Sentences with phrase «need less sets»

Not exact matches

«What I've made clear to my EU counterparts in relation to financial contribution is what I set out in my Florence (Italy) speech, which is that I've said nobody need be concerned for the current budget plan that they would have to pay more or receive less as a result of the U.K. leaving and that we will honor the commitments we have made during our membership,» May told reporters.

Not every solution or app needs to set the entire world on fire or to be built on a platform just slightly less grand than the Taj Mahal.

There are still regulations, of course, but all - in - all, the process is much less complicated than setting up a bank, credit union, or traditional loan company to cater to people's financial needs.

With a community of almost two billion people, it is less feasible to have a single set of standards to govern the entire community so we need to evolve towards a system of more local governance.

From a muscle - building perspective, I need to train with higher weights and less sets and reps; based on how I'm made, that's the best way to optimize muscle growth and protein synthesis.

For less than $ 100, the new process allows scientists to make some of the key materials needed to modify an organism's entire genome, or it's complete set of DNA, the researchers said.

The Home Mini and Echo Dot do not match the sound quality of the HomePod, but consumers may see less need for a superior, pricier speaker from Apple once they have a rival set up.

Overall, this budget adds new details about how Ottawa will spend some of the $ 93 billion in new money the Liberals had already set out for infrastructure — $ 11.2 billion will go to affordable housing over the next 11 years, less than the $ 12.6 billion over eight years the Federation of Canadian Municipalities says was needed.

One way to talk about 2017 positioning in more concrete terms than just more or less is to start with a basic or neutral portfolio set up to meet specific needs and preferences of a hypothetical investor.

If you want to build a retirement account up to $ 1.5 million by age 65, you will need to set aside much less if you start at age 25.

But if you're a financially flush member of the silver - haired set who doesn't necessarily need to withdraw funds from the IRA, the requirement is less appealing.

At the time of its December meeting, the available information confirmed the assessment that a less expansionary policy setting was needed, and the cash rate was therefore raised by a further 25 basis points, to 5.25 per cent.

If black athletes less frequently achieve the minimal academic standard set for those participating in intercollegiate sports, then let us promulgate for them a separate, lower standard, even as we accuse of racism those suggesting the need for a standard in the first place.

Laymen also make comments which show that they feel the need of more direct address in preaching and less talking about the faith as if it were only a set of optional ideas.

On how we do what needs to be done, Reno is less clear — but this is a short book, setting out a goal and a broad strategy, not a detailed manifesto.

It hardly needs to be said that no one has been able to come up with a criterion that makes babies in the womb less human but leaves everyone else as he was; the teeth of the moral gears are too finely set for that.

Here the shutter speed is much less important, because the strobe is fast enough to freeze motion, and you really want to balance the power of the flash with the ambient daylight, so you need to adjust your flash (and other settings) accordingly.

I like to start with a little less than I think I need and then taste it, adjust and let set another 15 minutes before serving.

Even better is that they take less than 10 minutes to put together and only need 15 minutes to set.

You don't even need to set aside the afternoon; you can make a few pint jars in less than thirty minutes.

Next inject your pork chops with the broth / cider vinegar mixture ans set them aside while you fire up the grill, I left mine out for about an hour because the closer to room temp they are before cooking, the less time they need on the heat.

And best of all, the whole pudding comes together in one bowl in less than 2 minutes, and all you need to do is let it set overnight.

Absolutely right there He won't go anywhere because he does what the board wants him to He delivers profit and very low risk and sets expectations at virtually zero so that's the fans don't expect too m7ch and he doesn't have to deliver and the board don't need to spend Its a farce and more importantly a blatant con Every single fan who puts even a penny into the club either through season tickets right the way down to buying a mug or a pen or a shirt is being robbed by a board who care NOTHING for sporting glory and even less for the fans who finance the club There SHOULD be mass walkouts on home games and protests at every turn but, there won't be because the demographic of fans now is of a majority who are not true supporters but millennial who only want to say they attend the ground every other week.

He was supposed to be Helm with great hands and it seems to me that he is a much less defensively responsible Helm with marginally better hands and a decent release but I'm not so sure his hockey IQ is where it needs to be for his skill set.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

Nothing like one underachiever blowing smoke up the ass of another... we know that Ozil has some incredible technical gifts, but to be considered the best you have to bring more than just assists to the table... for me, a top player has to possess a more well - rounded game, which doesn't mean they need to be a beast on both ends of the pitch, but they must have the ability to take their game to another level when it matters most... although he amassed some record - like stats early on, it set the bar too high, so when people expected him to duplicate those numbers each year the pressure seemed to get the best of our soft - spoken star... obviously that's not an excuse for what has happened in the meantime, but it's important to make note of a few things: (1) his best year was a transition year for many of the traditionally dominant teams in the EPL, so that clearly made the numbers appear better than they actually were and (2) Wenger's system, or lack thereof, didn't do him any favours; by playing him out of position and by not acquiring world - class striker and / or right - side forward that would best fit an Ozil - centered offensive scheme certainly hurt his chances to repeat his earlier peformances, (3) the loss of Cazorla, who took a lot of pressure off Ozil in the midfield and was highly efficient when it came to getting him the ball in space, negatively impacted his effectiveness and (4) he likewise missed a good chunk of games and frankly never looked himself when he eventually returned to the field... overall the Ozil experiment has had mixed reviews and rightfully so, but I do have some empathy for the man because he has always carried himself the same way, whether for Real or the German National team, yet he has only suffered any lengthy down periods with Arsenal... to me that goes directly to this club's inability to surround him with the necessary players to succeed, especially for someone who is a pass first type of player; as such, this simply highlights our club's ineffective and antiquated transfer policies... frankly I'm disappointed in both Ozil and our management team for not stepping up when it counted because they had a chance to do something special, but they didn't have it in them... there is no one that better exemplifies our recent history than Ozil, brief moments of greatness undercut by long periods of disappointing play, only made worse by his mopey posturing like a younger slightly less awkward Wenger... what a terribly waste

