Sentences with phrase «need of species»

These relationships are formed not only because of the need for attachment, but also for the need of species survival.

«expensive, complex, delicate, intrinsically useless, created for some obscure psychic need of the species if not the race, from the virgin resources of a continent, to be the indvidual muscles, bones and flesh of a new and legless kind.»

These relationships are formed not only because of the need for attachment, but also for the need of species survival.

Casein is significantly lower in human milk, whereas it is significantly higher in cow's milk, making cow milk tough for human babies to digest, and making human milk unfit for feeding to baby cows... All mammals have some whey protein in their milk - it is merely in different compositions depending on the mammal and the needs of that species» young.

«The results of the survey will help us to understand the needs of this species and how to manage Andean bears in this location.»

These niches describe the environmental needs of a species and allow conclusions about how the species adapted to its environment.

Dragons, like certain species of amphibians and fish, have no fixed biological sex; they can shift between male and female to meet the reproductive needs of the species.

Our formulas are based on science and crafted by our on - staff nutritionist specifically for the needs of each species.

Housing and management must meet the health, emotional and behavioural needs of each species of animal.

Wild or exotic animals are often acquired without full knowledge of the specific physiological, psychological, social, environmental, behavioural and exercise needs of the species.

Enriching the environment means providing suitable outlets to meet the needs of a species.

Humane Canada believes that experiments and activities involving live animals should be limited to observations of the normal living patterns, behaviour, growth, and development of domestic animals, or wild animals in the free living state or in those zoos or aquaria which maintain animals in suitable naturalistic environments which meet the health, emotional and behavioural needs of each species of animal.

Hartz Diets have been formulated to meet the unique nutritional needs of each species.

Hartz diets have been formulated to meet the unique nutritional needs of each species.

However, the ASPCA believes that where pets are kept in classrooms, their environment should be non-stressful and should meet the needs of the species being kept.

When considering how to feed our pet birds properly, we usually focus on the nutritional needs of the species of bird we are feeding, as well as other factors such as activity level and age — all of which are important.

Not exact matches

Brain - chemistry studies show that, as a species, humans need to be pushed out of their comfort zones in order to grow.

Lang and Stackpole have heard about ROV units being used by a wide range of people, including aquaculturists, conservationists looking for invasive species, teachers, engineers who need to inspect pipes and, yes, even marine scientists.

To fight it, we need to fight poaching and the «exploitation and trade of threatened species.»

«By failing to adequately limit population growth, reassess the role of an economy rooted in growth, reduce greenhouse gases, incentivize renewable energy, protect habitat, restore ecosystems, curb pollution, halt defaunation, and constrain invasive alien species, humanity is not taking the urgent steps needed to safeguard our imperiled biosphere.»

I pray to whichever holy name (God, Allah, Jehovah, Krishna, Jesus, etc.) suits the ONE Omniscient, Omnipresent, Omnipotent being that ignorance is wiped away from our species and we become a closer, more loving, peaceful creature and that we realize how much time we waste and how much further we push our fellow neighbor and brother under God, regardless of creed, away debating over who's God is better and discover the error of our ways before we destroy each other... before it's too late, because The End is Nigh!!!!! LOL!!!!! Really though, isn't the world full of enough tragedy, and aren't their so many more important things that need our energy and attention like the innocent children in Pakistan dying from diseases from the flood or the homeless children in our own country, or the lack of education, which is exactly what leads to this kind of debate?

Atheists: I know many there are many people that practice religion just by fanaticism, I've seen many people in my opinion stupid (excuse the word) praying to saints hopping to solve their problems by repeating pre-made sentences over and over, but there are others different, I don't think Religion and Science need to be opposites, I believe in God, I'm Catholic and I have many reasons to believe in him, I don't think however that we should pray instead of looking for the cause and applying a solution, Atheists think they are smart because they focus on Science and technology instead of putting their faith in a God, I don't think God will solve our problems, i think he gave us the means to solve them by ourselves that's were God is, also I think that God created everything but not as a Magical thing but stablishing certain rules like Physics and Quimics etc. he's not an idiot and he knew how to make it so everything was on balance, he's the Scientist of Scientist the Mathematic of Mathematics, the Physician of Physicians, from the tiny little fact that a mosquito, an insect species needs to feed from blood from a completely different species, who created the mosquitos that way?

Or if you need to link love to something else, how about something plausible: Love is the emotional idealization of the mutual care that members of social species feel for other members of their in group and, as such, is the product of natural selection.

