinkable for us tonight, infact we need to boost our goal difference up, just in case WBA do the unthinkable against City?

Anything less than a big win would be a disappointment, and they'll need the style points with voters if they hope to stay at No. 2 in the BCS.

Hull City will take on what is surely going to be an under strength Man United side but Sunderland are still not out of the woods and if they manage less than one point from their last two matches then they can be caught by the St James» Park outfit but they will need to get something from their final game at Villa Park.

There is no need to be concerned about Arsene Wenger's material wellbeing into the future as he has earned tens of millions as managerof this club so everyone can rest easy on that point, however, the future of the club is much less certain given the mismanagement is has suffered for some time now.

Though they've had excellent offensive contributions from their two young stars in Brown and Jayson Tatum, they'll eventually need more from Kyrie Irving, who is shooting 4 % worse from the field, 6 % worse from deep, and averaging more than four points less than he did last year.

Fair point but in my opinion City need Aubameyang less than Spurs need Janssen.