which is certainly not a slight on the young french national player; like him or not, Sanchez has provided some real world - class performances for club and country in recent years... if you do this move, you need to really clean house or face some serious consequences for the foreseeable future... half measures are rarely rewarded, that's how we got here... tear down the wall... we need to get rid of Giroud, not because he isn't a talented player, his skill - set simply doesn't make sense if we hope to maximize the offensive potential of a quick passing, one - touch scheme... we need to evolve, like Barcelona, who realized you needed to have clinical finishers or face a mind - numbing future of horizontal passes and largely ineffective crosses... Barca went and got Suarez, even though they had Messi and Neymar on the roster (just imagine the possibilities — another in the litany of Wenger «what ifs»)... we need to be as clinical in the boardroom as on the pitch... accept nothing less or move on... personally I would move on from Welbeck, Giroud and Walcott, even Ox if he isn't all in... I think the most intriguing player might be Perez, which runs counter to the thoughts in my head when he arrived late last summer... we need a deep lying DM with quick feet and long ball potential, midfielders who can counter quickly even when they are spread out and 4 or 5 players who know how to attack the lanes (kind of a cross between Barca, Dortmund and Monaco)... this is seriously an achievable goal, one that logically should have been achieved quite a few years ago... did no one in the Arsenal organization see the financial restructuring of the football universe... think of the players we could have had but we weren't willing to cough up the dough only for those individuals to have their value double or triple within a 12 to 24 month period... even if just from an investment perspective these «no deals» represent a failure of monumental proportions... only if you cared, of course

There were some mistakes, and Joevin needs to limit the number of fouls in bad spots he gives up (67», 73») as they allow a lesser team set pieces.

Debora and her sister then designed what did not yet exist, a smaller nursing assist pillow in different sizes that was to work with a baby's head and body to bring the baby closer to mom's breast for an easier latch with less needing to hunch over, creating a set - up where a breastfeeding mom could breastfeed hands - free!

Many natural diapers still need to use a synthetic gel to help keep the diapers leak free and safe so the Nurtured by Nature brand set out to guarantee that their brand of diapers are made with less of this gel and more of the natural good stuff.

Let's face it, we're all lucky enough to have more or less everything we need, so we have a bit of an unwritten rule in our family that gifts have to be useful (and / or useable), and I think edible gifts fit really well into this category, so when Ryvita Thins set me the challenge of creating a Christmas gift hamper, I knew exactly what I wanted to do.

However, as a work - out - of - home mom who started with pumping 4x a day at work, I realized that once the routine is established, setting up and cleaning pump parts becomes automatic, leading to less time needed as mom becomes more practiced.

The design makes it pretty easy to set up and takes less than 10 minutes to put together and it doesn't need any special tools.

Screws along with screws need to all remain in location Anything a lot less could set off an accident, seriously harming your youngster.

The Kinect system runs its software on the Xbox's powerful chip, but TVs and set - top boxes lack advanced processors, so Softkinetic - Optrima chose an approach that needs less computing power.

The less good news is that translators need a very particular set of skills, including some less obvious ones.

«As governments prepare to set the rules and the first companies gear up to mine, now is the time to ask whether we just have to accept seabed mining, or should instead decide that the potential damage is just so great that we really need to find less destructive alternatives.»

For example: setting yourself healthy long - term goals of eating better and drinking less in the lead - up to an event because you know it gives you more energy and mental clarity as opposed to the «need to lose 5 kg yesterday» mentality that leads to depravation and stressful energy.»

When you focus on the right techniques in your training, you'll need less total number of sets and you'll spend less time training.

Generally, this nylon will need to be looped 2x over the anchor point, which is less likely to slide during a set.

On the other hand, doing long - duration steady cardio or performing countless sets and reps can raise cortisol.You certainly don't need to lift heavy all the time, but you should spend a portion of your training time performing sets of eight or less reps. And don't go crazy with the HIIT — a couple quality sessions each week will go a long way.

Dr. Justin Marchegiani: Yeah, if we have like a small intestinal bacterial overgrowth or a dysbiosis, that's gonna set us up to have an inability to break down food optimally because our hydrochloric acid and enzyme levels will be less, so we got ta make sure that that's good because if not, that good healthy diet may not be getting into our bloodstream and — and going where it needs to go.

With that said, you should be able to complete deadlifts / wallballs in less than 3 sets and HSPU will likely need to be broken up early.

Due to the high intensity advocated, HIT enthusiasts say that fewer sets are needed and thus less time is required in the gym to do full - body workouts and to achieve results superior to more traditional workouts involving less intensity and more sets.

Because the reps are higher and the risks are lower in phase one, you'll need fewer warm - up sets and you'll also need slightly less rest between sets than you will in phase two.

I've been thinking about KBs for a while now but my main problem is that it seems like unlike with my adjustable dumbells, I would need a separate KB for each progressive weight, making nuanced training less feasible unless I have a full set (e.g. choosing to do a different number of reps or sets.)

Ideally your sets need to be done in less than 70 seconds.

Remember, the longer the intervals, the less time a person may need to recover (due to the obvious lack of exercise intensity), whereas shorter more intense interval sets may require much longer to recover to do the increased energy output.

Remember, the quicker and more efficiently you move through the complex, the less rest time you will need to be ready for the next set, so make sure you're pushing to the brink of your cardiovascular limits and mechanical breakdown points on each movement!

If you do 5 planche exercises for 5 sets and not progressing maybe you need to do less volume and more intensity.