The government doesn't need to recognize marriage (I don't give a hang if they don't recognize my relationship with my wife); the government doesn't need to run public schools (and get into the fight about whether evolution truly explains the origin of species and the origin of life).

That is, Druckenmiller can clue you to the shocking truth about your self - interest, which to defend you will need to vote Republican at all state and national levels of government, at least until the population of the endangered species Fiscally Conservative Democrat rebounds sufficiently.

If these parameters were needed to define a god, should he exist, would you not say that with all of the suffering and death and disease in the world, that the existence of god through the condition of our species would be more readily disproved than anything?

The evolutionary development of the eye is observable even today becuase its various stages are still there in extant species with each stage fulfilling the organism's needs in their respective environmental niches.

To further most animal species, except some of the more basic forms of life and the earliest ones, sexual intercourse between male and female is needed.

At the close of the twentieth century, with ecological deterioration accelerating and the nuclear threat ever with us, we need to feel not acceptance but the challenge to join forces on the side of life, for while we, like all creatures, are ultimately part of a universe that is brutal and may well end, we have, while we live, a part to play different from that of any other creature: we are responsible agents who can join with our loving parent to help our own and other species to survive and flourish.

But, an adam and eve believer would say, «wait, theres 250 of them, we just need 2 to keep the species going!»

The moral philosophy of Western Civilization perceives intrinsic human equality as an objective truth under which our moral status need not be earned by possessing favored characteristics; it comes with the package of species membership.

If your god really gives a sh!t about what one species of mammal does with its reproductive organs, then he needs to reexamine his childish priorities.

If so, how do we balance the rights and needs of human beings against those of other species.

Perhaps another population of the original species finds itself somewhere where they need good hand - eye coordination to catch their food.

There is no God needed for our species, in fact, this planet would be better - off without this powerful delusion in the guise of goodness for the obvious sake of control.

@transframer — With all due respect, you didn't really address the issues raised regarding: 1) actual # of extant vertebrate species; 2) the fact that land inverts «breath air» and would have drowned if not accounted for on the ark; 3) that the dino genera identified in the wiki link far exceeds 50; 4) the need to account for extinct land vertebrates in addition to those still around; 5) that many marine fish would have died as their habitat's salinity dropped; 6) that your % allotments for food / water don't reflect the fact that many forms require fresh meat and / or eat disproportionately to their sizes; 7) the specific dietary / environmental constraints involved in the migration to the Ark and the return trips from Mt. Ararat.

Morality, love, ethics are all natural human characteristics which are based on survival of the species and evolve from societal needs.

At this point, hopefully, I've shown that injustice, while a vexation to be overcome as best we can, is a fundamental component needed for the survival of the species.

Numerous cultures in SE Asia are changing with the times and accepting molted tail feathers from endangered hornbills species maintained in zoos instead of harvesting / killing them in the wild so that they can meet their cultural / religious needs without killing off the species... why can't this Native American tribe do the same?

The purely twaddling inhuman and too - human men are to such a degree without feeling for the need of solitude that like a certain species of social birds (the so - called love birds) they promptly die if for an instant they have to be alone.

When libertarian Ronald Bailey reads Leon Kass reads on the need to reflect on the violence biotechnology might do to our natural enjoyments and natural fulfillments, he complains: «Leon Kass is out to kill me (meaning deprive me of biotechnology that might overcome nature's intention that Bailey soon enough be replaced by another member of our species).»

steve, could it be that we would need those resourses millions of years later to advance our species?

The need for pure air, clean water, healthy food, adequate shelter, the regeneration of the species and the overcoming of all threats to human survival — these have once again become the central issues to which we must «devote» ourselves.

We share with the other animals the need for air, drink, food, shelter, survival and the regeneration of the species.

We need not anthropocentrically imagine the evolutionary process to culminate in man, for it is quite conceivable that in time it might bypass man and the entire class of mammals to favor some very different species capable of a greater complexity than man can achieve; if not here on earth, then in some other planetary system.

For example, if the average limb length of a species grew by 50 cm (~ 20 inches) over 50K yrs, and the average generation was 5 yrs (10K generations), the requisite increase per generation would only need to be 0.005 cm per year.

• Among endangered species in need of protection is the village atheist.

Mark, as a vast number of our species needs a security blanket and do good deeds in hope of a reward (just as horrible deeds are also done for the same reward) yes there are many positives.

Things like education, scientific knowledge, and scientific examination of the way humans act and react are needed to forestall any future «nightmare» of «biblical» proportions as regards survival of the human species.

For Shepard the sensibility we need, if we are to be saved from neurotic self - destruction as a species, is like that of our hunting and gathering ancestors.